Case law

In re All Assessments

67 S.W.3d 805 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 14, 2001

v. … Carroll v.

Baldovin v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 19, 1997

The Court finds that Tennessee Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA) is not applicable to the instant case, and the facts in the case of Brown v. … As of this time, Brown v.

Huntsville Utility District of Scott County v. General Trust Co.

839 S.W.2d 397 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 6, 1992

Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 209 Tenn. 177, 182 , 352 S.W.2d 217, 219 (1961); Love v. Cave, 622 S.W.2d 52, 55 (Tenn.App.1981). … Huntsville also relies on Shelby County Board of Commissioners v. Shelby County Quarterly Court, 216 Tenn. 470 , 392 S.W.2d 935 (1965), and Coleman v. Henry, 184 Tenn. 550 , 201 S.W.2d 686 (1947).

Johnson v. Bible

707 S.W.2d 510 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 25, 1985

We agree with the Commissioner that only the Board of Review can set the attorney fees. In Queener v. … APPENDIX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON JOSEPHINE BANKS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellant.

Tennessee Department of Safety ex rel. Charles A. Harmon v. Carltone E. Bryant, IV

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 14, 2012

Tennessee Code Annotated section 4-5-102 defines “agency” as follows: As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires: *** (2) “Agency” means each state board … Hunt v. Genie Indus., Inc., 202 S.W.3d 99, 102 (Tenn. 2006). Thus, in statutory construction, we “must give effect to every word, phrase, clause and sentence.” Brown v. Tenn.

In re Avery B.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 2, 2015

Courts derive their subject matter jurisdiction from the Constitution of Tennessee or from legislative act, see Kane v. Kane, 547 S.W.2d 559, 560 (Tenn.1977); Brown v. … See Caton v. Pic–Walsh Freight Co., 211 Tenn. 334, 338, 364 S.W.2d 931, 933 (1963); Brown v. Brown, 198 Tenn. at 618–19, 281 S.W.2d at 501. Dishmon v. Shelby State Cmty. Coll., 15 S.W.3d 477, 480 (Tenn. Ct.

State of Tennessee v. Zachery Brandon

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 10, 2022

.”); State v. Evans, 838 S.W.2d 185, 190-92 (Tenn. 1992); State v. Anderson, 835 S.W.2d 600, 604 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1992). … State v. Smith, 24 S.W.3d 274, 282 (Tenn. 2000) (quoting State v. Adkisson, 899 S.W.2d 626, 641–42 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994)).

Shelby County Sheriff's Department v. Mark Lowe

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 11, 2008

s determinations be filed within thirty (30) days of the Board’s order.3 Case v. … v.

Acute Care Holdings, LLC v. Houston County, Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 3, 2019

.; -6- Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50 (Tenn. 1997). … Godfrey v. Ruiz, 90 S.W.3d 692, 695 (Tenn. 2002).

John R. Wills, Jr. v. The City of Memphis

457 S.W.3d 30 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 13, 2014

A court reviewing the decision of a local board is not permitted to re-weigh the evidence, Watts v. Civil Serv. … Further, in Hoover, Inc. v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals for Davidson County, 955 S.W.2d 52 (Tenn. Ct.

Galadriel Basham, Individually and as Next-Of-Kin of Baby Girl Basham v. Mark K. Greaves, M.D.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 11, 2006

she is board- certified should be judged by the standard of care required by the certifying board. … It should also be noted that the Court has additionally stated in Chapman v. Bearfield, No. E2004-02596-SC-R11CV, 2006 W L 3162923, at *3 (Tenn.

John Durling Kemper v. Joe C. Baker, individually and in his capacity as City Manager of Berry Hill, Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 19, 2012

Brown v. Hamilton Cnty, 126 S.W.3d 43, 46 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003) (citing Fretwell v. Chaffin, 652 S.W.2d 755, 756 (Tenn. 1983)). The GTLA “reaffirms and codifies” this general rule, Ezell v. … Matthews v. Pickett Cnty, 996 S.W.2d 162, 164-65 (Tenn. 1999); see also Chase v.

Antonio Wyatt 291749 v. Tennessee Department of Correction

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 24, 2013

S TANDARD OF R EVIEW The disciplinary board’s action is reviewed through the common-law writ of certiorari. Rhoden v. State Dep’t of Corr., 984 S.W.2d 955 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). … P. 13(d); Whaley v. Perkins, 197 S.W.3d 665, 670 (Tenn. 2006); Union Carbide Corp. v. Huddleston, 854 S.W.2d 87, 91 (Tenn. 1993). III. D ISCUSSION Mr.

Aretha Moss v. Shelby County Division of Corrections

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 11, 2013

Barnes v. Barnes, 193 S.W.3d 495, 501 (Tenn. 2006); Wickham v. Sovereign Homes, LLC, No. W2011–02508–COA–R3–CV), 2012 WL 438635, at *10 (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 25, 2012) (no perm. app. filed). Although, as Ms. … Richardson v. Tennessee Bd. of Dentistry, 913 S.W.2d 446, 453 (Tenn. 1995)(citations omitted).

Jeremy White v. Warden Tommy Mills, Disciplinary Chairperson Sgt. Joe Spicer, and Sgt. Joel Smith

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 14, 2009

Review is limited to whether “the inferior board or tribunal (1) has exceeded its jurisdiction, or (2) has acted illegally arbitrarily, or fraudulently.” McCallen v. … TDOC Policy No. 502.01(V). Id. at 713.

Shirleen Nevels v. Joseph Contarino, M.D.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 16, 2012

Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50 (Tenn. 1997). We consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and resolve all inferences in that party’s favor. Godfrey v. … Brown v. Crown Equip. Corp., 181 S.W.3d 268, 273 (Tenn. 2005); Mercer v. Vanderbilt Univ., Inc., 134 S.W.3d 121, 131 (Tenn. 2004).

Clark v. Lincoln County

54 Tenn. App. 13 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 26, 1964

Tomlinson v. Board of Equalization, 88 Tenn. 1 [ 12 S.W. 414 , 6 L.R.A. 207 ]; Treadwell Realty Company v. City of Memphis [ 173 Tenn. 168 ] 116 S.W.(2d) 997 . … As was held in Treadwell Realty Co. v. City of Memphis, 173 Tenn. 168 , 116 S.W.(2d) 997 , and Tomlinson v.

Barber v. Barber

28 Tenn. App. 559 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 5, 1945

In Brewies v. Brewies, 178 S. … It is next insisted that upon the'granting of the divorce the parties became tenants in common as held in *564 Ames v. Norman, 36 Tenn. 683 , 70 Am. Dec. 269 , and Brown v. Brown, 160 Tenn. 685, 687 , 28 S.

Starnes v. Newsom

1 Tenn. Ch. R. 239 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 15, 1873

Brown of the other part. … King v. Hamilton, 4 Pet. 311 ; Cathcart v. Robinson, 5 Pet. 264 ; Hudson v. King 2 Heisk. 560, 574 ; McCarty v. Kyle, 4 Cold. 349 .

Cheatham v. Cheatham

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 25, 1997

See Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 166 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994); McClellan v. McClellan, 873 S.W.2d 350, 351 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1993). Tenn. … See Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d at 169; Ingram v. Ingram, 721 S.W.2d 262, 264 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986). Even though fault is a relevant consideration when setting spousal support, see Tenn.