Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,955 results
1.55s
Kirby Parkway Professional Condominium Association, Inc. v. Cindy-Jarvis Limited, L.P.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 30, 2020
George v. Building Materials Corp. of Am., 44 S.W.3d 481, 486 (Tenn. 2001); see also United States v. Crossley, 224 F.3d 847, 858 (6th Cir. 2000); McLendon v. South Carolina Dep’t of Highways & Pub. … Estate of Brown, 402 S.W.3d 193, 198-99 (Tenn. 2013) (emphasis added). As such, any defense asserting the statute of limitations may be waived if not properly pleaded.
Cited 0 timesPublishedG and N Restaurant Group, Inc. d/b/a City Cafe Diner v. City of Chattanooga
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 8, 2014
Frank Brown, III, Chancellor No. … Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. [599,] 608, 81 S.Ct. [1144,] 1148 [(1961)]; Fritts v. Wallace, 723 S.W.2d 948, 949-50 (Tenn. 1987); Brumley v. Town of Greeneville, 38 Tenn.
Cited 0 timesPublished841 S.W.2d 321 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 15, 1992
Duck River Electric Membership Cooperative v. City of Manchester, 529 S.W.2d 202 (Tenn. 1975) and Franklin Power and Light Co. v. Middle Tennessee Electric Membership Corp., 222 Tenn. 182 , 434 S.W.2d 829 (Tenn.1968). … Duck River Electric Membership Cooperative v. City of Manchester, 529 S.W.2d 202 (Tenn.1975). C.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAlexander C. Wells v. James Hefner
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 3, 2006
Plaintiff then appealed the university’s decision to the Tennessee Board of Regents (Board). The Board’s Chancellor, Charles E. Smith, conducted a review and concurred with the university’s decision. … Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997). We consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and resolve all inferences in that party's favor. Godfrey v. Ruiz, 90 S.W.3d 692, 695 (Tenn. 2002).
Cited 0 timesPublished18 Tenn. App. 579 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 16, 1934
Lyons Milling Company v. Goffe & Carkener (C. C. A.), 46 Fed. (2d), 241, 247, 83 A. L. R., 501; Clews v. Jamieson, supra; Cleage v. Laidley (C. C. A., 8), 149 Fed., 346, 352 ; Browne v. Thorn (C. C. … Board of Trade of Chicago v. Christie, supra, 198 U. S. [236], 249, 25 S. Ct., 637, 639 , 49 L. Ed., 1031 .” Lyons Milling Company v. Goffe & Carkener, supra.
Cited 7 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 14, 2012
See Brown v. Brown, 281 S.W.2d 492, 497 (Tenn. 1955); Riden v. Snider, 832 S.W.2d 341, 343 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991); Scales v. Winston, 760 S.W.2d 952, 953 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1988). … Richardson v. Tenn.
Cited 0 timesPublished39 Tenn. App. 176 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 20, 1954
Brown, from the Circuit Court of Sullivan County, I think it best to state my reasons for my concurrence in the result reached in the instant case. In Kingsport Utilities, Inc., v. … These factors distinguish this case from Kingsport Utilities v. Brown.
Cited 13 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 10, 1999
As we observed in Davison v. … Boyce v. Williams, 389 S.W.2d 272, 276 (Tenn. 1965). Moreover, the reviewing court may conduct a trial on the merits. Roberts v. Brown, 310 S.W.2d 197, 206-208 (Tenn. App. 1958).
Cited 0 timesPublishedLinnell Richmond v. Tennessee Department of Correction
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 29, 2010
The petitioner inmate was convicted of a disciplinary offense by the Department of Correction disciplinary board. The inmate timely filed a petition in the trial court, challenging the legality of the board’s decision. … Brown v. Little, No. M2008-02644-COA-R3-CV, 2009 WL 2166061, at *2 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 20, 2009), perm. app. denied Jan. 25, 2010 (citing Rhoden v. State 5 (...continued) T.C.A. § 27-9-102 (2000).
Cited 0 timesPublished556 S.W.2d 546 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 25, 1977
Second, even if it were so considered, the Knox County Board of Education would not be considered a “supplier” of ditch digging. See Odum v. … Haynes (1972 W.S.Tenn.App.) 494 S.W.2d 795 , where the holding in International v. Sartain was explained and distinguished. We affirm the Trial Judge.
Cited 5 timesPublishedFred Auston Wortman, III v. Eric Shirkey
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 17, 2024
Brown v. Tennessee Title Loans, Inc., 328 S.W.3d 850, 854 (Tenn. 2010); Highwoods Props., Inc. v. City of Memphis, 297 S.W.3d at 700. … The parole board’s decision whether to grant parole is reviewable by writ of certiorari “to determine whether the Board has exceeded its jurisdiction, or has acted illegally, fraudulently or arbitrarily.” Robinson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPreston Garner v. Southern Baptist Convention
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 8, 2025
Co. v. Nichols, 569 S.W.2d 412, 420 (Tenn. 1978) (citing Brown v. First National Bank, 193 N.W.2d 547, 553 (Iowa 1972)). … Brown cites a footnote from this Court’s opinion in Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished844 S.W.2d 192 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 22, 1991
We agree with Roberts’ statement of the law, see Goodwin v. Metropolitan Board of Health, 656 S.W.2d 383, 388 (Tenn.Ct.App.1983). … First Tennessee National Bank Ass’n v. Jones, 732 S.W.2d 281, 288 (Tenn.Ct.App.1987) (citing Southern Railway *197 Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 682 S.W.2d 196, 199 (Tenn.1984)).
Cited 8 timesPublishedSteven C. Mohn, et ux v. Bernard Graff
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 31, 2000
Cureton died and his property was devised to Burrel Kent Brown. In October, 1996, Brown conveyed Tract 1 of the Cureton property, including Lot 91, to the sellers. … In Price & Price Mechanical, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGerald Kiner v. Shelby County Government Public Records Department
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 29, 2025
Brown v. Christian Bros. Univ., 428 S.W.3d 38, 46 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). This Court has held that “[p]arties who choose to represent themselves are entitled to fair and equal treatment by the courts.” Hodges v. Tenn. … The Board of Judicial Conduct (the “Board”) “is typically the proper forum for complaints against judges.” Bush, 631 S.W.3d at 13; see also Tenn. Code Ann. § 17-5-102(c).
Cited 0 timesPublishedRoyal Insurance v. R & R Drywall and Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 6, 2003
See Memphis Publishing Co. v. Cherokee Children & Family Services, Inc., 87 S.W.3d 67 (Tenn. 2002); Brown v. Birman Managed Care, Inc., 42 S.W.3d 62 (Tenn. 2001). … Roberts v. Lebanon Appliance Service Co., 779 S.W.2d 793 (Tenn. 1989); Lindsey v. Smith and Johnson, Inc., 601 S.W.2d 923 (Tenn. 1980).
Cited 0 timesPublishedLeonora Washington v. Gale Vogel, Ph.D.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 20, 2011
Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208, 211 (Tenn.1993). … See Sullivan v.
Cited 0 timesPublished21 Tenn. App. 512 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 27, 1937
Eager v. McCoy, 143 Tenn., 693 , 228 S. W., 709 ; Yarbrough v. Yarbrough, 151 Tenn., 221 , 269 S. W., 36 ; Brown v. Brown, 86 Tenn., 277 , 6 S. W. 869 , 7 S. W., 640 ; Davis v. Williams, 85 Tenn., 646 , 4 S. … Brown v. Brown, 86 Tenn., 277, 293 , 6 S. W., 869 , 7 S. W., 640 . The fact that some of the limitations are void for remoteness cannot impair the validity of those which may vest. Armstrong v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedRodney Glover v. Tennessee Department of Correction
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 9, 2015
If the agency or board has reached its decision in a constitutional or lawful manner, then the decision would not be subject to judicial review. Powell v. … Brown v. Christian Bros. University, No. W2012–01336–COA–R3–CV, 2013 WL 3982137, at *3 (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 5, 2013), perm. app. denied (Tenn. Jan. 15, 2014).
Cited 0 timesPublishedWhite v. Premier Medical Group
254 S.W.3d 411 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 28, 2007
Knoxville Traction Co. v. Brown, 89 S.W. 319, 321 (Tenn. 1905); Fuller v. Tennessee-Carolina Transp. Co., 471 S.W.2d 953, 956 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1970). … See Biscan v. Brown, 160 S.W.3d 462, 468 (Tenn. 2005). Such decisions are reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard. Id.
Cited 14 timesPublished
Ask Donna