Case law

Gary Wayne Garrett v. Tennessee Board of Parole

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 22, 2021

The grant of parole is a discretionary matter, vested exclusively in the Board. Doyle v. Hampton, 340 S.W.2d 891, 893 (Tenn. 1960). … Young v. Barrow, 130 S.W.3d 59, 63 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003) (citing Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000); Paehler v. Union Planters Nat’l Bank, Inc., 971 S.W.2d 393, 397 (Tenn. Ct.

Harrison Construction Co. v. Gibson County Board of Education

642 S.W.2d 148 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 28, 1982

Woodroof v. City of Nashville, (1946) 183 Tenn. 483 , 192 S.W.2d 1013 . … In the petition counsel invites the Court’s attention to the case of Keeble v. City of Alcoa, (1958) 204 Tenn. 286 , 319 S.W.2d 249 .

Woods v. Metropolitan Development & Housing Authority Board of Commissioners

345 S.W.3d 903 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 5, 2011

WOODS v. … Furthermore, the reservation of a “unilateral right” in favor of the Board to alter or amend the handbook contradicts an intent to be contractually bound by its provisions. Flowers v.

Blackwood Bros. Evangelistic Ass'n v. State Board of Equalization

614 S.W.2d 364 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 19, 1980

Peabody College v. State Board of Equalization, 219 Tenn. 123 , 407 S.W.2d 443 (1966), and the interference with the church’s affairs which the Board’s definition might mandate in order to come within the exemption. … Nashville v. Board of Equalization, 210 Tenn. 587 , 360 S.W.2d 458 (1961). Therefore we conclude that the judgment of the court below should be affirmed. AFFIRMED. TODD and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Jackie Sabaski v. Wilson County Board of Education

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 17, 2010

Jack Paul Brewer and David Randall Mantooth, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellees, Wilson County Board of Education, Selene Tinsley, Helen Daniels, Darian Brown and Travis Mayfield. … In Ronnie Lee S. v. Mingo County Board of Education, 500 S.E.2d 292, 299 (W.

Larry Hendricks v. Tennessee Board of Probation & Parole

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 25, 2011

Aug. 13, 2010) (citing Brown v. Tenn. Bd. of Probation and Parole, No. M2005-00449-COA-R3-CV, 2007 WL 2097548, at *1 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 6, 2007); Baldwin v. Tenn. Bd. of Paroles, 125 S.W.3d 429, 433 (Tenn. Ct. … “The grant of parole is a discretionary matter, vested exclusively in the Board of Paroles.” Baldwin v. Tenn. Bd. of Paroles, 125 S.W.3d 429, 433 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003) (citing Doyle v.

Richard Randall v. Shelby County Unified School Board (inclusive of the former Memphis City Schools Board of Education)

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 19, 2013

; (v) The board shall hear the appeal on the record and no new evidence shall be introduced. … P. 13(d); Ripley v. Anderson County Bd. of Educ., 293 S.W.3d 154, 156 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). We review the trial court’s determinations on matters of law de novo, with no presumption of correctness. Allmand v.

PP & C, Inc. v. Metropolitan Beer Permit Board

833 S.W.2d 90 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 29, 1992

Assuming that the beer board did violate the Open Meetings Act, the board’s decision is not before us. Questions raised before the board have all been tried again and found against the appellants. … V.

James LaFayette Moore v. Turney Center Disciplinary Board

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 7, 2010

“Board”), its members, the warden, and the TDOC commissioner. … Moore v. State of Tennessee, Wayne County Circuit Court case number 13753; James L. Moore v. State of Tennessee, Tennessee Claims Commission case number 500464; and James L. Moore v.

Gerald Harris v. Tennessee Board of Probation & Parole

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 13, 2010

The entity empowered with the discretion and authority to determine whether an inmate will receive parole is the Board of Probation and Parole, not the judiciary. Brown v. Tenn. Bd. of Probation and Parole, No. … Brown, 2007 WL 2097548, at *1 (citing Baldwin, 125 S.W.3d at 433). The scope of this review is “very narrow.” Powell v. Parole Eligibility Review Bd., 879 S.W.2d 871, 873 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994).

Rachel Sumner v. Metropolitan Nashville Board of Health

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 27, 2009

, Gallatin Housing Auth. v. … State v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 18 S.W.3d 186, 193 (Tenn. 2000); Ford Consumer Fin. Co. v. Clay, 984 S.W.2d 615, 616 (Tenn. Ct. -6- App.1998).

General Securities Co. v. Sunday School Pub. Board, Inc.

22 Tenn. App. 590 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 10, 1938

These three suits were brought by the General Securities Company against the Sunday School Publishing Board, Inc., in the Court of General Sessions to recover on three notes for $500 each. … Code, sec. 7382; Hight v. McCulloch, 150 Tenn., 117, 126 , 263 S. W., 794 ; Frazier v. Galbraith, 3 Tenn. App., 302 ; Davis v. Union Planters N. B. & Tr. Co., 171 Tenn., 383, 385 , 103 S. W. (2d), 579 .

State Personnel Recruiting Services Board v. Horne

732 S.W.2d 289 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 3, 1987

See Livesay v. Tennessee Board of Examiners in Watchmaking, 204 Tenn. 500 , 322 S.W.2d 209 (1959); State v. Bookkeepers Business Service Company, 53 Tenn.App. 350 , 382 S.W.2d 559 (1964). … McDonald v. Board of Election Commissioners, 394 U.S. 802 , 89 S.Ct. 1404 , 22 L.Ed.2d 739 (1969).

Steele v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals

841 S.W.2d 324 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 29, 1992

At the same time, the University sought a conditional use permit from the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals. … See Smith v. Lansden, 212 Tenn. 543 , 370 S.W.2d 557 (1963).

Cagle v. Wheeler

35 Tenn. App. 53 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 26, 1951

As held by the Supreme Court in Davis v. … City of Denver v. Spencer, 34 Colo. 270 , 82 P. 590 , 2 L. R. A., N. S., 147, 7 Ann. Cas. 1042; Ross v. City of Madison, 1 Ind. 281 , 48 Am. Dec. 361 ; Gilmer v. School District No. 26, 41 Okl. 12 , 136 P. 1086 , 50 L.

Bedford County Board of Education v. Harris

763 S.W.2d 750 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 5, 1988

Board. … The Board next contends that the defendant is not an employee of the Board because he is not selected by the Board, but is elected by the people, citing State v. Yoakum, 201 Tenn. 180 , 297 S.W.2d 635 (1956).

David Brown v. Ruth Johnson, Commissioner, TN Dept. of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 19, 2001

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 8, 2001 Session DAVID BROWN v. … In James v.

Memphis Education Ass'n v. Board of Education

706 S.W.2d 88 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 7, 1985

The chancellor held that the Education Professional Negotiations Act (Act) did not apply to the defendant Board and, on motion of the Board, dismissed the plaintiff’s lawsuit. … The issue to be decided is whether the above quoted section removes the Board from the provisions of the Act. The section was considered in the case of Carter County Bd. of Ed. Com’rs v.

Mumford v. BOARD OF ED. OF CITY OF MEMPHIS

173 S.W.3d 452 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 25, 2004

P. 13(d); Waldron v. Delffs, 988 S.W.2d 182, 184 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998); Sims v. Stewart, 973 S.W.2d 597, 599-600 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). … Brown, 727 S.W.2d 497 (Tenn. 1987), our Supreme Court held that T.C.A. §49-5- 511(a)(3) means that the reinstated teacher is entitled to full salary with no offset allowed. See also Bates v.

Louis M. Brunsting, III, M.D. v. Phillip P. Brown, M.D.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 4, 2001

See, Albright v. Mercer, 945 S.W.2d 749, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). … See, Alexander v. Inman, 903 S.W.2d 686 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995).