Case law

Sullivan's Lessee v. Brown

1 Tenn. 6 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1799

Brown & Herndon v. Williams

23 Tenn. 22 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1843

McGavock v. Brown & Williams

23 Tenn. 251 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1843

Dorris, who stated that he was called upon by Brown & Williams to assist in settling their partnership accounts, and that while engaged in making this settlement a conversation arose between them as to the debt Brown owed … He says, that in a conversation between Brown and Williams in his presence, Williams said “that Brown’s old debt would have to be deducted from the amount due them from McGavock for the work,” and that Brown knew that it

Brown & Herndon v. Williams

23 Tenn. 22 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1843

Miller v. Brown & Forsyth

79 Tenn. 155 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1883

subject to the satisfaction of the debt by execution, for the obvious reason that the court would do at once what might be done circuitously by a sale of the land by virtue of the execution as soon as it was redeemed: Cooley v. … It has been so held in the analogous case of a vendor’s, lien: Bentley v. Jordan, 3 Lea, 353 , 358. The homestead is not exempt' from the debt. Affirm the decree with costs, and remand.'

Brown & Herndon v. Williams

23 Tenn. 22 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1843

Brown v. Crump's adm'r

32 Tenn. 531 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1852

Murphy Truck Lines v. Brown

203 Tenn. 414 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1958

Thus in Grant v. Louisville & N. … Lambert Bros. v. Larkins, supra.

Brown Shoe Co. v. Pipes

581 S.W.2d 140 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 8, 1979

Simpson v. Satterfield, Tenn., 564 S.W.2d 953 (1978); Gluck Bros. Inc. v. Coffey, 222 Tenn. 6 , 431 S.W.2d 756 (1968). Mrs. … The costs of the appeal are taxed against Brown Shoe Company. HENRY, C. J., and PONES, BROCK and HARBISON, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. v. Brown

159 Tenn. 591 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1929

Reams v. Board of Mayor & Aldermen, 155 Tenn., 222 . … And in Reams v.

Brown v. Crystal Ice Co.

121 Tenn. 64 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1908

On the first of June, 1908, Bawdry Brown filed a bill against the defendant company, in which he alleged, in substance, that he was the owner of certain shares of stock in the defendant corporation, and that he had made application

Consolidation Coal Co. v. Brown

225 Tenn. 572 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1971

Defendant relies on our earlier case of Minton v. Leonard (1967) 219 Tenn. 642 , 412 S.W.2d 886 . In Minton v. … However, in the case of Charnes v.

Brown Heirs v. Cannon County

165 Tenn. 554 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1933

The State Highway Department constructed a state highway through lands belonging to Brown Heirs, in Cannon County, in 1928', and thereafter Brown Heirs instituted this action against Cannon County, by petition asking for … The opinion of the Court of Appeals in Shelby County v. Adams, was filed prior to the decision of this Court in Baker v. Donegan, 164 Tenn., 625 , 47 S. W. (2d), 1095 .

Brown v. City of Chattanooga

180 Tenn. 284 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1943

Belle Brown, colored, was a pedestrian,” etc. The notice itself .failed to state the year irl which the accident happened. … Bejach v. Colby, 141 Tenn., 686 , 214 S. W., 869 .

Brown v. Crystal Ice Co.

122 Tenn. 239 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1909

W., 299 ; State v. Alexander, 115 Tenn., 156 , 90 S. W., 20 ; State v. Board of Inspectors, 114 Tenn., 516 , 86 S. W., 319 ; State v. Williams, 110 Tenn., 549 , 75 S. W., 948 , 64 L. R. A., 418; State v. … Co. v. Wisdom, 5 Heisk., 125, 155, 157 ; Rainey v. Aydelette, 4 Heisk., 122 ; Jonesboro, Fall Branch & Blair’s Gap Turnpike Co. v. Brown, 8 Baxt., 490 , 35 Am. Rep., 713 ; State v.

Brown v. Tennessee Title Loans, Inc.

328 S.W.3d 850 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 29, 2010

See Brown v. Tenn. -2- Title Loans, Inc., 216 S.W.3d 780, 787 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006) (citing Taylor v. … See Brown v. Tenn. Title Loans, Inc., No. E2008-01758-COA-R9-CV, 2009 WL 2213487, at *6 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 24, 2009).

Brown v. Consolidation Coal Co.

224 Tenn. 144 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1970

were called at the hearing, Brown and his physician, Dr. … In view of this, and in view of our opinion in Adams v.

Moore Coal Co. v. Brown

166 Tenn. 516 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1933

Co. v. Stockton, 143 Tenn., 201 , 226 S. W., 187 , 22 A. L. R., 1467; Acme Box Co. v. Gregory, 119 Tenn., 537 , 105 S. W., 350 , 351; Griffin & Son v. Parker, 129 Tenn., 446 , 164 S. W., 1142 , L. R. … In Acme Box Company v.

State v. Callicutt

69 Tenn. 714 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1878

In the case of the State v. Irvine, 3 Heis., 155, we held, when two misdemeanors of the same character are created by the same statute, punishable in the same manner, they may be joined in the same count. … The cases of Aymette v. State, 2 Hum., 155 , opinion by Judge Greene, and of Page v.

State v. Howard Brown

Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 24, 2000

.”); Gudinas v. … Trial counsel, not the trial court, essentially deprived Brown of the opportunity to present an alternative explanation to the jury.