Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstenn

6,256 results

1.55s

  • State Ex Rel. Thompson v. Marion County Board of Education

    202 Tenn. 29 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 3, 1957

    Relator refers to a Mississippi case of McLeod v. State of Mississippi ex rel. Miles, 154 Miss. 468 , 122 So. 737 , 63 A.L.R. 1161 . … The extreme to which a Court will go sometimes to carry out the wholesome policy of not interfering with the acts of Boards of Education, unless clearly arbitrary and unreasonable, is reflected in the case of Pugsley v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Blount County Board of Education v. City of Maryville, Tennessee

    574 S.W.3d 849 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 8, 2019

    Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 250 (Tenn. 2015) (citing Bain v. Wells, 936 S.W.2d 618, 622 (Tenn. 1997)). … Beard v. Branson, 528 S.W.3d 487, 494-95 (Tenn. 2017) (quoting Kiser v. Wolfe, 353 S.W.3d 741, 745 (Tenn. 2011)); Circle C Constr., LLC v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Davidson County Board of Education v. First American National Bank

    202 Tenn. 9 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1957

    Prior to the taking of this property by the Board of Education for school purposes the land consisted of 52.5 acres. … V. R. Co. v. Cleary, 125 Pa. 442 , 17 A. 468, 470 , as follows: “The jury are to value the tract of land and that only.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Levy v. State Board of Examiners for Speech Pathology & Audiology

    553 S.W.2d 909 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1977

    State Board of Medical Examiners v. Gandy, 248 S.C. 300 , 149 S.E.2d 644, 646 (1966). In Allied Investment Co. v. … Banks v. City of Mason, 541 S.W.2d 143 (Tenn.1976); City of Memphis v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Hoover Motor Exp. Co. v. Railroad & Public Utilities Commission

    193 Tenn. 284 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1951

    It only prescribes procedure. ” McKee v. Board of Elections, 173 Tenn. 269, 274 , 117 S. W. (2d) 752, 754 ; Anderson v. Memphis, 167 Tenn. 648 , 72 S. W. (2d) 1059 ; Savage Co. v. Knoxville, *288 167 Tenn. 642 , 72 S. … Ry. v. Browning, supra. Compare McCord v. N., C. & St. L. Ry., supra, 187 Tenn. at pages 284-285, 213 S. W. (2d) 196 ; Dunlap v. Dixie Greyhound Lines, 178 Tenn. 532, 535 , 160 S. W. (2d) 413 . Writ denied.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Clement M'daniel v. Montgomery Bell

    4 Tenn. 257 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1817

    with Brown, by which he purchased the whole of the interest of Brown, in said furnace and partnership concern, together with a considerable quantity of other property which belonged exclusively to Brown; and by said article … Brown ought, in law, equity, and good conscience, to perform them.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Short v. State Licensing Board for the Healing Arts

    193 Tenn. 389 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1952

    out of this Act by the State Licensing Board for the Healing Arts. # * •» J ? … The argument that the defendant is being deprived of his “property right”, he claiming the right to practice “naturopathy” is fully answered by this Court’s opinion in Estep v. State, 183 Tenn. 325 , 192 S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lassater v. Garrett

    63 Tenn. 368 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

    In the case of Kirkman v. … In Clark v. White, 2 Swan, 540 , language is used similar’ to that ’quoted from the case of Vaughn v. Law , but the relief was refused. In’ the case of Wall & Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McDaniel v. Bell

    4 Tenn. 258 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1817

    -with Brown, by which he purchased the whole of the interest of Brown in said furnace and partnership concern, together with a considerable quantity of other property, which belonged exclusively to Brown; and by said article … See Barker v. Butler, 3 Hay. 243 ; King’s Digest, 3575, 5216 et seq.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hudson v. Conway

    77 Tenn. 410 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1882

    The principle settled by this court, Bledsoe et al v. … See foot-note in the case of Perkins v. McDonald, 3 Baxt., page 343.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • General American Transportation Corp. v. Tennessee State Board of Equalization

    536 S.W.2d 212 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1976

    In the recent case of Apache County v. … Smith v. Cahoon, 283 U.S. 553 , 51 S.Ct. 582 , 75 L.Ed. 1264 (1931); Frost v. Railroad Comm’n, 271 U.S. 583 , 46 S.Ct. 605 , 70 L.Ed. 1101 (1926); Mich. Pub. Utilities Comm’n v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Joseph Brennan v. Board of Parole For The State of Tennessee

    512 S.W.3d 871 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 10, 2017

    The reviewing court does not inquire into the intrinsic correctness of the Board’s decision, reweigh the evidence, or substitute its judgment for that of the Board. State v. … Dec. 18, 2013) (holding that the Board did not act arbitrarily or illegally in setting parole hearing six years from the last hearing); Hendricks v. Tenn. Bd. of Prob. & Parole, No.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Ted F. Walker v. The Board of Professional

    Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 20, 2001

    In Douglas v. … Ct. 2084 (reversing the Florida Board of Accountancy’s reprimand of an attorney who truthfully advertised that she was a CPA and a Certified Financial Planner); Peel v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shelby County Board of Commissioners v. Shelby County Quarterly Court

    216 Tenn. 470 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1965

    No board, commission or group, functioning as such, was involved. In the case of Washington County Election Commission v. … Brown v. Polk County, 165 Tenn. 196 , 54 S.W.2d 714 (1932). In the case of State ex rel. Maynard v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Board of Ed. of Memphis City Schools v. Shelby County

    339 S.W.2d 569 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1960

    339 S.W.2d 569 (1960) BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the MEMPHIS CITY SCHOOLS v. SHELBY COUNTY, Tennessee, et al. CITY OF MEMPHIS v. SHELBY COUNTY, Tennessee, et al. Supreme Court of Tennessee. June 6, 1960. … Browning, 192 Tenn. 597 , 241 S.W.2d 583 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Tennessee State Board of Equalization

    969 S.W.2d 911 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1998

    For example, in Nashville Ry. & Light Co. v. … See e.g., Combustion Engineering, Inc. v. Jackson, 705 S.W.2d 655 (Tenn.1986), Genesco, Inc. v. Woods, 578 S.W.2d 639 (Tenn.1979), State v. Bone, 185 Tenn. 78 , 203 S.W.2d 362 (1947), Sherrill v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • The Tennessean v. Electric Power Board of Nashville

    Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1998

    In Seaton v. Johnson, 898 S.W.2d 232 (Tenn. … P olice P rac., Etc. v . Cra ig, 153 Cal. Rptr. 173, 178 (Cal. Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tennessee Real Estate Commission v. Potts

    221 Tenn. 585 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 24, 1968

    Chamberlain v. State ex rel. Brown (1965) 215 Tenn. 565 , 387 S.W.2d 816 . The creation, *588 composition, duties and powers of the Board ar¿;set forth in Chapter 13 of Title 62 of Tennessee Code Annotated. … Delta Loan & Finance Co. of Tenn., Inc. v. Long, supra; Chamberlain v. Brown, supra. The official residence or situs of the Real Estate Commission is fixed in Davidson County.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Board of Educational Com'rs v. O'Brien

    170 Tenn. 435 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1936

    To the same effect, see State ex rel. v. Houston, 40 La. Ann. 393 , 4 So., 50 , 8 Am. St. Rep., 532 ; State ex rel. v. Associated Press, 159 Mo., 410 , 60 S. W., 91 , 51 L. R. A., 151, 81 Am. St. … Rep., 368 ; State ex rel. v. District Board, 162 Wis., 482 , 156 N. W., 477 , L. R. A., 1916D, 399, Ann. Cas., 1918C, 584.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • George Peabody College for Teachers v. State Board of Equalization

    219 Tenn. 123 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1966

    An excellent review of the legislative acts preceding what is now T.C.A. see. 67-502(2) is set forth in City of Nashville v. State Board of Equalization, supra. … It is further pointed out that the opinion in City of Nashville v. State Board of Equali *129 zation, supra, in nowise dilutes the rule of liberal interpretation.

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.