Case law

Brown v. McLaughlin

27 Tenn. 140 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1847

defect in the bonds, is, that it does not appear from them that the judgments appealed from were . rendered in favor of James McLaughlin, the defendant in error; he therefore had no right to a judgment against the security Brown

Brown v. Collier

27 Tenn. 510 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1847

Brown v. State

13 Tenn. 367 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1833

The principal objection to it, as the court view it, is the joining in the same presentment sundry other offenders not connected in the gaming with Brown; but if these all be stricken out, the presentment will be left good … against Brown.

Brown v. Moore

14 Tenn. 272 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1834

Brown v. Moore

14 Tenn. 272 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1834

Brown v. M'Donald

16 Tenn. 158 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 15, 1835

Brown v. Dortch

59 Tenn. 740 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

Brown as ■executrix of the late Aaron V. Brown, and also as legatee and devisee under his will, together with other devisees and legatees, against W. B. … Aaron V.

Gardner v. Brown

20 Tenn. 354 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1839

Cross’s heirs were not the true owners; for the entry having been assigned, the land on the 3d day of January, 1827, was granted to Jesse Brown the lessor of the plaintiff.

Brown v. Elms

29 Tenn. 135 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1849

Brown v. Barker

29 Tenn. 346 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1849

Brown v. Barker

29 Tenn. 346 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1849

Brown v. State

8 Tenn. 871 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

The record shows the case to stand on the minutes thus: “State of Tennessee v. Milton D. Brown, Archibald Brown, John C. Perry, Chas. T. Brown — Motion. … It is argued that it does not appear from this recital, from whom the amount was due, whether from Brown, as tax collector, or not.

Robinson v. Brown

60 Tenn. 206 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1872

Brown v. Rocco

56 Tenn. 187 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1872

Brown & B. B. Waddell for $128.05. Brown & Waddell appealed to this Court. During the pendency of the cause in this court Brown died, and no one administered on his estate. … Upon application for that purpose this court ordered sci. fa. to issue against the heirs of Brown for the purpose of a revivor.

Brown v. Rocco

56 Tenn. 187 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1872

Brown & B. B. Waddell for $128.05. Brown & Waddell appealed to this Court. During the pendency of the cause in this court Brown died, and no one administered on his estate. … Upon application for that purpose this court ordered sci. fa. to issue against the heirs of Brown for the purpose of a revivor.

Brown v. Jacobi

57 Tenn. 335 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1872

Henry v. Brown

49 Tenn. 213 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1870

In the case of Brien v. … See Scott v. Fletcher, 1 Tenn. Rep., 488 , Cooper’s ed.

Brown v. Reynolds

37 Tenn. 639 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1858

Brown v. Lusk

12 Tenn. 210 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1833

That if it he considered a bill of exchange, still Brown was not entitled to notice, inasmuch as he had no funds in the Bank when he drew, nor until long after the draft became payable. … Witness afterwards saw Brown and told him that payment had been demanded and refused, when Brown said it must he arranged^ The conversation between the witness and Lusk was wholly incompetent, and ought not to have been received

Jenkins v. Brown

25 Tenn. 299 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1845

Brown, but of two slaves named John and Tom, who advanced the money to Brown to loan to Jenkins. … Brown, was money had and received 'by him for them, and to whom he was and is responsible for the payment of the same.