Case law

Hedgepath v. Norton

839 S.W.2d 416 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 24, 1992

Watts v. Civil Service Board, 606 S.W.2d 274, 276-77 (Tenn.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 983 , 101 S.Ct. 1519 , 67 L.Ed.2d 818 (1981). In Pace v. … Mullins v. City of Knoxville, 665 S.W.2d 393, 396 (Tenn.App.1983).

Engert v. Peerless Insurance Company

53 Tenn. App. 310 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 26, 1964

Real Estate Management v. Giles, 41 Tenn.App. 347 , 293 S.W.(2d) 596 ; Scott v. McReynolds, 36 Tenn.App. 289 , 255 S.W.(2d) 401 ; Gibbs v Trinity Universal Ins. … Co. v.

Kobie Turner v. City of Memphis

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 20, 2016

Henley v. Amacher, No. M1999-02799-COA-R3-CV, 2002 WL 100402, at *6 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 28, 2002) (citing Brown v. Wal-Mart Discount Cities, 12 S.W.3d 785, 789 (Tenn. 2000); Turner v. … See Brown v. Wal-Mart Disc.

Sannella v. Sannella

993 S.W.2d 73 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 27, 1999

Aaron, 909 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tenn. 1995); Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 170 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994), and this court will not interfere with the trial judge’s decision unless the evidence preponderates against it. … See Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d at 170; Kincaid v. Kincaid, 912 S.W.2d 140, 144 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). Ms.

Royalton Woods Homeowner Association, Inc. v. Phillip Soholt

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 29, 2019

Id.; Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997). … Because the Board did not appoint a separate Architectural Review Committee, the Board was the “appropriate committee.”

Ford v. Traughber

813 S.W.2d 141 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 13, 1991

The Tennessee Supreme Court, in Reese v. … Relations v. Chapman, 37 Ala.App. 680 , 74 So.2d 621 (1954). See also Harris v. Woodcrest Mobile Homes, 359 So.2d 243 (La.Ct.App. 1978); Miles v. Review Bd. of Indiana Employment Sec.

Fox v. Miles

164 S.W.3d 593 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 21, 2005

Atkin v. … In Austin v. Shelby County Government Register’s Office, for example, this Court upheld the Board’s decision to reinstate the county employee and impose a lighter penalty for the employee’s insubordination. Austin v.

Boyd's Creek Enterprises, LLC. v. Sevier County, Tennessee, a Governmental Corporate Entity

362 S.W.3d 600 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 18, 2010

Adams, 571 S.W.2d at 831 (citing City of Murfreesboro v. Davis, 569 S.W.2d 805 (Tenn. 1978); Seay v. Knox Cnty. Quarterly Court, 541 S.W.2d 946 (Tenn. 1976); Serv-U-Mart, Inc. v. … -6-  V.

McRedmond v. Estate of Marianelli

46 S.W.3d 730 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 31, 2000

Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208 (Tenn.1993). … Johns v. Caldwell, 601 S.W.2d 37 (Tenn.Ct. App.1980); Aeree v. E.I.F.C., Inc., 502 S.W.2d 43 (Ky.1973). Controlling shareholders likewise owe a fiduciary duty to minority shareholders. Nelms v.

Gamblin v. Town of Bruceton

803 S.W.2d 690 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 16, 1990

In Huddleston v. … See Lansden v. Tucker, 204 Tenn. 388 , 321 S.W.2d 795 (1959).

Trails End Campground, LLC v. Brimstone Recreation, LLC

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 29, 2015

The Town’s Board of Mayor and Aldermen met on September 27, 2012. … Moreover, an examination of the resolution passed by the Board of Mayor and Aldermen reveals that the mayor did not exceed his authority granted by the board to lease the Town Square.

Marla H., Individually and as Next Best Friend to her Daughter Moriah F. H. v. Knox County

361 S.W.3d 518 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 29, 2011

Green, and Thomas Brown, the principal at HMS. The plaintiffs also entered the depositions of Drs. Lees and Paulauskas as trial exhibits. … ) -13- Biscan v. Brown, 160 S.W.3d 462, 480 (Tenn. 2005)). General foreseeability is now a threshold requirement in the duty analysis. Giggers, 277 S.W.3d at 365.

Randall v. Hankins

675 S.W.2d 712 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 24, 1984

A witness who attended most, if not all, the school board meetings testified that he never heard the plaintiffs’ names mentioned at a board meeting. … See Gibson v. Butler, 484 S.W.2d 356 (Tenn.1972). The costs of the cause are taxed to the defendants. GODDARD and FRANKS, JJ., concur.

Water Authority of Dickson County v. Gene C. Hooper, Vera S. Hooper, and Dickson County, Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 28, 2010

Dep’t of Transp., Bureau of Hwys v. Brevard, 545 S.W.2d 431 (citing Alloway, 13 S.W. 123; Davidson County Board of Education v. First American Bank, 202 Tenn. 9, 301 S.W.2d 905, 907 (1957)). … Brown, 181 S.W.3d at 273; McDaniel v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 955 S.W.2d 257 (Tenn. 1997).

In Re Carl Edwin Osborne, Jr. Living Trust -Concur in Part/Dissent in Part

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 28, 2026

App. 2005)); Brown v. Brown, No. W2009-02264-COA-R3-CV, 2011 WL 441266, at *2 (“The entire written agreement must be considered in order to ascertain the parties’ intent.”). … Mar. 29, 2010) (citing Bell v. Shannon, 367 S.W.2d 761, 766 (1963)); see Brown, 2011 WL 441266, at *2. We “should reject no word or clause that can be reasonably reconciled with the remainder” of the trust.

Water Authority of Dickson County v. Charles B. Hooper, Gene C. Hooper, and Dickson County, Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 28, 2010

Dep’t of Transp., Bureau of Hwys v. Brevard, 545 S.W.2d 431 (citing Alloway, 13 S.W. 123; Davidson County Board of Education v. First American Bank, 202 Tenn. 9, 301 S.W.2d 905, 907 (1957)). … Brown, 181 S.W.3d at 273; McDaniel v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 955 S.W.2d 257 (Tenn. 1997).

Stephanie Dubois v. Radwan Haykal, M.D.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 2, 2004

Id.; Brown v. Crown Equip. Corp., No. W2002-02228- COA-R3-CV, 2004 Tenn. App. LEXIS 114, at *10 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 25, 2004). … Kilpatrick v. Bryant, 868 S.W.2d 594, 598 (Tenn. 1993) (citing Cardwell v. Bechtol, 724 S.W.2d 739, 753 (Tenn. 1987); Dolan v. Cunningham, 648 S.W.2d 652, 654 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1982)).

Bishop v. Young

780 S.W.2d 746 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 30, 1989

In Browne v. Browne, Tenn.1977, 547 S.W.2d 239 , one Bettye Browne filed a claim in County (Probate) Court asserting that certain personalty in the possession of the executrix had been given to claimant by the deceased. … Browne, supra, the Supreme Court said: *750 Admittedly, the language of this Court in Dick v.

Earle v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.

25 Tenn. App. 660 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 20, 1942

Jefferson Electric Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 7 Cir., 102 F. (2d), 949; Edwards Co. v. Deihl, 160 Va., 587 , 169 S. E., 907 ; Kitty Kelly Shoe Corp. v. United Retail Employees, etc., 126 N. J. … See State v. Board of Trust, etc., 129 Tenn., 279 , 164 S. W. 1151 ; Canton Cotton Mills v. Bowman Overall Co., 149 Tenn., 18 , 257 S. W., 398 ; Sherman v. Cate, 159 Tenn., 69 , 16 S. W. (2d), 25 ; Board of Education v.

Merritt v. Merritt

10 Tenn. App. 369 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 4, 1929

In Pillow v. … Rutledge v. Rutledge, 5 Sneed, 554 ; Smith v. Smith (Chy. App.), 53. S. W., 1000; Hickerson v. Hickerson (Chy. App.), 52 S. W., 1019 . In Rutledge v.