Case law

Angela Hogan v. Rex Reese and Sonya M. Reese

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 31, 1998

While Eaton v. … Williams v. Brown, Tenn. 1993, 860 S.W.2d 854, 857. Husted v. Echols, 919 S.W.2d 43, 45 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). See also Prince v. St. Thomas Hospital, 945 S.W.2d 731, 735 (Tenn. App. 1996).

L.J. Jackson v. CitiMortgage, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 31, 2017

Greeze v. Tennessee Farmers Mut. Ins. Co., No. E2016-00792-COA-R3-CV, 2017 WL 1163680, at *4 (citing Estate of Brown, 402 S.W.3d 193, 198 (Tenn. 2013)). … Amacher v. Brown–Forman Corp., 826 S.W.2d 480, 482 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991); see also Smith v. Hi-Speed, Inc., No. W2015-01613-COA-R3-CV, 2016 WL 4546057, at *19 (Tenn. Ct. App.

Outpost Solar, LLC v. Henry, Henry & Underwood, P. C.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 17, 2021

He negotiated the lease terms with Dan Speer, executive secretary for the Industrial Development Board of the City of Pulaski and Giles County, Tennessee (the “IDB”). Mr. … Cherry v. Williams, 36 S.W.3d 78, 83 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).

In Re: Estate of James Edgar Miller

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 22, 2013

See also Lichtenwalter v. … Co. v. Rotches Pork Packers, Inc., 969 F.2d 1384, 1388 (2d Cir. 1992) (emphasis added). In Caldwell v.

Howard Levy v. James Franks

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 6, 2024

Brown v. Brown, 577 S.W.3d 206, 213 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). … Bain v.

Kina Crider v. The County of Henry, Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 19, 2005

Huntington Nat’l Bank v. Hooker, 840 S.W.2d 916, 922 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991); see also Tenn. R. App. … Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Miller, 491 S.W.2d 85 (Tenn. 1973). Williamson County Broad. Co. v.

State of Tennessee, Ex Rel. Herbert H. Slatery, III v. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 13, 2019

Leggett v. Duke Energy Corp., 308 S.W.3d 843, 853 (Tenn. 2010) (quoting Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp., 331 U.S. 218, 230 (1947)). … See Jackson v. Gen. Motors Corp., 770 F. Supp. 2d 570, 576 (S.D.N.Y. 2011), aff’d sub nom. Butnick v. Gen. Motors Corp., 472 F.

Jamie Treadwell v. Gary Thomas Lamb

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 10, 2017

McFarland v. McFarland, No. M2005-01260-COA-R3-CV, 2007 WL 2254576, at *6 (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 6, 2007). First, the contributions must be “real and significant.” Id.; Brown [v. … Brown], 913 S.W.2d [163, 167 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994)]. “Second, there must be some link between the spouses‟ contributions and the appreciation in the value of the separate property.”

In the Matter of: K.H., S.F., A.F., & W.F.,Tarra Howell and Dennis Lee Moody v. Tanya Dee Ballard and Johnny Freeman

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 15, 2009

Mother later testified that Eric Brown is the biological father of S.F. and that Danny Scott is the biological father of K.H. … Bruce v. Bruce, 801 S.W.2d 102, 104 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1990). Because of Tenn.

Gentry v. McCain

329 S.W.3d 786 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 6, 2010

To begin, we note that Roane County v. Anderson County was a case wherein one county sued another county. Id. Thus, Roane County v. … [The Gentrys] believe this is what Chancellor Brown held in his Memorandum and Orders of 1999 and 2000.” The Gentrys are wrong. In Gentry v.

John Allen Construction, LLC v. Jerome Hancock, Sandra Hancock, and Carroll Bank and Trust

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 31, 2010

Meighan v. U.S. Sprint Commc’ns Co., 924 S.W.2d 632, 639 (Tenn. 1996) (citing Landers v. Jones, 872 S.W.2d 674 (Tenn.1994)). … Young v. Brown, No. 01A01-9310-CH-00440, 1994 WL 196433 (Tenn. Ct. App. May 20, 1994), involved a similar scenario. In Young, the plaintiff subcontractor filed a lien on the defendant landowners’ property.

Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Johnson

989 S.W.2d 710 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 21, 1998

In American Telephone and Telegraph Co. v. … Franchise Tax Board], 463 U.S. [159] at 164, 103 S.Ct. [2933] at 2939, 77 L.Ed.2d [545] at 552. AT & T v. Huddleston, 880 S.W.2d 682, 689 (Tenn.Ct.App.1994).

Mihir Kishorchandra Patel v. Janki Anil Patel

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 15, 2019

Wright v. Wright, 337 S.W.3d 166, 176 (Tenn. 2011); Henderson v. SAIA, Inc ., 318 S.W.3d 328, 335 (Tenn. 2010)). … The undisputed evidence shows that while Husband was taking his boards, Wife and her family provided Husband’s sole financial support.

Eatherly Constraction Co. v. Department of Labor & Workforce Development

232 S.W.3d 731 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 29, 2006

However, the trial court may not substitute its judgment concerning the weight of the evidence for that of the Board. Jones v. Bureau of TennCare, 94 S.W.3d 495, 501 (Tenn.Ct.App.2002) (citing Gluck v. Civil Serv. … See New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. Sec’y of Labor, 88 F.3d 98 (2nd Cir.1996); Daniel Int’l Corp. v. OSHRC, 683 F.2d 361 (11th Cir.1982); H.B. Zachry Co. v.

Burchfield v. Hodges

29 Tenn. App. 488 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 14, 1946

Edgcomb v. Clough, 275 Pa. 90 , 118 A. 610 . … See Ballard v. Farley, 143 Tenn. 161 , 226 S. W. 544 ; Hicks v. Sprankle, 149 Tenn. 310 , 257 S. W. 1044 ; Simpson v. Simpson, 160 Tenn. 645 , 28 S. W. (2d) 349 ; Trapp v. McCormick, 175 Tenn. 1 , 130 S. W. (2d) 122 .

Tennesseans For Sensible Election Laws v. Herbert H. Slatery, III

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 7, 2021

Purpose LLC v. … Brown v. Tennessee Title Loans, Inc., 328 S.W.3d 850, 860 (Tenn. 2010). Significantly, the enforcement mechanism outlined in § 2-19-142 is limited to criminal sanctions.

Nancy J. Strong v. John H. Baker, III, Esq.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 31, 2008

P.C. v. … Brown, 955 3 Our reference to these claims should not be interpreted as suggesting that the plaintiff is or is not entitled to recover damages for these injuries in a legal malpractice claim.

Thompson v. Adcox

63 S.W.3d 783 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 13, 2001

Massengale v. Massengale, 915 S.W.2d 818, 819 (Tenn.Ct.App.1995); Bowman v. Bowman, 836 S.W.2d 563, 566 (Tenn.Ct.App.1991). III. A. … .”); Allied Color Corp. v.

American Excavators, LLC. v. RCR Building Corporation

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 4, 2003

P. 13(d); Bogan v. Bogan, 60 S.W.3d 721, 727 (Tenn. 2001). A trial court's conclusions of law are subject to a de novo review with no presumption of correctness. S. Constructors, Inc. v. … Seals v. England/Corsair Upholstery Mfg. Co., 984 S.W.2d 912, 915 (Tenn. 1999) (quoting Collins v. Howmet Corp., 970 S.W.2d 941, 943 (Tenn.1998)).

In Re Estate of Greenamyre

219 S.W.3d 877 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 7, 2005

Citing McGee v. … Kline v. Eyrich, 69 S.W.3d 197, 204 (Tenn.2002); State v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 18 S.W.3d 186, 194 (Tenn.2000); Elliott v. Elliott, 149 S.W.3d 77, 88 (Tenn.Ct.App.2004).