Case law

Larue v. Anderson County

194 Tenn. 525 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1952

amicus curiae brief of the United States refer to the case of State v. … Holtzclaw v. Hamilton County, 101 Tenn. 338, 341 , 47 S. W. 421 .

Bradley v. Carnes

94 Tenn. 27 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1894

Booker v. Booker, 5 Hum., 507 ; Brown v. Hunt, 12 Heis., 409; Read v. Watkins, 11 Lea,. 161. Still, tbe power of disposition .may be given not only in express words, but also by words necessarily implying such power. … Sevier v. Brown, 2 Swan, 112 , 116; Howard v. Camsi, 109 U. S., 725 ; Jones v. Bacon, 23 Am. Rep., 1 ; Ballentine v. Spear, 2 Bax., 273 . The other class of cases is illustrated in Deuderick v.

State Ex Rel. Burkhart v. Coldwell

185 Tenn. 572 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1947

Cravens v. Delk, 175 Tenn. 614 , 136 S. … Under the facts that the Beer Board had before it, we cannot say that it acted arbitrarily, illegally, or capriciously. In State ex rel. Cravens v.

Albright v. Albright

192 Tenn. 326 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1951

Waddle, Adm’r v. Terry, 44 Tenn. 51 ; Brown v. Hunt, 59 Tenn. 404 ; Armstrong v. Park’s Devisees, 28 Tenn. 195 ; Hill v. Hill, 159 Tenn. 27 , 16 S. W. (2d) 27, 28 , and Latta v. Brown, 96 Tenn. 343 , 34 S. … Armstrong v. Park’s Devisees; 9 Humph. ([195], 28 Tenn.), 195; Latta v. Brown, 96 Tenn. 343 , 34 S. W. 417 , 31 L. R. A. 840, and cases there cited.

Griffin v. State

604 S.W.2d 40 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 18, 1980

In Brown v. … Brown v. Texas, supra.

Judy Kilburn v. Granite State Insurance Company

522 S.W.3d 384 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 10, 2017

His employer was Ryan Brown (“Employer”). Kilburn v. Granite State Ins. Co., No. M2011-00011-WC-R3-WC, 2011 WL 10621663, at *1 (Tenn. Workers Comp. Panel Nov. 30, 2011). 1 As a result of the accident, Mr. … Hazlewood was a board-certified physician in physical medicine, rehabilitation, and pain management and had been practicing in pain management for nineteen years.

Love v. Nelson

8 Tenn. 563 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1827

Chitty on Bills, 343; Smith v. Kendal, 6 Term Rep. 123; Brown v. Harridon, 4 Term Rep. 148. … v.

Safier v. Atkins

199 Tenn. 574 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1956

Saper stein v. Bass, 177 Tenn. 609 , 152 S. W. (2d) 236 ; McCanless v. Klein, 182 Tenn. 631 , 188 S. W. (2d) 745 . … Park v. Beasley, 182 Tenn. 523 , 188 S. W. (2d) 333 . .

Barfield v. Wilson

669 S.W.2d 91 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1984

For example, in Burnham v. … Ewoldt v. American National Ins. Co., 190 Neb. 290 , 207 N.W.2d 521 (1973); Sunset Life Ins. Co. of America v. Crosby, 85 Idaho 407 , 380 P.2d 9 (1963); Illinois Bankers Life Association v.

Aluminum Co. of America v. Walker

207 Tenn. 417 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1960

It is said in the text of 165 A.L.R. at page 1393, quoting from the New Hampshire case of Hallahan v. … There appears in appellant’s brief this appropriate quotation from the New York case of Heater v.

Tindell Home Center, Inc. v. Union Peoples Bank of Anderson County

543 S.W.2d 843 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1976

Green v. Williams, 92 Tenn. 220 , 21 S.W. 520 (1890); McDonald v. Amo, 162 Tenn. 36 , 34 S.W.2d 212 (1931). … See Brown v. Brown & Co., 25 Tenn.App. 509 , 160 S.W.2d 431 (1941).

State Ex Rel. Butler v. Dugger

172 Tenn. 281 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1938

The relator seeks to bring’ this case under the authority of Savage v. Macadam Co., 5 Tenn. App., 377 , in which this court denied the petition for certiorari. That case is no authority here. … Wayne county is not here complaining, as was Hamilton county in State ex rel. v. Hamilton County, 170 Tenn., 371 , 95 S. W. (2d), 618 . The relator has no such interest as will permit him to raise this question.

State Ex Rel. United Mine Workers of America v. Askew

176 Tenn. 234 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1940

On petition for certiorari the controversy was taken into the chancery court of Campbell County under the style of Block Coal and Coke Company et al. v. District 19, United Mine Workers of America et al. … chancellor at Nashville was of opinion that there was no authority under the unemployment compensation laws to order payment of the benefits pending disposition of the appeal in the case of Block Coal and Coke Company et al. v.

Bridges v. Cavalier Corp.

212 Tenn. 237 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1963

A Board of Review granted unemployment compensation. … Then probably the main reason that the Board of Review reversed its former holding was that the Board said that for the first time Section 50-1349, subd. A had been called to the Board’s attention.

Cagle v. McCanless

199 Tenn. 128 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1955

This was not a compelling reason for holding that said County Boards of Shelby County were public officers within the meaning of the Constitution. In Dykes v. Hamilton County, 183 Tenn. 71 , 191 S. … See also Donathan v. McMinn County, 187 Tenn. 220 , 213 S. W. (2d) 173 ; Phillips v. West, 187 Tenn. 57 , 213 S. W. (2d) 3 , opinion by Tomlinson, J.; Kyle v. Marcom, 181 Tenn. 57 , 178 S. W. (2d) 618 .

Warner v. Yates

118 Tenn. 548 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1907

Lumber Co. v. Loeb, 110 Term., 251, 75 S. W., 1043 . … Brown v. Brown, 2 Sneed, 432 ; Murry v. Conner, 4 Baxt., 220 ; Lane v. Wood, 1 Tenn. Cas., 648 .

State of Tennessee v. Mark Anthony McNack

356 S.W.3d 906 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 13, 2011

Brown, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellant, State of Tennessee. George Morton Googe, District Public Defender, and Gregory D. … (b) Offenders shall not be excluded from the program on the basis of prior convictions for nonviolent felony offenses, but may, at the discretion of the court and local community corrections advisory board

Westgate Smoky Mountains at Gatlinburg v. Burns Phillips, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development

426 S.W.3d 743 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 23, 2013

P. 13(d); Wallace v. Sullivan, 561 S.W.2d 452, 453 (Tenn. 1978) (recognizing that the Board of Review’s conclusions of law are subject to de novo review with no presumption of correctness). … Dep’t. v.

Love v. Nelson

8 Tenn. 563 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1827

Chitty on Bills, 343; Smith v. Kendal, 6 Term Rep. 123; Brown v. Harridon, 4 Term Rep. 148. … v.

State Ex Rel. Wolfe v. Henegar

180 Tenn. 425 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1943

In State ex rel. v. Hardin, 163 Tenn., 471 , 43 S. … Kempson v. Moore, 167 Tenn., 170, 178 , 67 S. W. (2d), 151, 153 .