Case law

McClellan v. Board of Regents of the State University

921 S.W.2d 684 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1996

Pace v. Garbage Disposal of Wash. Co., 54 Tenn.App. 263 , 390 S.W.2d 461, 463 (1965). The State Board of Regents Policy in applicable part states: II. … Recently we noted in Campbell v.

Wisener v. Maupin

61 Tenn. 342 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1872

In the case of Rainwater v. … In cases of Cox v.

Hubert Patty v. Board of Professional Responsibility

Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 1, 2002

BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Blount County No. 01-096 Frank V. Williams, III, Sitting by Designation No. … Murphy v. Board of Professional Responsibility, 924 S.W.2d 643 (Tenn. 1996).

Lipes v. State

83 Tenn. 125 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1885

Loverin v. Tansil

118 Tenn. 717 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1907

They are Austin v. State, 101 Tenn., 563 , 48 S. W., 305 , 50 L. R. A., 478, 70 Am. St. Rep., 703 ; Kimmell v. State, 104 Tenn., 184 , 56 S. W., 854 ; Croy v. Obion County, 104 Tenn., 525 , 58 S. W., 235 , 51 L. R. … Rep., 931 ; Austin v. Tenn., 179 U. S., 343 , 21 *723 Sap. Ct., 132, 45 L. Ed., 224 ; Cook v. Marshall County, 196, U. S., 261, 25 Sup. Ct., 233, 49 L. Ed., 471 ; and May v. New Orleans, 178 U. S., 496 , 20 Sup.

Reginald Dion Hughes v. Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole

514 S.W.3d 707 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 23, 2017

Petitioner first became eligible for parole on June 20, 2003, but the Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole denied parole after a hearing. Hughes v. Tenn. Bd. of Parole, No. … He took advantage of the *724 board’s appellate process, and his appeal was denied by letter because the board stated, “Upon reviewing the board file and audio recording of the hearing, your allegations of misconduct and

Mulheim v. Knox Co. Board of Education

Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1999

Shadrick v. Coker, 963 S.W.2d 726, 731 (Tenn. 1998) (citing Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208, 210-11 (Tenn. 1993)). … See generally Finister v. Humbolt General Hosp., 970 S.W.2d 435, 439 (Tenn. 1998) (holding that a hospital is exempt as a subsidiary of an exempt hospital district); Presley v.

State Board of Examiners for Architects & Engineers v. Rodgers

167 Tenn. 374 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1934

The test of this issue is stated in Motlow v. State, 125 Tenn., 547, 590 , 145 S, W., 177, 188, L. R, A., 1918F, 177, quoted in Campbell v. McIntyre, 165 Tenn., 47 , 52 S. … The power of the Legislature to regulate the practice of architecture, in the interest of the public safety was conceded by counsel and sustained by this court in State Board of Examiners, etc., v.

State Board of Regents of the University v. Gray

561 S.W.2d 140 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1978

The State Board of Regents, which governs the university, is such an agency. … S. v. Evans, 333 U.S. 483 , 68 S.Ct. 634 , 92 L.Ed. 823 (1948); Mossew v. U. S., 2 Cir., 266 F. 18 , 11 A.L.R. 1261 (1920); State v.

Michael H. Sneed v. Board of Professional Responsibility

Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 3, 2001

SNEED v. BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 98-3543-II Tom E. Gray, Chancellor by Interchange No. … Attached to and filed with the petition is a supporting affidavit shich states, interalia, that “[d]isciplinary counsel [has advised] that the Board has no objection to an additional thirty days to have pending matters resolved

Robertson v. Tennessee Board of Social Worker Certification & Licensure

227 S.W.3d 7 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 27, 2007

Indus. v. Tenn. Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 599 S.W.2d 536, 540 (Tenn.1980); Metro. Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson County v. Shacklett, 554 S.W.2d 601 , 604 (Tenn.1977); Gluck v. Civil Serv. … I, § 8,” 5 Martin v.

Loring E. Justice v. Board of Professional Responsibility

Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 12, 2024

Brown of her recommendation [Plaintiff] undergo individual psychotherapy to achieve [the minor child’s] best interests. … v.

United Artists Corp. v. Board of Censors of Memphis

189 Tenn. 397 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1949

General Oil Co. v. Crain, 209 U. S. 211 , 28 S. Ct. 475 , 52 L. Ed. 754 ; Browning v. City of Waycross, 233 U. S. 16 , 34 S. Ct. 578 , 58 L. Ed. 828 ; Fox Film Corporation v. Trumbull, D. C., 7 P. 2d 715 , 722. … The Court cites as authority for the foregoing well considered statement : General Oil Co. v. Crain; Fox Film Corp. v. Trumbull; and Browning v. City of Waycross, supra, and other Federal decisions.

Anderson v. City of Memphis

167 Tenn. 648 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1934

Tomlinson v. Board of Equalization, 88 Tenn., 1 , 12 S. W., 414 , 6 L. R. A., 207; Staples v. Brown, 113 Tenn., 639 , 85 S. W., 254 ; Carriger v. Mayor, etc., of Morristown, 148 Tenn., 585 , 256 S. … See Staples v. Brown, 113 Tenn., 639 , 85 S. W., 254 ; Tennessee Central Railroad Co. v. Campbell, *652 109 Tenn., 645 , 75 S. W., 1012 ; Conners v. City of Knoxville, 136 Tenn., 428 , 189 S.

West v. Industrial Development Board of City of Nashville

206 Tenn. 154 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1960

See Foster v. Roberts, 142 Tenn. 350 , 219 S.W. 729 , 9 A.L.R. 431 . The question appearing in McConnell v. … As held in Holly v. City of Elizabethton, supra, the Industrial Development Board of Nashville is an instrumentality or agency of the City of Nashville.

Daniel Sungkook Chong v. Tennessee Board of Law Examiners

481 S.W.3d 609 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 4, 2015

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE DANIEL SUNGKOOK CHONG v. … Frazier v.

Fort Sanders Presbyterian Hospital v. Health & Educational Facilities Board

224 Tenn. 240 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1970

See Holly v. City of Elizabethton, et al. (1951) 193 Tenn. 46 , 241 S.W.2d 1001 ; West v. Industrial Development Board of City of Nashville, et al., supra. … This Court has held, in West v.

Wyckoff v. Board of Administration of the Retirement System

208 Tenn. 604 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1961

This is a petition for writ of certiorari against the Pension Board of the City of Memphis stating that the action of the Pension Board in denying Mrs. … Collins v. City of Knoxville, 180 Tenn. 483 , 176 S.W.2d 808 . This rule cannot be applied where the language is certain and unambiguous.

Federal Express Corp. v. Tennessee State Board of Equalization

717 S.W.2d 873 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 6, 1986

General American Transportation Corporation v. Tennessee State Board of Equalization, 536 S.W.2d 212 (Tenn.1976). … In American Railway Express Co. v.

Hughes v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF CITY OF CHATTANOOGA

319 S.W.2d 481 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1958

HUGHES v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF CITY OF CHATTANOOGA, Tennessee, et al. Supreme Court of Tennessee. December 12, 1958. *482 McClure & Moore, and Don Moore, Jr., Chattanooga, for appellant. Ellis K. … Reetz v. [People of State of] Michigan, 188 U.S. 505 , 23 S.Ct. 390 , 47 L.Ed. 563 ."