Case law

Hutchison v. Board

194 Tenn. 223 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1952

Templeton v. Stong, 182 Tenn. [591], 594, [ 188 S. W. (2d) 560 ], citing N[ashville] C. & St. L. R. v. Bell, 162 Tenn. 661 [ 39 S. W. (2d) 1026 ], Lockett v. Thomas, 179 Tenn. 240 [ 165 S. W. (2d) 375 ]; McCord v. … In Carver v. Maxwell, 110 Tenn. 75 , 71 S.

Brown Shoe Company v. Reed

209 Tenn. 106 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1961

Such cases as Marshall Construction Co. v. Russell, 163 Tenn. 410 , 43 S.W.2d 208 ; McBrayer v. Dixie Mercerising Co., 176 Tenn. 560 , 144 S.W.2d 764 , and Edwards v. … Norton v. Standard Coosa-Thatcher Co., 203 Tenn. 649 , 315 S.W.2d 245 .

Knoxville Traction Co. v. Brown

115 Tenn. 323 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1905

Brown, wife of J. C. Brown. The *326 suit is brought in the name of the husband and wife, and is based upon an injury done to the wife. … Bethel v. Street Ry. Co., 8 O. C. D., 310. In the case of Newark v.

Brown v. Electric Railway Co.

101 Tenn. 252 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1898

This is an. action for personal injuries, resulting in the death of plaintiff’s husband, Andrew Brown. … Olsen v. McMullen, 34 Minn., 95 ; Pederson v. Rashford, 41 Minn., 290 ; Swanson v. Railroad, 70 N. W. Rep., 976 ; Loughlin v. State, 105 N. Y., 159 ; Del Seynore v. Hallihan, 24 N. E. Rep., 748; Evans v.

Brown v. Consolidation Coal Company

518 S.W.2d 234 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1974

Brown, filed a complaint on April 29, 1971, seeking workmen’s compensation benefits for the occupational disease known as coal worker’s pneumonocosis. … We are aware that this decision is contrary to the result reached in College Coal Mining Company v. Smith, 160 Tenn. 93 , 21 S.W.2d 1038 (1929), and Shockley v.

Randolph v. Randolph

937 S.W.2d 815 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1996

Gillock v. Board of Professional Responsibility, 656 S.W.2d 365, 367 (Tenn.1983). … See also Newman v. Newman, 653 P.2d 728, 732 (Colo.1982); Burtoff v. Burtoff, 418 A.2d 1085, 1089 (D.C.App.1980); Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, 143 So.2d 17, 21 (Fla.1962); Frey v.

Harbour v. Brown for Ulrich

732 S.W.2d 598 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1987

Van Donselaar v. VanDonselaar, 249 Iowa 504 , 87 N.W.2d 311 (1958); Lee v. Rhodes, 227 N.C. 240 , 41 S.E.2d 747 (1947); Norton Shores v. Carr, 59 Mich.App. 561 , 229 N.W.2d 848 (1975). Cf. Kittrelle v. … In making reference to the general rule in Burnaman v.

Sheila Brown v. Rico Roland

357 S.W.3d 614 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 18, 2012

Brown v. Roland, No. M2009-01885-COA-R3-CV, 2010 WL 3732169 (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 23, 2010). The plaintiff filed a Tenn. R. App. … Brown v. Roland, No. M2009-01885-COA-R3-CV, 2010 WL 3732169, at *6 (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 23, 2010). Ms. Brown retained a new lawyer and filed a Tenn. R. App.

City of Knoxville v. Brown

195 Tenn. 501 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1953

Provided no name plate exceeding one (1) square foot in area, nor bulletin boards, nor signs exceeding twelve (12) square feet in area appertaining to the lease, hire or sale of .a building or premises, nor advertising sign … Club, Inc., v. Burkhalter, 193 Tenn. 79 , 241 S. W. (2d) 921 . The construction though of such ordinances is governed by the general rules applicable to the construction of other statutes and ordinances. 62 C. J.

Tennessee Central Railroad v. Brown

125 Tenn. 351 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1911

Brown, as administrator of A. 0. … Noyes v. Parker, 64 Vt., 379 , 24 Atl., 12 ; People v. Dick, 37 Cal., 277 ; State v. Wing, 32 Me., 581;. Vandever v. Garshwiler, 63 Ind., 186 ; State v. Bryan, 89 N. C., 531 . . . .

Vaughn & Brown v. Hatfield

13 Tenn. 236 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1833

McGavock v. Brown & Williams

23 Tenn. 251 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1843

Dorris, who stated that he was called upon by Brown & Williams to assist in settling their partnership accounts, and that while engaged in making this settlement a conversation arose between them as to the debt Brown owed … He says, that in a conversation between Brown and Williams in his presence, Williams said “that Brown’s old debt would have to be deducted from the amount due them from McGavock for the work,” and that Brown knew that it

Brown & McCarver v. Pippin

59 Tenn. 657 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

Kingsport Utilities, Inc. v. Brown

201 Tenn. 393 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1955

The case of Arkansas Power Light Co. v. … Judge Felts has covered the question .of foreseeability in Ms opinion in Spivey v. St. Thomas Hospital, 31 Tenn.App. 12 , 211 S.W.2d 450 .

Brown v. Western Electric Co.

646 S.W.2d 912 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1983

Brown & McCarver v. Pippin

59 Tenn. 657 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

Brown & McCarver v. Pippin

59 Tenn. 657 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

McGavock v. Brown & Williams

23 Tenn. 251 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1843

Dorris, who stated that he was called upon by Brown & Williams to assist in settling their partnership accounts, and that while engaged in making this settlement a conversation arose between them as to the debt Brown owed … He says, that in a conversation between Brown and Williams in his presence, Williams said “that Brown’s old debt would have to be deducted from the amount due them from McGavock for the work,” and that Brown knew that it

Henniken & Palmore v. Brown

63 Tenn. 397 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

Cheney, McAlister, and Sample, the latter having been called in during the trial, in the account of Henniken & Palmore against Goodwin & Brown, wherein the said Henniken & Palmore are to deduct from their account of $1,682

Sullivan's Lessee v. Brown

1 Tenn. 6 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1799