Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,256 results
0.51s
State ex rel. Iverson v. Sheriff of Cook County
186 Tenn. 349 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 3, 1948
Munsey v. Clough, 196 U. S. 364, 373 , 25 S. Ct. 282, 284 , 49 L. Ed. 515 ; State ex rel. Lea v. Brown, supra, 169 Tenn. at page 682, 64 S. W. (2d) 841 ; Ex parte Reggel, 114 U. S. 642 , 5 S. Ct. 1148 , 29 L. … Brown v. Grosch, 177 Tenn. 619 , 152 S. W. (2d) 239 . For the reasons stated the assignments of error are dismissed and the judgment affirmed. All concur.
Cited 1 timesPublishedTennessee Supreme Court · Aug 16, 2021
Justice’s discovery requests, the Board pointed out that section 24.3 of pre-2014 Rule 9 did not authorize discovery. The Board also relied on Moncier v. … Walwyn v. Bd. of Prof’l Resp., 481 S.W.3d 151, 165 (Tenn. 2015) (quoting West v. Schofield, 460 S.W.3d 113, 120 (Tenn. 2015)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Scandlyn v. Trotter
153 Tenn. 30 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1925
No estimate was made or reported by the board of education as called for by the act. … Justice Williams in his opinion in the Turnpike Co., Case, supra, is Murray v. Board of Com., 84 N. W., 103 , 81 Minn., 359 , 51 L. R. A., 828, 83 Am. St. Rep. 379 , which is particularly in point here.
Cited 22 timesPublishedPowers v. Journeymen Bricklayers' Union No. 3
130 Tenn. 643 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1914
Jacobs v. Cohen, 183 N. Y., 207 , 75 N. E., 5 , 2 L. R. A. (N. S.), 292, 111 Am. St. Rep., 730 , 5 Ann. Cas., 280; Mills v. U. S. Printing Co., 99 App Div., 605 , 91 N. Y. Supp., 185 . … Pickett v. Walsh, supra; Brown v. Brown, 86 Tenn., 277, 279, 310 , 6 S. W., 869 , 7 S. W., 640 ; Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Rainey, 120 Tenn., 357, 384 , 113 S. W., 397 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. United Mine Workers of America v. Askew
176 Tenn. 234 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1940
On petition for certiorari the controversy was taken into the chancery court of Campbell County under the style of Block Coal and Coke Company et al. v. District 19, United Mine Workers of America et al. … chancellor at Nashville was of opinion that there was no authority under the unemployment compensation laws to order payment of the benefits pending disposition of the appeal in the case of Block Coal and Coke Company et al. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNatacha D. Hudgins v. Global Personnel Solutions, Inc.
Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 5, 2024
HUDGINS v. GLOBAL PERSONNEL SOLUTIONS INC., ET AL. Appeal from the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims No. 2017-01-0690 Thomas L. Wyatt, Judge FILED No. … Madden v. Holland Grp. ' The Appeals Board here cited another Appeals Board opinion (Braden v. Mohawk Indus., Inc., No. 2019-08-0544, 2022 WL 625820, at *7 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRicky HARRIS v. STATE of Tennessee
301 S.W.3d 141 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 14, 2010
State v. Brown, 29 S.W.3d at 433-34. As in Chambers v. Mississippi and Green v. … State v. Brown, 29 S.W.3d at 431, 434.
Overruled on other grounds by Tommy Nunley v. State of Tennessee, 552 S.W.3d 800 (2018)Cited 273 timesPublished698 S.W.2d 58 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 6, 1985
Bellar v. Baptist Hospital, Inc., 559 S.W.2d 788, 790 (Tenn.1978). … See also, in addition to the cases cited in Kauffman, Donovan v. Barnes, 274 Or. 701 , 548 P.2d 980 (1976), and Groat v. Town Board of Town of Glenville, 73 A.D.2d 426 , 426 N.Y.S.2d 339 (1980).
Cited 19 timesPublished426 S.W.3d 743 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 23, 2013
P. 13(d); Wallace v. Sullivan, 561 S.W.2d 452, 453 (Tenn. 1978) (recognizing that the Board of Review’s conclusions of law are subject to de novo review with no presumption of correctness). … Dep’t. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Wolfe v. Henegar
180 Tenn. 425 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1943
In State ex rel. v. Hardin, 163 Tenn., 471 , 43 S. … Kempson v. Moore, 167 Tenn., 170, 178 , 67 S. W. (2d), 151, 153 .
Cited 2 timesPublished27 L.R.A. 663 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1895
Brown’s subdivision. … Citing Olds v. Cummings, 31 Ill., *519 188 ; Walker v. Dement, 42 Ill., 272 ; Cramer v. Willetts, 61 Ill., 481 ; Haskell v. Brown, 65 Ill., 29 ; Temple v. Whittier, 117 Ill., 282 ; 7 N. E. Rep., 642; 44 N. W.
Cited 7 timesPublished93 Tenn. 77 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1893
The Board reserves the right to reject any and all bids. “ By order of the Board. “W. L. Clapp, President.” “Attest: John J. Shea, Secretary.” … Kot denying the right of complainant as a tax-payer to enjoin defendant from the execution of an illegal contract, if it *81 would or might result in irreparable injury (Lynn v.
Cited 4 timesPublished6 S.W.3d 251 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1999
McClellan v. Board of Regents of State University, 921 S.W.2d 684, 689 (Tenn.1996). … See State v. Brown, 188 Ariz. 358 , 936 P.2d 181 (1997); People v. Teamer, 20 Cal.App.4th 1454 , 25 Cal.Rptr.2d 296 (1994); State v. Stephens, 601 So.2d 1195 (Fla.1992); People v.
Cited 56 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Cope v. Davidson County
198 Tenn. 24 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1955
Davidson County Board of Education. … This Court very recently had the question before it in Board of Commissioners of Union City v. Obion County, 188 Tenn. 666 , 222 S. W. (2d) 7, 8 .
Cited 12 timesPublished157 Tenn. 131 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1928
Eq., 263; Whittaker v. Kilby, 106 N. Y. Supp., 511 ; Reese v. Bank, 31 Pa., 78 ; Electric Co. v. Edicon Electric Co., 200 Pa. St., 516; Jones v. Ry. Co., 67 N. H., 119; Crosby v. … Dunn v. Acme Co. (Wis.), 169 N. W., 279 ; Jones v. Morrison (Minn.), 16 N. W., 854 ; Elliott v. Baker, 194 Mass., 518 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedMcCampbell v. Fountain Head Railroad
111 Tenn. 55 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1903
In Taylor v. … And in Smith v. Clay, 3 Brown, Oh., 639, it was announced that “nothing can call forth this court into activity but conscience, good faith, and reasonable diligence.
Cited 21 timesPublishedState of Tennessee v. Glen Howard
504 S.W.3d 260 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 12, 2016
He also argues that this Court should apply our holding in State v. Brown and find that this testimony was ―critical to the defense.‖ 29 S.W.3d 427 (Tenn. 2000). … On appeal, defendant also argues that the Brown decision should apply to this issue. See Brown. 29 S.W.3d at 343.
Cited 129 timesPublishedMemphis Street Railway Co. v. Flood
122 Tenn. 56 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1908
. *63 The first case decided by this court involving this question, called to onr attention, is that of Parris v. Brown, 5 Yerg., 267 . … While the warrant was held to state a cause of action in that case, the principle settled in that of Parris v. Brown, supra, was approved and followed: In Pryor v.
Cited 19 timesPublished696 S.W.2d 355 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1985
McKenna v. Sumner County Board of Education, 574 S.W.2d 527 (Tenn.1978). … See e.g., Humphreys County Board of Education v. Logan, 622 S.W.2d 553 (Tenn.App.1981) (administrative transfer of high school teachers not authorized without concurrence of superintendent and Board of Education).
Cited 2 timesPublished791 S.W.2d 21 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 21, 1990
As the Indiana Supreme Court noted in Benzins v. … See, e.g., Gordon v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division, 426 N.E.2d 1364 (Ind.App.1981).
Cited 11 timesPublished
Ask Donna