Case law

Bowden v. Memphis Board of Education

29 S.W.3d 462 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 13, 2000

Bain v. Wells, 936 S.W.2d 618, 622 (Tenn.1997). … Id. at 679 ; see also Riggs v. Burson, 941 S.W.2d 44, 54 (Tenn.1997). We have addressed the issue in this case on prior occasions. In Sanders v.

Board of Com'rs v. Obion County

188 Tenn. 666 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1949

The bill in this cause was filed in the name of the Board of Commissioners of Union City and of the Board of Education of Union City, for the use and benefit of some, not all, of the elementary and high school teachers of … Kennedy & Munford v. Montgomery County, 98 Tenn. 165, 179 , 38 S. W. 1075 , 1079. To tbe same effect are State ex rel. v. Pollard, 124 Tenn. 127, 135 , 136 S. W. 427 ; Robbins v. Phillips, 175 Tenn. 568, 574 , 136 S.

Lannom v. Board of Mayor

155 Tenn. 25 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1927

consideration, the deed containing a clause that the property should be used by the vendees for school purposes, and that if it should cease to be used for school purposes, the title should revert to and reinvest in the Board … Donaldson v. Insurance Co., 95 Tenn., 270, 283-284 .

Jones v. Sullivan County Beer Board

200 Tenn. 301 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1956

Anderson v. Putnam County Beer Board, 184 Tenn. 623 , 201 S.W. 2d 994 . … This question was directly raised in Anderson v.

Young v. Warren County Beer Board

195 Tenn. 211 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1953

Justice Bailor) that the order of the trial court was not a final order and affirmed the action of the court in remanding the case to the Beer Board. Bragg v. Boyd (Young v. Boyd), 193 Tenn. 507 , 246 S. W. (2d) 575 . … County Beer Boards have no legal authority to prescribe any further restrictions, limitations or conditions in 'the granting or revocation of permits. Wright v. State, 171 Tenn. 628 , 106 S. W. (2d) 866 ; Perry v.

Henry v. Blount County Beer Board

617 S.W.2d 888 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1981

Rutherford County Beer Board v. Adams, 571 S.W.2d 830 ; City of Murfreesboro v. Davis, 569 S.W.2d 805 (Tenn.1978); Seay v. Knox County Quarterly Court, 541 S.W.2d 946 (Tenn.1976); Serv. U. Mart, Inc. v. … City of Murfreesboro v. Davis, 569 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tenn.1978).

Anderson v. Putnam County Beer Board

184 Tenn. 623 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 3, 1947

Swann] v. Burchfield, 80 Tenn. 30, 33 ; Blackburn v. Vick, 49 Tenn. 377, 382 .” State ex rel. Thurman v. Scott, 184 Tenn. 76 , 195 S. W. (2d) 617, 618 . … For a full discussion of tbe application of tbe two writs of certiorari in proceeding’s to review action of County Beer Board see Putnam County Beer Board v. Speck, 184 Tenn. 616 , 201 S. W. (2d) 991 .

Electric Power Board v. Thoni

184 Tenn. 459 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 3, 1947

The insistence of the Electric Power Board is that the circuit judge acted illegally and beyond his jurisdiction and, therefore, the relief sought lies only through writ of certiorari. In City of Nashville v. … Donovan v. Welch, 11 N. D. 113 , 90 N. W. 262 ; Tucker Mfg. Co. v. Fairbanks, 98 Mass. 101 . It was held in Nashville v.

Patty v. Board of Professional Responsibility

90 S.W.3d 641 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 1, 2002

This is a direct appeal in a Board of Professional Responsibility case. … Murphy v. Board of Professional Responsibility, 924 S.W.2d 643 (Tenn.1996).

Brown for Lawson's Use v. Geo. Kite

2 Tenn. 233 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 6, 1814

John Brown and Others v. Jacob Gyre

2 Tenn. 189 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1812

Brown and Charles Robison with Jacob Brown and John Parker their securities, for the stay of said execution twelve months, that after that time had elapsed, Gyre in the county court, moved for and obtained judgment on the … Brown, Charles Robison Jacob Brown and Parker; that Jacob Brown alone, moved for and obtained an appeal to the circuit court ; that court entered up judgment, not only against Jacob Brown, but against the other three, who

Brown and Others v. M'can and Others

6 Tenn. 123 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1818

, a grant issued to him, the said John Brown, in the year 1808, covering the land so entered. … The bill further states that the defendants, or those tinder whom they claim, entered the same land that was covered by said Brown's entry; but by entry subsequent to Brown's entry, and of a younger date.

Harvey v. Rhea County Beer Board

563 S.W.2d 790 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1978

Coffman v. Hammer, Tenn., 548 S.W.2d 310 (1977); Lones v. Blount County Beer Board, Tenn., 538 S.W.2d 386 (Tenn.1976); T.C.A., § 57-209. … Lones v. Blount County Beer Board, supra at 390.

Thomas v. State Board of Equalization

940 S.W.2d 563 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1997

Co. v. Hake, 183 Tenn. 615, 194 S.W.2d 468 (1946). … Simmons v.

Tucker v. Carter County Beer Board

191 Tenn. 210 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1950

Such illegal use justified the Board in revoking it. … While it is very unsatisfactory, there is about it sufficient of substance to prevent any disturbance by the Court of the Board’s finding and order upon that point. Putnam County Beer Board v.

American Heritage Apartments, Inc. v. The Hamilton County Water and Wastewater Treatment Authority, Hamilton County, Tenenssee

494 S.W.3d 31 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 8, 2016

The trial court noted that none of the parties‘ pending motions ―address an issue which the Court believes must be initially resolved,‖ namely, the applicability of Brown v. … See Sykes v. Chattanooga Hous.

Rutherford County Beer Board v. Adams

571 S.W.2d 830 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1978

Serv-U-Mart, Inc. v. Sullivan County, Tenn., 527 S.W.2d 121 (1975); Seay v. Knox County Quarterly Court, Tenn., 541 S.W.2d 946 (1976); City of Murfreesboro v. Davis, Tenn., 569 S.W.2d 805 (1978). … Gibson v. Ferguson, Tenn., 562 S.W.2d 188, 189 (1976); Adams v. Monroe County Quarterly Court, 214 Tenn. 270 , 379 S.W.2d 769, 771 (1964); Cantrell v. DeKalb County Beer Board, 213 Tenn. 568 , 376 S.W.2d 480 (1964).

Monceret v. Board of Professional Responsibility

29 S.W.3d 455 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 27, 2000

THOMAS MONCERET v. THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 133879-3 Irvin H. … United States v. Lopez, 4 F.3d 1455 (9th Cir. 1993); People v.

Nevin v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court

271 S.W.3d 648 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 27, 2008

Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility, 259 S.W.3d 631, 640 (Tenn.2008); Brown v. Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility, 29 S.W.3d 445, 449 (Tenn.2000). … The Board argues that the six-month suspension was supported by the evidence in this case and is consistent with similar cases. The Board cites Milligan v.

Katella Brown Bible v. State

222 Tenn. 361 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1968

Brown by deed of J. N. Brown,” cannot negate this plain and clear grant. So to hold would be to allow that which is ambiguous to prevail over that which is certain; which we cannot allow. Hicks v. … Bennett v. Langham, 214 Tenn. 674 , 383 S.W.2d 16 ; Roberts v. Hale, 216 Tenn. 578 , 393 S.W.2d 155 ; Teague v. Sowder, 121 Tenn. 132 , 114 S.W. 484 .