Case law

Richardson v. Brown

2 Shan. Cas. 317 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1877

Brown v. McClanahan

2 Shan. Cas. 624 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1878

DeBord v. Brown

188 Tenn. 160 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1948

Cathcart v. Thomas, 8 Baxt. 172 , 174 [ 67 Tenn. 172, 174 ]. To the same effect, see Turney v. Denham, 4 Baxt. 569 [ 63 Tenn. 569 ]; Townsend v. Neuhardt, 139 Tenn. 695, 698 [ 203 S. W. 255 ]; Tappan v. … In Palmer v. Dehn, supra, 198 S.

Jones v. Brown

727 S.W.2d 497 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1987

Stewart v. … Chapdelaine v.

Brown v. State

159 Tenn. 422 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1929

should have been granted for newly-discovered evidence, could not he sustained he-’ cause the affidavit of plaintiff in error did not recite the exercise of diligence in his preparation for the. trial, as required by Ross v. … It was certainly unlawful for Brown to employ his pistol in making the arrest for a simple misdemeanor. This court has recently spoken on this subject in no uncertain terms. Human v. Goodman, 159 Tenn., 241 , 17 S.

Campbell v. Brown

100 Tenn. 245 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1898

Hunt v. Sanford, 6 Yer., 387 ; Merritt v. Duncan, 7 Heis., 163; Tiedeman on Commercial Paper, Sec. 291. But, conceding that Dr. … Petty v. Hannum, 2 Hum., 102 ; Holman v. Hobson, 8 Hum., 127 ; May v. Campbell, 7 Hum., 450 ; Green v. Stuart, 7 Bax., 422 ; Oppenheimer v. Bank, 13 Pickle, 34 ; 1 Daniel on Neg. Inst., Sec. 758.

Johnson v. Brown

138 Tenn. 395 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1917

Brown v. State

162 Tenn. 639 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1931

It was contemplated that he would do business under the name of Brown-Hudson-Essex Com pany and handle the cars under that name. The sale of the cars, therefore, by plaintiff in error was no breach of trust. … J., 431, and cases cited; McCrary v. State, 51 Tex. Cr., 502, 103 S. W., 924 , 123 Am. St. Rep., 905 .

Brown v. State

201 Tenn. 50 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1956

The plaintiff-in-error hereinafter referred to as the defendant, James Albert Brown, was convicted for involuntary manslaughter and his punishment fixed at 11 months and 29 days in the County Jail. … In this connection see also Bradam v. State, 191 Tenn. 626 , 235 S.W.2d 801 ; and Smith v. State, 196 Tenn, 168, 264 S.W.2d 803 .

Post v. Brown

142 Tenn. 304 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1919

Ainsworth v. Mt. Moriah Lodge, 172 Mass., 261 , 52 N. E., 81 ; Chamberlain v . Godfrey’s Adm’r 50 Ala., 530 ; McMillan v. Solomon, 42 Ala., 364 , 94 Am. Dec., 654 ; Waite v. O’Neil, 76 Fed., 408 , 22 C. C. … See in accord Humiston, Keeling & Co. v. Wheeler, 175 Ill., 514 , 51 N. E., 893 ; Conn. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. U. S., 21 Ct. Cl., 195 ; Nonotuck Silk Co. v. Shay, 37 Ill. App., 542 .

Walker v. Brown

30 Tenn. 179 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1850

This is an action of trespass brought by Brown against Walker for whipping the slave of the plaintiff. The defendant pleaded 1st.

Brown v. Timmons

110 Tenn. 148 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1902

Williams v. Whitmore, 9 Lea, 262 ; Childress v. … W., 2 ; Hughes v. Powers, 99 Tenn., 486 , 42 S. W., 1 ; Ellis v. Ins. Co., 100 Tenn., 181 , 43 S. W., 766 ; McQuade v. Williams, 101 Tenn., *156 334 , 47 S. W., 427 ; Bristol Trust Co. v.

Brown v. Haywood

51 Tenn. 357 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1871

This is an action of trover, commenced in 1865, by Brown against Haywood, for the conversion of personal property.

Gray v. Brown

188 Tenn. 152 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1948

Brown for $2,000.00, and for Mr. Brown for $1,000.00. … Brown to close the door of the fast-moving cab was the proximate, procuring cause (Grigsby & Co. v. Bratton, supra) of her injury.

McCormick v. Brown

201 Tenn. 166 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1956

Then on page 203, under the head of Application of the G-eneral Rule to-Actions of Trespass quare clausum fregit the case of Brown v. Dayton Coal & Iron Co., 1912, 3 Tenn. Civ. App. 397. … Swepston, 127 Tenn. 693 , 155 S.W. 928 , which definition was taken from the case of Livingston v.

Brown v. Stephens

165 Tenn. 85 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1932

Beginning with Griffith v. Beasly, 10 Yer., 134 , and followed in Cherry v. Hardin, 4 Heist., 190; Driver v. Arn & Card, 6 Hig., 589; Whaley v. Catlett, 103 Tenn., 347 ; Wilson v. … In concluding the opinion in this case of Rook v. Perkins, referring to the leading case of Cherry v. Hardin, supra, Mr.

Brummitt v. Brown

159 Tenn. 612 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1929

Brown to Mildred Brown Cameron is here filed as Exhibit ‘ A. ’ The grantee is a sister of the said Prank C. Brown. … In Dougherty v.

Russell v. Brown

195 Tenn. 482 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1953

Brown, tbe original tracts of land owned by K. R. Armistead. … Harrison v. Beaty, 24 Tenn. App. 13 , 137 S. W. (2d) 946, 951 ; Haynes v. Morton, 32 Tenn. App. 251, 262 , 222 S. W. (2d) 389, 394 .

Young v. Brown

136 Tenn. 184 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1916

Taul v. Campbell, 7 Yerg., 319 , 27 Am. Dec., 508 . This accounts for the language used in the reconveyance to Mrs. Brown; but, inasmuch as the conveyance to Gr. W. Brown was different, the rule could not' apply. … Voorhies v. Granberry, 5 Baxt., (64 Tenn.) 704; McFerrin v. White, 6 Cold., (46 Tenn.) 500.

Stevens v. Brown

173 Tenn. 234 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 27, 1938

This on the authority of McGee v. Fourth & *236 First National Bank, 153 Tenn., 357 , 284 S. W., 60 . In that case a demurrer was filed and no action taken by complainant for sis years. … The case of McGee v. Fourth & First National Bank was explained in Doane v. Knoxville Inv. Corp., 159 Tenn., 76 , 16 S. W. (2d), 186 .