Case law

Brown v. Brown

3 Shan. Cas. 86 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1879

This canse of Simeon Cornick and wife v. Mary Brown et al. is referred *87 to in- this bill, and asked to be made exhibits and parts thereof. … See [Beeler v. Dunn], 3 Head, 90 , 91. In Roseborough v.

Brown v. Brown

34 Tenn. 431 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1854

. *435 This action in debt for $1167 86 was instituted in the circuit court of Davidson, by Brown & McCullough, against "Win. L. Brown, the defendant below.

Brown v. Brown

34 Tenn. 431 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1854

. *435 This action in debt for $1167 86 was instituted in the circuit court of Davidson, by Brown & McCullough, against "Win. L. Brown, the defendant below.

Brown v. Brown

79 Tenn. 698 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1883

Brown, the ward, as a set-off against the expense of his maintenance, pointing out the proof showing the service to have been worthless. … V. Deaderick, Esq., discussing clearly this point, and holding said service to be shown by the proof worthless.

Brown v. Brown

18 Tenn. 84 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1836

The bill charges that the defendant, Elizabeth Brown, got possession of the said will immediately after the death of her father, and that she and her husband, Charles V. … Brown, have suppressed or destroyed it, so that it cannot now be found. The answer of Charles V. Brown denies any knowledge of the existence of a will, or that he had any agency in its destruction.

In Re Estate of Davis

308 S.W.3d 832 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 23, 2010

Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997); Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Cent. S., 816 S.W.2d 741, 744 (Tenn. 1991). … Calaway v. Schucker, 193 S.W.3d 509 (Tenn. 2005), and Penley v.

Brown v. Brown

548 S.W.2d 660 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1977

Brown was entitled to the automobile, nevertheless, we are of opinion that the original decree had become final and that Rule 60.02 should not be extended to cover a situation such as is revealed by this record, especially … The rule came under our scrutiny in Jerkins v. McKinney, 533 S.W.2d 275 (Tenn.1976), where we pointed out that it was designed to strike a proper balance between the competing principles of finality and justice.

State v. Shelton

851 S.W.2d 134 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1993

State v. Brown, 823 S.W.2d 576, 583 (Tenn.Crim.App.1991). … In State v.

State v. Brown

311 S.W.3d 422 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 27, 2010

State v. Brown, No. W1999-00327-CCA-R3-CD, 2000 WL 1664226, at *6, 8-9 (Tenn. Crim. App. Oct. 24, 2000). … State v. Brown, No. W1999-00327-CCA-R3-CD, 2002 WL 1869418 (Tenn. Crim. App. Aug. 8, 2002), no perm. app. filed.

Biscan v. Brown

160 S.W.3d 462 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 30, 2005

Brown. … See, e.g., Turner v.

Hunter v. Brown

955 S.W.2d 49 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1997

Ed Brown, Jr. According to Hunter, Ed Brown, Jr., began sexually abusing her in July 1981—a month after her placement in the Brown home. … Gonzales v. Alman *51 Constr. Co., 857 S.W.2d 42, 44-45 (Tenn.App.1993)(citing Hill v. City of Chattanooga, 533 S.W.2d 311, 312 (Tenn.App.1975)).

State v. Brown

836 S.W.2d 530 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1992

In Poole v. … State of Tennessee v. Evajean Brown, (Tenn.Crim.App. Knoxville, Dec. 20, 1988), 1988 WL 136600 , perm. app. denied, May 8, 1989.

State v. Brown

551 S.W.2d 329 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 9, 1977

It specifically stated: “We cannot say that the evidence excludes all reasonable hypothesis save guilt on the part of Redden and Clarence Ray Brown in that ease.” The Court then cited Marie v. … In Marie v.

Agee v. Brown

1 Thompson 22 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1847

State v. Brown

1 Thompson 20 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1847

State v. Brown

29 S.W.3d 427 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 24, 2000

In Washington v. … See Teemer v.

Brown v. State

85 Tenn. 439 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1887

Notwithstanding, then, his affidavit in reference to this testimony, “it does not appear,” to use the language of this Court in Rexford v. … Many other facts and circumstances might be detailed which show the guilt of defendant, and which establish it independently of the testimony *446 .of Bill Brown, who describes the killing and Ben Brown’s participation in

Spurlock v. Brown

91 Tenn. 241 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1892

In Hayes v. … Sparks v. White, 7 Hum., 87 . In Wheeler v.

Hughes v. Brown

8 L.R.A. 480 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1890

Virginia Brown and her chil *581 dren, remainder, at death of Mrs. Brown, to her children then living and the representatives of such as are dead. … Elmendorf v. Taylor, 10 Wheat., 168 ; Smith v. Clay, 3 Brown, C. C., 640; Hovenden v. Annesley, 2 Sch. & Lef., 632; Porter's Lessee v. Cocke, Peck, 43; Shelby’s Heirs v. Shelby, Cooke, 184 ; Armstrong v.

Chamberlain v. Brown

223 Tenn. 25 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1969

See Chamberlain,, et al v. State ex rel. Brown, supra. Also in 1964, plaintiff filed an action for damages, Cause No. 3065, against the defendants, in the Circuit Court of Hamilton County. … See McNeese et al. v. Board of Education (1963), 373 U.S. 668 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 and Monroe, et al v. Pape, et al, supra.