Case law

A. G. S. Railroad v. Wright

175 Tenn. 138 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1939

The showing that one Lancaster, who was ahead of deceased on the extra board, was cut off the board on April 15th, proves nothing because there is no showing why Lancaster was dropped from the board. … White v. Pinkerton Co., 155 Tenn., 229 , 291 S. W., 448 . With the above noted modification the judgment of • the trial judge is affirmed, and the case remanded. Appellant will pay the costs of the appeal.

Gibson v. Ferguson

562 S.W.2d 188 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1976

Brooks v. State, 187 Tenn. 67 , 213 S.W.2d 7 (1948). … Adams v. Monroe County Quarterly Court, 214 Tenn. 270 , 379 S.W.2d 769, 771 (1964); Cantrell v. DeKalb County Beer Board, 213 Tenn. 568 , 376 S.W.2d 480 (1964).

West Tenneessee Flood Control & Soil Conservation Dist. v. Wyatt

193 Tenn. 566 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1952

The Court in Arnold v. … Bigham v. Powers and Arnold v. City of Knoxville.

Shelton v. Hurst

84 Tenn. 470 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1886

Brown. The father owned lands out of which dower and homstead were assigned. Brown and wife sold the homestead to Fielding Hurst. … In Boyett v.

In re Bowers

137 Tenn. 193 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1916

King v. Hampton, 3 Hayw., 59 ; Miller v. Conlee, 5 Sneed, 432 ; State v. Bank, 5 Sneed, 577 ; State v. Sneed, 105 Tenn., 711 , 58 S. W., 1070 ; Railroad v. Byrne, 119 Tenn., 278 , 104 S. W., 460 ; State ex rel. v. … State v. Bank, supra.

State Ex Rel. Clement v. Dodson

169 Tenn. 178 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1935

This is necessarily so with respect to all licensing boards of this character where the power to review is not conferred upon the courts. *180 In O. P. Dobson v. J. J. … In the absence of an affirmative allegation in the certificate that the act of 1929 was not observed "by the board when the certificate was renewed in 1933, it will be conclusively presumed that the board performed their

Douglas v. State

921 S.W.2d 180 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1996

Virginia Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 748 , 96 S.Ct. 1817 , 48 L.Ed.2d 346 (1976); Bigelow v. Virginia, 421 U.S. 809 , 95 S.Ct. 2222 , 44 L.Ed.2d 600 (1975); H & L Messengers, Inc. v. … Edenfield v.

Goldsmith's Division, Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. City of Memphis

484 S.W.2d 538 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1972

Treadwell Realty Co. v. City of Memphis, 173 Tenn. 168 , 116 S.W.2d 997 (1937). On facts somewhat similar, this Court said in W. J. Savage Co. v. … This Court applied this clause in Metropolitan Government of Nashville v.

Curtis v. State Ex Rel. Moreland

163 Tenn. 220 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1931

Stewart v. Board of Inspection, 74 Tenn. (6 Lea), 12, 20; Taylor v. Carr, 125 Tenn., 235, 257 , and cases there cited. … Curry v.

Algee v. State

200 Tenn. 127 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1956

Howell v. Sensing, 188 Tenn. 684 , 222 S.W.2d 13 . … The question is closely related to the holding of this Court in the case of Gallien v. Miller, 170 Tenn. 93 , 92 S.W.2d 403 .

State ex rel. Maynard v. Armstrong

200 Tenn. 191 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1956

We think it was settled in our case of Troutman v. … It is clear from reading Troutman v. Crippen, supra, that these budgets to be submitted by the county commission should cover all of the operating expenses of the county.

Williams Lumber & Supply Co. v. Poarch

221 Tenn. 540 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 10, 1968

v. … Brown v. Brown & Co. (1941) 25 Tenn.App. 509 , 160 S.W.2d 431 , is not authority for such a view of the present case.

State ex rel. Stewart v. Marks

74 Tenn. 12 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1880

This court has so held: Saffrons v. Ericson, 3 Cold., 1 . … United States, 12 Pet., 524 ; Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 49; State v. Lawrence, 3 Kan., 95 .

Adcock v. Houk

122 Tenn. 269 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1909

, for a term of two years, against the new board elected on tbe first Thursday in June, 1909. … Tbe old board was composed of T. J. Adcock, mayor, J. M. Wood, recorder, and Robert Snow, Sam Milwee, Joe Ford, Sam De Armond, Sam Johnson, and F. E. Stanford, aider-men. Tbe new board is composed of M. M.

Austin v. Jennings

211 Tenn. 485 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1963

Queener v. Magnet Mills, Inc., supra, 179 Tenn. 422 , 167 S.W.2d 1 ; Anderson v. Aluminum Co. of America, supra. … City of Paris v. Paris-Henry County Public Utility District, 207 Tenn. 388, 398 , 340 S.W.2d 885, 890 ; Logan v. Reaves, 209 Tenn. 631, 638 , 354 S.W.2d 789 , and cases there cited.

Randall v. Hankins

733 S.W.2d 871 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1987

The facts are set out in the opinion of the Court of Appeals in its initial review of the case, Randall v. Hankins, 675 S.W.2d 712 (Tenn.App.1984). … This decision was reversed on the facts by the Court of Appeals in its first opinion, Randall v.

Robinson v. LeCorps

83 S.W.3d 718 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 5, 2002

Browder v. Morris, 975 S.W.2d 308, 311 (Tenn.1998) (citing Austin v. Memphis Pub. Co., 655 S.W.2d 146, 148 (Tenn.1983)). … LeCorps was board certified in ortho-paedic surgery. 5 .

Gamble v. Kelley

219 Tenn. 311 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1966

In Williams v. … See Williams v. Realty Development Company, supra. It results Charles K.

State v. Hanson

279 S.W.3d 265 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 23, 2009

State v. … The requested language was taken from Brown Shoe Co. v.

Reeves v. State ex rel. Thompson

199 Tenn. 598 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1956

Brown v. Grosch, 177 Tenn. 619, 624 , 152 S. W. (2d) 239 . … Brown v.