Case law

Tennessee Environmental Council v. Water Quality Control Board

250 S.W.3d 44 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 28, 2007

See Kane v. Kane, 547 S.W.2d 559, 560 (Tenn.1977); Brown v. Brown, 198 Tenn. 600 , 281 S.W.2d 492, 501 (1955). … See Caton v. Pic-Walsh Freight Co., 211 Tenn. 334 , 364 S.W.2d 931, 933 (1963); Brown v. Brown, 281 S.W.2d at 501.

Hoover, Inc. v. Metro Board of Zoning Appeals

924 S.W.2d 900 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 5, 1996

Roger’s Group, Inc. v. County of Franklin, No. 01A01-9110-CH-00378, 1992 WL 86805 , at *5 (Tenn.App.1992); see Father Ryan High School, Inc. v. City of Oak Hill, 774 S.W.2d 184, 191 (Tenn.App.1988); Merritt v. … Brooks v. Fisher, 705 S.W.2d 135, 138 (Tenn.App.1985).

MATTHEW HAWN v. SULLIVAN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 26, 2026

Brown v. Crown Equip. Corp., 181 S.W.3d 268, 273 (Tenn. 2005) (citations omitted). … Regarding its first argument, the Board cites Fowler v.

Hoover, Inc. v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals

955 S.W.2d 52 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 12, 1997

Third, we held that two Board members “acted illegally when they told board member Hoover that they would abstain if Hoover did not resign from the board.” Hoover, Inc. v. … Draper v.

Hoover v. Metropolitan Board of Housing Appeals

936 S.W.2d 950 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 1, 1996

The decision of the Board will not be disturbed unless it can be shown to be beyond its jurisdiction or not supported by material evidence in the record. Huddle-ston v. City of Murfreesboro, 635 S.W.2d 694 (Tenn.1982). … McCallen v. City of Memphis, Tenn.1990, 786 S.W.2d 633 .

Shahnaz Poursaied v. Tennessee Board of Nursing

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 14, 2021

Council v. Water Quality Control Bd., 250 S.W.3d 44, 58 (Tenn. Ct. … Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson Cnty. v. Shacklett, 554 S.W.2d 601, 604 (Tenn. 1977). Ms. Poursaied does not allege irregularities in the procedure before the Board.

Miller v. Tennessee Board of Probation & Paroles

119 S.W.3d 696 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 8, 2003

But as this court said in Kaylor v. … Further, the grant of parole in Tennessee is a discretionary matter, vested exclusively in the Board of Paroles. Doyle v. Hampton, 207 Tenn. 399 , 340 S.W.2d 891 (1960).

William W. York v. Tennessee Board Of Parole

502 S.W.3d 783 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 19, 2016

YORK v. … Weaver v.

Hemontolor v. Wilson County Board of Zoning Appeals

883 S.W.2d 613 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 18, 1994

Massey v. Shelby County Retirement Bd., 813 S.W.2d 462, 464 (Tenn.App.1991); Brooks v. Fisher, 705 S.W.2d 135, 136 (Tenn.App.1985). … The question of whether or not there is any material evidence to support the Board’s decision is one of law, to be decided by the reviewing court upon an examination of the evidence introduced before the Board. Watts v.

Childress v. Sullivan County Board of Education

771 S.W.2d 411 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 8, 1988

Given v. Low, 661 S.W.2d 687 (Tenn.App.1983). … The court should have awarded attorney fees to the Board pursuant to the provisions of the contracts. See Goings v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 491 S.W.2d 847 (Tenn.App.1972).

Bishop v. Tennessee State Board of Accountancy

905 S.W.2d 939 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 19, 1995

The Board found that Mr. … Code Ann. § 4 — 5—322(i); see also Hoover v. State Bd. of Equalization, 579 S.W.2d 192, 196-97 (Tenn.App.1978).

Ronald Moore v. Tennessee Board of Parole

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 30, 2021

Moore received the Board’s denial of his appeal.” … Instead, in responding to the Board’s motion to dismiss, Mr.

Board of Commissioners of Roane County v. Parker

88 S.W.3d 916 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 13, 2002

In Shatz , quoting Brooks v. … Browning-Ferris Indus. v. Board of Comm’rs, 806 S.W.2d 181, 187 (Tenn.Ct.App.1990) (citing Henry v. White, 194 Tenn. 192 , 250 S.W.2d 70 (1952); State ex rel. Lightman v.

Malone v. Shelby County Board of Education

773 S.W.2d 256 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 27, 1989

In Gibson v. Butler, 484 S.W.2d 356, 359 (Tenn.1972), our Supreme Court said: The Teachers’ Tenure Act provides a means by which teachers, as therein defined, of the public schools of the State acquire tenure. … In Shannon v.

Ottinger v. Cocke County Board of Education

12 Tenn. App. 532 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 1, 1931

The defense is that the school board exceeded its authority in contracting with her for $50 per month, for the State Board of Education had adopted a schedule for elementary teachers and the county board was expected to conform … This is a function of the local board over which the state does not wish to exercise control.

Joshua Hilliard v. Turney Center Disciplinary Board

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 19, 2012

App. 1999); South v. Tenn. Bd. of Paroles, 946 S.W.2d 310, 311 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996)). We do not review the correctness of the board’s decision under the common law writ of certiorari. Arnold v. Tenn. … If the agency or board has reached its decision in a constitutional or lawful manner, then the decision would not be subject to judicial review. Powell v.

Teli White v. Shelby County Board of Education

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 18, 2024

Id. at 141-42 (quoting Ripley v. Anderson Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 293 S.W.3d 154, 156 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008)). The chancery court’s review “is limited to the record of the school board proceedings.” Id. at 142. … See Finney v.

Weaver v. Knox County Board of Zoning Appeals

122 S.W.3d 781 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 30, 2003

An action by a board of zoning appeals is an administrative rather than a *784 legislative act. McCallen v. City of Memphis, 786 S.W.2d 633, 639 (Tenn.1990). … If there is no evidence to support the local board’s action, it is arbitrary. Sexton v. Anderson County Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 587 S.W.2d 663, 667 (Tenn.Ct.App.1979).

Christopher Pirtle v. Turney Center Disciplinary Board

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 11, 2013

S TANDARD OF R EVIEW The scope of review afforded by a common-law writ of certiorari is extremely limited as this court explained in Leonard Plating Co. v. … Further, a board’s decision that is based upon some material evidence is not arbitrary. Id.; Hoover Motor Exp. Co., Inc. v. Railroad and Public Utilities Comm., 261 S.W.2d 233, 239 (Tenn. 1953).

Aday v. McMinn County Board of Education

36 Tenn. App. 451 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 20, 1952

It seems that the Board thought there could be an increase of at least seven to eight per cent over the state minimum salary schedule, so, without formal action by the Board, contracts were prepared calling for approximately … The defendant Board took the position (a) that as there were no minutes of the Board showing authority for the execution of the first contract authorizing the seven or eight per cent increase, there was no contract, hence