Case law

Doug Zukowski Ex Rel. Taylor Alexander Zukowski v. Hamilton County Department of Education

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 28, 2021

TAYLOR ALEXANDER ZUKOWSKI v. … Two policies were entered into the record as exhibits—Hamilton County Board of Education Policy 5.500 and Policy 6.304.

Luther Kirkwood v. Shelby County Government, d/b/a Shelby County Sheriff's Department, Jail Division

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 6, 2006

Rowe v. Board of Educ. of Chattanooga, 938 S.W.2d 351, 354 (Tenn.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1128, 117 S.Ct. 1271, 137 L.Ed.2d 349 (1997) (citing Board of Regents of State Colleges v. … v.

McCluen v. Roane County Times, Inc.

936 S.W.2d 936 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 9, 1996

McCluen’s father as Chairman of the Harriman Hospital Board and that Mr. McCluen had brought to the attention of the County Commission in its July 12,1993, meeting that Mr. … v.

Kerrigan Iron Works, Inc. v. Cook Truck Lines, Inc.

41 Tenn. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 29, 1956

A. of L., Local 232 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 336 U. S. 245, 253 , 69 S. Ct. 516 , 93 L. Ed. 651 , 662; Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111, U. E. R. M. W. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 315 U. … W. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, supra, 336 U. S. 254 , 69 S. Ct. 521 , 93 L.

Hood v. Waldrum

58 Tenn. App. 512 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 29, 1968

Brown v. … The defendants were entitled to have the jury charged in general terms in accordance with the holding of Brown v.

Butler v. Eureka Security Fire Marine Ins. Co.

21 Tenn. App. 97 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 10, 1937

Code, sec. 10563; Wright v. Dorman, 155 Tenn., 189 , 291 S. W., 1064 ; Fonville v. Gregory, 162 Tenn., 294 , 36 S. W. (2d) 900 . … school board.

Camurati v. Sutton

48 Tenn. App. 54 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 29, 1960

Cude v. Culbertson, supra; Knoxville Traction Co. v. Brown, 115 Tenn. 323, 331 , 89 S. W. 319 , 321; Curry v. Bridges, 45 Tenn. App. 395 , 325 S. W. (2d) 87, 91 . Material evidence is defined in Cude v. … Knoxville Traction Co. v. Brown, 115 Tenn. 323, 331 , 89 S. W. 319 , 321.

Davis v. Allen

43 Tenn. App. 278 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 3, 1957

This act replaced prior laws, created the Board to administer it, defined the practice of public accountancy, prescribed the qualifications therefor, provided the Board should issue a certificate of license to persons qualified … State v. De Verges, 153 La. 349 , 95 So. 805 , 27 A. L. R. 1526; Wangerin v. Wisconsin State Board of Accountancy, 223 Wis. 179 , *284 270 N. W. 57 ; Heller v.

First American National Bank v. DeWitt

511 S.W.2d 698 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 17, 1974

Counsel quote from Breeding v. Williams, 9 Tenn.App. 335 (339-340), as follows : “Quoting from Milligan v. Greenville College, supra: “‘In Johnson v. … Pierce v.

Charles Patterson v. Tennessee Department of Correction

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 20, 2010

Appellant appealed the Board’s decision to Warden Tommy Mills, who affirmed the Board’s finding of guilt. … Pursuant to Wolff v.

Melissa Michelle Cox v. M. A. Primary

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 30, 2009

Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1977). We consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and resolve all inferences in that party’s favor. Stovall v. … Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d at 210; EVCO Corp. v. Ross, 528 S.W.2d 20, 25 (Tenn. 1975).

Holly Castle, Individually and as next friend of Emily Castle, a minor child, and Jana Clark v. David Dorris Logging, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 11, 2013

Earls, 2011 WL 3481007, at *5 (citing Brown v. Brown, 281 S.W.2d 492, 497 (Tenn. 1955)). … App. 1896); Brown & Reid v. Bigley, 3 Tenn. Ch. at 626.

Sherman Henderson v. Charles Traughber

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 28, 2003

Parole decisions of Tennessee prisoners lie exclusively within the discretion of the Board of Paroles. Doyle v. Hampton, 340 S.W.2d 891 (Tenn. 1960). … Moreover, the Board is not required to define with exactitude the weight accorded the seriousness of the offense factor in denying parole. Greenholz v.

William M. Hensley v. Robert Carrier

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 9, 2006

Brown and therefore the garage belonged to his sister, …. … Collins v. Smithson, 585 S.W.2d 598, 603 (Tenn. 1979); Bennett v. Langham, 214 Tenn. 674, 383 S.W.2d 16, 18 (1964). Interpretation of a deed is a question of law. Rodgers v.

Franklin Capital Associates, L.P. v. Almost Family, Inc. f/k/a Caretenders Health Corporation

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 29, 2005

Code Ann. §§ 48-18-301(a), -403(a) (1995)); also citing Neese v. Brown, 405 S.W.2d 577, 580 (Tenn. 1964)). … Accordingly, our courts have declined to substitute their judgment for that of a corporation's board of directors when the board has acted in good faith and in the exercise of honest judgment in the lawful and legitimate

City of Memphis v. Qualls

16 Tenn. App. 387 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 24, 1933

If the action of the board of adjustment is to be sustained, it must be done under said item 67 of zone D, above quoted. In the case of Spencer-Sturla Co. v. City of Memphis, 155 Tenn., 70 , 290 S. … Citing Davidson v. New Orleans, 96 U. S., 97 [ 24 L. Ed., 616 ]; Yick v. Hopkins, 118 U. S., 356 [ 6 S. Ct., 1064 , 30 L.

Marshall H. Murdock v. State of Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 13, 2011

The Court explained that parole decisions were discretionary and were the prerogative of the Tennessee Board of Paroles, citing Tenn. Code Ann. §40-28-116(a)(1) and State ex rel. Ivey v. Meadows, 393 S.W.2d 744 (1965). … . §4-5-106(c), such that the proper procedural vehicle for prisoners to seek review of decisions of the parole board was through a common law writ of certiorari, citing Rhoden v. TDOC, 984 S.W.2d 955 (Tenn. Ct.

Pritchett-Thomas Co. v. Pennebaker

10 Tenn. App. 425 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 20, 1929

the discretion of the board. … Reed v. Estes, 113 Tenn., 200, 203 , 80 S. W., 1086 .

Johnson v. Graves

15 Tenn. App. 466 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 27, 1932

Harry Brown testified that he conducted a pressing shop in the same building where deceased’s barber shop was. … The boarding-house belonged to defendant, and he must have contributed something, both in labor and supplies, if not money.

In Re Estate of David R. Leath

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 20, 2008

Sanders v. McClanahan, 442 S.W.2d 664, 667 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1969) (citing Haven v. Wrinkle, 195 S.W.2d 787, 793 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1946)). As noted by this Court in Shrum v. Powell, 604 S.W.2d 869, 871 (Tenn. Ct. … Again, the appellants seek to rely upon Brown, ibid., in support of their argument and again, we find a clear distinction between Brown and this case.