Case law

Dennis J. Hughes v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee

259 S.W.3d 631 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 10, 2008

In Board of Professional Responsibility v. … Scope of Review for the Supreme Court The Supreme Court is the source of authority of the Board of Professional Responsibility and all of its functions. Brown v.

Balding v. Tennessee Department of Employment Security

212 Tenn. 517 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1963

George v. Brown, 144 So.2d 140, 142 (1962). The phrase relates logically to “week” and “personal services.” … The Board of Review and the Chancellor considered Meakins v.

Arrington v. Cary

64 Tenn. 609 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

Callender and John Brown proved that they were real estate agents in the city of Nashville, that they were familiar with the customs and usages of real estate agents in that city, and by this *611 usage it is the custom to … Kimberly v. Henderson, 29 Md., 513 ; Richards v. Jackson, 1 Am. R., 49.

Anderson v. Aluminum Co. of America

193 Tenn. 106 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1951

National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, 322 U. S. 111 , 64 S. Ct. 851, 861 , 88 L. Ed. 1170 . … E. (2d) 497 , and Brown Shoe Co v. Gordon, 405 Ill. 384 , 91 N. E. (2d) 381. F'or the reasons stated, the assignments of error are overruled and the judgment is affirmed. All concur.

Lambreth v. Clarke

57 Tenn. 32 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1872

Lambreth & Co. claim it by virtue of a garnishment as attaching creditors of Clarke & Brown. It is the settled law in this State, since the case of Clodfelter v. … Frank Lambreth, the agent, says that “ Rogers told me he had an order on the Railroad Company made to him by Brown, of the firm of Clarke & Brown. He did' not see the order.

Independent Order of Foresters v. Cunningham

127 Tenn. 521 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1912

The other defense was that the complainant was claiming through a quitclaim deed from Brown to Crumley, and inasmuch as Brown had conveyed the lot ■in controversy to the .defendant, by the unrecorded deed referred to, there … Soc. (3d Ed.), 148; Brown v. Supreme Ct., etc., 176 N. Y., 132 , 68 N. E., 145 .”

Lambreth v. Clarke

57 Tenn. 32 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1872

Lambreth & Co. claim it by virtue of a garnishment as attaching creditors of Clarke & Brown. It is the settled law in this State, since the case of Clodfelter v. … Frank Lambreth, the agent, says that “ Rogers told me he had an order on the Railroad Company made to him by Brown, of the firm of Clarke & Brown. He did' not see the order.

State v. Hodges

695 S.W.2d 171 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1985

After discussing the United States Supreme Court’s application of the balancing test to the facts in Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961), Sherbert v. … In Braunfeld v. Brown, supra, the religious practice involved was the Jewish sabbath, in Sherbert v. Verner, supra, it was the sabbath of Seventh Day Adventists, and in Wisconsin v.

Hyder v. Morgan

176 Tenn. 617 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1940

Brown v. Polk County, 165 Tenn., 196 , 54 S. W. (2d), 714, 716 . … As ruled by this court in Morton v. Hancock County, 161 Tenn., 324 , 30 S.

City of Memphis v. Sherwood Building Corporation

343 S.W.2d 869 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1961

Farnsworth, Burch, Porter, Johnson & Brown, Memphis, for respondents. PER CURIAM. … And, if, upon an examination of the evidence before the Board, the Courts find that "there is any material evidence to sustain the board's finding, its action should be affirmed". Putnam County Beer Board v.

Brooks v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee

145 S.W.3d 519 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 20, 2004

See Mooney v. Sneed, 30 S.W.3d 304, 306 (Tenn.2000). … P. 56.04; Penley v. Honda Motor Co., 31 S.W.3d 181, 183 (Tenn.2000); Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tenn.1993).

Mount v. Mount

46 Tenn. App. 30 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1959

See Chenault v. Chenault, 37 Tenn. 248 ; Boggers v. Boggers, 65 Tenn. 299, 300 ; Jarnigan v. Jarnigan, 80 Tenn. 292 ; Howell v. Thompson, 95 Tenn. 396 , 32 S. W. 309 ; and Edwards v. Edwards, 8 Tenn. Civ. A. 482. … Brown v. Brown, 156 Tenn. 619 , 4 S. W. (2d) 345 ; Buchholtz v. Buchholtz, 175 Tenn. 87 , 132 S.

Fletcher Whaley Long v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee

435 S.W.3d 174 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 4, 2014

S TANDARD OF R EVIEW The Supreme Court of Tennessee is the source of authority of the Board of Professional Responsibility and all its functions. Brown v. … See, e.g., Moncier v.

State ex rel. Bobo v. County of Moore

207 Tenn. 622 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1960

Boles v. … Brown v.

State ex rel. College of Bishops of M. E. Church v. Board of Trust of Vanderbilt University

129 Tenn. 279 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1913

Brown, the Hon. E. H. East, and the Rev. D. C. Kelley, D. … The authorities upon which the majority rest their decision on this subject are State v. Yardley, 95 Tenn., 516 , 32 S. W., 481 , 34 L. R. A. 656, State v. Brown, 103 Tenn., 450 , 53 S. W., 727 , Furnace Company v.

Thomas Fleming Mabry v. Board of Professional Responsibility Of The Supreme Court Of Tennessee

458 S.W.3d 900 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 30, 2014

The Supreme Court of Tennessee is the source of authority of the Board of Professional Responsibility and all its functions. Brown v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility, 29 S.W.3d 445, 449 (Tenn. 2000). … See Hanzelik v.

Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County v. Tennessee State Board of Equalization

817 S.W.2d 953 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1991

See Vanderbilt v. Ferguson, 554 S.W.2d 128 (Tenn.App.1976); Shared Hospital Services Corporation v. Ferguson, 673 S.W.2d 135 (Tenn.1974); George Peabody College for Teachers v. … In Cumberland University v.

Book Agents of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South v. State Board of Equalization

513 S.W.2d 514 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1974

Church, South v. Hinton, 92 Tenn. 188 , 21 S.W. 321 (1893). Baptist Sunday School Board is a religious institution. Sunday School Board v. Evans, 192 Tenn. 495 , 241 S.W.2d 543 (1951); Nashville v. … The purposes of Book Agents and the Baptist Sunday School Board were set out in M. E. Church, South v. Hinton, supra, and Nashville v. State Board of Equalization, 210 Tenn. 587 , 360 S.W.2d 458 (1962), respectively.

Edwards v. Allen

216 S.W.3d 278 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 2, 2007

Cherokee Country Club, Inc. v. City of Knoxville, 152 S.W.3d 466, 471 (Tenn. 2004); State ex rel. Browning-Ferris Indus. of Tenn., Inc. v. Bd. of Comm’rs of Knox County, Tenn., 806 S.W.2d 181, 187 (Tenn. Ct. … Browning-Ferris Indus., 806 S.W.2d at 188 (finding amendments not submitted to planning commission are “null and void and of no effect”); Brumley v. Town of Greeneville, 274 S.W.2d 12, 15 (Tenn. Ct.

Keaton v. State

212 Tenn. 690 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1963

City of Nashville v. Browning, 192 Tenn. 597 , 241 S.W.2d 583 . As hereafter shown in this *693 opinion it will not be necessary for ns to pass upon this contention of petitioner. … In the very similar case of Dorrell v.