Case law

Tony Baldwin v. Board of Paroles

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 15, 2003

The Board filed a Motion to Dismiss. The Chancery Court agreed with the Board. The court cited California Dept. of Corrections v. … Tennessee Board of Paroles, 993 S.W.2d 78 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999); Powell -4- v. Parole Eligibility Review Board, 879 S.W.2d 871 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994); Yokley v.

Eddie Phifer v. Board of Parole

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 14, 2001

This court has held that a Board of Paroles decision does not become final, for purposes of triggering the sixty-day deadline, until the Board rend ers a decision on the prisoner’s ap peal. Jordan v. … Similarly, in Knop v.

Doe a v. Coffee County Board of Education

852 S.W.2d 899 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 4, 1992

V. The remaining issue involves the school board’s and its employees’ Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-20-205(1) defense. … ;” (2) that the school board and its employees negligently failed “to implement and enforce an effective school board policy to supervise and protect the plaintiffs from sexual exploitation;” (3) that the school board and

Lori Lee Grissom (Brown) v, Jeffrey Donald Grissom

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 4, 2001

See Spalding v. Spalding, 597 S.W.2d 739 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1980); Isbell v. Isbell, 816 S.W.2d 735 (Tenn. 1991). … In Penland v.

William Garrett v. Board of Paroles

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 29, 2000

Robinson v. Traughber, 13 S.W.3d 361, 364 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999); Fite v. State Bd. of Paroles, 925 S.W.2d 543, 544 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). It is not available as a matter of right, Boyce v. … Robinson v. Traughber, 13 S.W.3d at 364.

Carlisa Elmi v. Cheatham County Board of Education

546 S.W.3d 630 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 18, 2017

See Williams v. … See Fleming v.

William Cooper v. Board of Parole

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 26, 2019

App. 2017) (citing Willis v. Tenn. Dep’t of Corr., 113 S.W.3d 706, 712 (Tenn. 2003)). The Board determines whether an inmate “should be granted parole,” not the courts. Bibbs v. Tenn. Bd. of Parole, No. … “Judicial review of a parole decision made by the Board is narrow; it is limited to consideration of whether the Board exceeded its jurisdiction or acted illegally, arbitrarily, or fraudulently.” Brennan v.

Rickey Cotten v. Board of Paroles

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 13, 2001

(quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577, 92 S. Ct. 2701, 2709 (1972)). … V. Conclusion Mr.

Sharon Faye Brown Hartman v. Leonard Lee Hartman

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 20, 2001

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 9, 2001 Session SHARON FAYE BROWN HARTMAN v. … Slagle, Johnson City, Tennessee, for the Appellee, Sharon Faye Brown Hartman.

Moss v. TN Board of Paroles

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 28, 2000

Code Ann. § 40-28-117(a) (1997); Graham v. State, 304 S.W.2d 622, 623-24 (Tenn. 1957). A decision to grant parole is discretionary, and in the sole prerogative of the Tennessee Board of Paroles. See Tenn. … In order to obtain relief via the writ, the petitioner must establish that the Board exceeded its jurisdiction or acted illegally, fraudulently, or arbitrarily. See Arnold v.

J.D. Hickman v. Board of Parole

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 31, 2002

Webber v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 49 S.W.3d 265, 269 (Tenn. 2001); Brown v. Birman Managed Care, Inc., 42 S.W.3d 62, 66 (Tenn. 2001); Goodloe v. State, 36 S.W.3d 62, 65 (Tenn. 2001). … V. The Board’s Justifications As stated earlier, the Board has the burden of justifying a denial of access. In response to Mr.

Iva Dell Brown McAlexander v. Kenneth Jackson McAlexander

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 2, 1997

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE, WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON _______________________________________________________ ) IVA DELL BROWN McALEXANDER … Hass v. Knighton, 676 S.W.2d 554, 555 (Tenn. 1984); Ruyle v. Ruyle, 928 S.W.2d 439, 441 (Tenn. App. 1996); Koch v. Koch, 874 S.W.2d 571, 575 (Tenn. App. 1993).

Joseph Heintz v. Tennessee State Board of Equalization

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 13, 2026

Co. v. State, 33 S.W.3d 727, 729 (Tenn. 2000), and, therefore, should be viewed as a threshold inquiry. Schmidt v. … Dishmon v. Shelby State Cmty. Coll., 15 S.W.3d 477, 480-81 (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 15, 1999) (citing National Health Corp. v. Snodgrass, 555 S.W.2d 403, 405-06 (Tenn.1997); Mid-South Indoor Horse Racing, Inc. v. Tenn.

William Wyatt v. Board of Paroles

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 14, 2000

M1999-00472-COA-R3-CV - Filed November 26, 2002 This appeal involves a dispute between a state prisoner and the Tennessee Board of Paroles over the Board’s decision not to parole him in 1998. … Knott v. Stewart County, 185 Tenn. 623, 626, 207 S.W.2d 337, 338-39 (1948); Ford Consumer Fin. Co. v. Clay, 984 S.W.2d 615, 616 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998); Massengill v. Massengill, 36 Tenn.

Humphreys County Board of Education v. Logan

622 S.W.2d 553 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 13, 1981

transferred to Waverly Central High School and to dismiss its appeal in Hatcher v. … We are further of the opinion that the language of McKenna v. Sumner County Board of Education, supra, does not lend itself to the kind of limitation desired by the Board.

Mohamed Ali v. Board of Paroles

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 31, 2001

Hudson, Senior Counsel, for the appellee, Tennessee Board of Paroles. … Greenholtz v. Inmates of Neb. Penal and Corr. Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 7-8 (1979). There is no constitutionally protected liberty interest in parole in Tennessee. Wright v. Trammell, 810 F.2d 589 (6th Cir. 1987); Kaylor v.

Turner v. TN Board of Paroles

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 18, 1999

Powell v. Parole Eligibility Review Board, 879 S.W.2d 871 (Tenn. App. 1994). The intrinsic correctness of the Board’s decision is not reviewable under the writ. Arnold v. … Turner’s rights with the Rules of the Board of Paroles. See Wells v. Tennessee Board of Paroles, 909 S.W.2d 826 (Tenn. App. 1995).

Tusculum College v. State Board of Equalization

600 S.W.2d 739 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 28, 1980

Appellant also cites Vanderbilt University v. … This Court is not in position to reverse the factual finding of the Board in order to invoke the dicta of State ex rel. v. Waggoner, supra.

Case v. Shelby County Civil Service Merit Board

98 S.W.3d 167 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 19, 2002

See Brewster v. Board of Educ., 149 F.3d 971 , 986 (9th Cir.1998). … Case cites Goodwin v. Metropolitan Board of Health, 656 S.W.2d 383 (Tenn.Ct.

Joseph Beaucamp v. Board of Paroles

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 26, 1999

Courts may not (1) inquire into the intrinsic correctness of the Board’s decisions, Arnold v. Tennessee Bd. of Paroles, 956 S.W.2d 478, 480 (Tenn. 1997); Powell v. … App. 1994), (2) reweigh the evidence considered by the Board, Watts v. Civil Serv. Bd., 606 S.W.2d 274, 277 (Tenn. 1980); Hoover, Inc. v. Metropolitan Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 924 S.W.2d 900, 904 (Tenn. Ct.