Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstenn

6,256 results

0.51s

  • State ex rel. Iverson v. Sheriff of Cook County

    186 Tenn. 349 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 3, 1948

    Munsey v. Clough, 196 U. S. 364, 373 , 25 S. Ct. 282, 284 , 49 L. Ed. 515 ; State ex rel. Lea v. Brown, supra, 169 Tenn. at page 682, 64 S. W. (2d) 841 ; Ex parte Reggel, 114 U. S. 642 , 5 S. Ct. 1148 , 29 L. … Brown v. Grosch, 177 Tenn. 619 , 152 S. W. (2d) 239 . For the reasons stated the assignments of error are dismissed and the judgment affirmed. All concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re: Loring Edwin Justice

    Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 16, 2021

    Justice’s discovery requests, the Board pointed out that section 24.3 of pre-2014 Rule 9 did not authorize discovery. The Board also relied on Moncier v. … Walwyn v. Bd. of Prof’l Resp., 481 S.W.3d 151, 165 (Tenn. 2015) (quoting West v. Schofield, 460 S.W.3d 113, 120 (Tenn. 2015)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Scandlyn v. Trotter

    153 Tenn. 30 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1925

    No estimate was made or reported by the board of education as called for by the act. … Justice Williams in his opinion in the Turnpike Co., Case, supra, is Murray v. Board of Com., 84 N. W., 103 , 81 Minn., 359 , 51 L. R. A., 828, 83 Am. St. Rep. 379 , which is particularly in point here.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Powers v. Journeymen Bricklayers' Union No. 3

    130 Tenn. 643 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1914

    Jacobs v. Cohen, 183 N. Y., 207 , 75 N. E., 5 , 2 L. R. A. (N. S.), 292, 111 Am. St. Rep., 730 , 5 Ann. Cas., 280; Mills v. U. S. Printing Co., 99 App Div., 605 , 91 N. Y. Supp., 185 . … Pickett v. Walsh, supra; Brown v. Brown, 86 Tenn., 277, 279, 310 , 6 S. W., 869 , 7 S. W., 640 ; Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Rainey, 120 Tenn., 357, 384 , 113 S. W., 397 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. United Mine Workers of America v. Askew

    176 Tenn. 234 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1940

    On petition for certiorari the controversy was taken into the chancery court of Campbell County under the style of Block Coal and Coke Company et al. v. District 19, United Mine Workers of America et al. … chancellor at Nashville was of opinion that there was no authority under the unemployment compensation laws to order payment of the benefits pending disposition of the appeal in the case of Block Coal and Coke Company et al. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Natacha D. Hudgins v. Global Personnel Solutions, Inc.

    Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 5, 2024

    HUDGINS v. GLOBAL PERSONNEL SOLUTIONS INC., ET AL. Appeal from the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims No. 2017-01-0690 Thomas L. Wyatt, Judge FILED No. … Madden v. Holland Grp. ' The Appeals Board here cited another Appeals Board opinion (Braden v. Mohawk Indus., Inc., No. 2019-08-0544, 2022 WL 625820, at *7 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ricky HARRIS v. STATE of Tennessee

    301 S.W.3d 141 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 14, 2010

    State v. Brown, 29 S.W.3d at 433-34. As in Chambers v. Mississippi and Green v. … State v. Brown, 29 S.W.3d at 431, 434.

    Overruled on other grounds by Tommy Nunley v. State of Tennessee, 552 S.W.3d 800 (2018)Cited 273 timesPublished
  • Lewis v. Allen

    698 S.W.2d 58 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 6, 1985

    Bellar v. Baptist Hospital, Inc., 559 S.W.2d 788, 790 (Tenn.1978). … See also, in addition to the cases cited in Kauffman, Donovan v. Barnes, 274 Or. 701 , 548 P.2d 980 (1976), and Groat v. Town Board of Town of Glenville, 73 A.D.2d 426 , 426 N.Y.S.2d 339 (1980).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Westgate Smoky Mountains at Gatlinburg v. Burns Phillips, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development

    426 S.W.3d 743 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 23, 2013

    P. 13(d); Wallace v. Sullivan, 561 S.W.2d 452, 453 (Tenn. 1978) (recognizing that the Board of Review’s conclusions of law are subject to de novo review with no presumption of correctness). … Dep’t. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Wolfe v. Henegar

    180 Tenn. 425 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1943

    In State ex rel. v. Hardin, 163 Tenn., 471 , 43 S. … Kempson v. Moore, 167 Tenn., 170, 178 , 67 S. W. (2d), 151, 153 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Nashville Trust Co. v. Smythe

    27 L.R.A. 663 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1895

    Brown’s subdivision. … Citing Olds v. Cummings, 31 Ill., *519 188 ; Walker v. Dement, 42 Ill., 272 ; Cramer v. Willetts, 61 Ill., 481 ; Haskell v. Brown, 65 Ill., 29 ; Temple v. Whittier, 117 Ill., 282 ; 7 N. E. Rep., 642; 44 N. W.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Public Ledger Co. v. Memphis

    93 Tenn. 77 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1893

    The Board reserves the right to reject any and all bids. “ By order of the Board. “W. L. Clapp, President.” “Attest: John J. Shea, Secretary.” … Kot denying the right of complainant as a tax-payer to enjoin defendant from the execution of an illegal contract, if it *81 would or might result in irreparable injury (Lynn v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Ralph

    6 S.W.3d 251 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1999

    McClellan v. Board of Regents of State University, 921 S.W.2d 684, 689 (Tenn.1996). … See State v. Brown, 188 Ariz. 358 , 936 P.2d 181 (1997); People v. Teamer, 20 Cal.App.4th 1454 , 25 Cal.Rptr.2d 296 (1994); State v. Stephens, 601 So.2d 1195 (Fla.1992); People v.

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Cope v. Davidson County

    198 Tenn. 24 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1955

    Davidson County Board of Education. … This Court very recently had the question before it in Board of Commissioners of Union City v. Obion County, 188 Tenn. 666 , 222 S. W. (2d) 7, 8 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Petre v. Bruce

    157 Tenn. 131 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1928

    Eq., 263; Whittaker v. Kilby, 106 N. Y. Supp., 511 ; Reese v. Bank, 31 Pa., 78 ; Electric Co. v. Edicon Electric Co., 200 Pa. St., 516; Jones v. Ry. Co., 67 N. H., 119; Crosby v. … Dunn v. Acme Co. (Wis.), 169 N. W., 279 ; Jones v. Morrison (Minn.), 16 N. W., 854 ; Elliott v. Baker, 194 Mass., 518 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • McCampbell v. Fountain Head Railroad

    111 Tenn. 55 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1903

    In Taylor v. … And in Smith v. Clay, 3 Brown, Oh., 639, it was announced that “nothing can call forth this court into activity but conscience, good faith, and reasonable diligence.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Glen Howard

    504 S.W.3d 260 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 12, 2016

    He also argues that this Court should apply our holding in State v. Brown and find that this testimony was ―critical to the defense.‖ 29 S.W.3d 427 (Tenn. 2000). … On appeal, defendant also argues that the Brown decision should apply to this issue. See Brown. 29 S.W.3d at 343.

    Cited 129 timesPublished
  • Memphis Street Railway Co. v. Flood

    122 Tenn. 56 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1908

    . *63 The first case decided by this court involving this question, called to onr attention, is that of Parris v. Brown, 5 Yerg., 267 . … While the warrant was held to state a cause of action in that case, the principle settled in that of Parris v. Brown, supra, was approved and followed: In Pryor v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Hyde v. Bills

    696 S.W.2d 355 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1985

    McKenna v. Sumner County Board of Education, 574 S.W.2d 527 (Tenn.1978). … See e.g., Humphreys County Board of Education v. Logan, 622 S.W.2d 553 (Tenn.App.1981) (administrative transfer of high school teachers not authorized without concurrence of superintendent and Board of Education).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Simmons v. Traughber

    791 S.W.2d 21 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 21, 1990

    As the Indiana Supreme Court noted in Benzins v. … See, e.g., Gordon v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division, 426 N.E.2d 1364 (Ind.App.1981).

    Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.