Case law

Hartwell Motor Co., Inc. v. Hickerson

160 Tenn. 513 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1930

The board found for the claimant. … , but, on the contrary, conclusively show that he was killed in an attempt to board or leave a moving train, precluding any award under the ruling in Pope v.

Harris v. State

207 Tenn. 538 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1960

Cleek v. State, supra; Van Pelt v. State, supra; Burks v. State, supra. … In Burks v.

Sanders v. Parks

718 S.W.2d 676 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1986

Donathan v. McMinn County

187 Tenn. 220 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1948

Reams v. Board of Mayor and Aldermen, 155 Tenn. 222, 225 , 291 S. W. 1067 . … The “county board of education is a part of the State’s educational system.” Boswell v. Powell, 163 Tenn. 445, 448 , 43 S. W. 2d 495, 496 .

Stanford v. Howard

103 Tenn. 24 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1899

Whiteside v. The Executors, Cooke, 383; Shannon, Secs. 3161, 3162, 3163, et seq.; Nichol v. Batton, 3 Yer., 474 . " In the later case, decided in Kentucky, 1846, the case of Brown v. Watson, 6 B. … Monroe, 588, it appeared that Watson staked a horse upon a race with Brown. The race was not run, but Watson gave up the horse as a forfeit to Brown under their contract.

West Tenneessee Flood Control & Soil Conservation Dist. v. Wyatt

193 Tenn. 566 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1952

The Court in Arnold v. … Bigham v. Powers and Arnold v. City of Knoxville.

State ex rel. Bolt v. Drummond

128 Tenn. 271 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1913

Henley v. State, 98 Tenn., 706 -8, 41 S. W., 352 , 1104, 39 L. R. A., 126. The act is not an express repeal .or amendment of any statute. None is mentioned, either in its caption, body, or otherwise. Henley v. … Hunter v. Memphis, 93 Tenn., 574 , 26 S. W., 828 , and authorities there cited.

In the Matter of All Assessments, Review of Ad Valorum

58 S.W.3d 95 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 16, 2000

In Sherwood Co. v. … In Northwest Airlines, Inc. v.

In re Sneed

302 S.W.3d 825 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 26, 2010

Sneed by the Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee (“Board”). The Petition and Supplemental Petition filed by the Board allege that Mr. … The Board further claimed that Mr.

Rogers v. Butler

170 Tenn. 125 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1936

McAndrews v. Hamilton County, 105 Tenn., 399 , 58 S. W., 483 . … See Gamble v. Vanderbilt University, 138 Tenn., 616 , 200 S. W., 510 , L. R.

Middle Tennessee Electric Membership Corp. v. State ex rel. Adams

193 Tenn. 513 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1952

The officers are elected from and by that Board of Trustees. Appellant, Dr. Hutchinson, has been a member and president of the Board since the organization of the corporation in about 1936. … Church, South v. Board of Trust of Vanderbilt University, 129 Tenn. 279, 341 , 164 S. W. 1151 . When the construction of any such by-law is called *516 in question its construction presents a question of law.

A. G. S. Railroad v. Wright

175 Tenn. 138 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1939

The showing that one Lancaster, who was ahead of deceased on the extra board, was cut off the board on April 15th, proves nothing because there is no showing why Lancaster was dropped from the board. … White v. Pinkerton Co., 155 Tenn., 229 , 291 S. W., 448 . With the above noted modification the judgment of • the trial judge is affirmed, and the case remanded. Appellant will pay the costs of the appeal.

Runnells v. Rogers

596 S.W.2d 87 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1980

This Code section provides, in pertinent part: The formal statement of the board . shall be admissible at a subsequent trial as an exception to the hearsay rule. We noted in Baldwin v. … As this Court observed in Haskins v.

Whitthorne v. Turner

155 Tenn. 303 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1927

Hunter v. Conner, 152 Tenn., 273 -4; Haynes v. State. 3 Humph., 480 . But after the right of compensation vests, the amount could not be added to or subtracted from. … 24, which by indirection suggests that the county board may allow compensation for services as secretary of the board.

State ex rel. Stewart v. Marks

74 Tenn. 12 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1880

This court has so held: Saffrons v. Ericson, 3 Cold., 1 . … United States, 12 Pet., 524 ; Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 49; State v. Lawrence, 3 Kan., 95 .

Robinson v. LeCorps

83 S.W.3d 718 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 5, 2002

Browder v. Morris, 975 S.W.2d 308, 311 (Tenn.1998) (citing Austin v. Memphis Pub. Co., 655 S.W.2d 146, 148 (Tenn.1983)). … LeCorps was board certified in ortho-paedic surgery. 5 .

Gibson v. Ferguson

562 S.W.2d 188 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1976

Brooks v. State, 187 Tenn. 67 , 213 S.W.2d 7 (1948). … Adams v. Monroe County Quarterly Court, 214 Tenn. 270 , 379 S.W.2d 769, 771 (1964); Cantrell v. DeKalb County Beer Board, 213 Tenn. 568 , 376 S.W.2d 480 (1964).

Gamble v. Kelley

219 Tenn. 311 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1966

In Williams v. … See Williams v. Realty Development Company, supra. It results Charles K.

In re Bowers

137 Tenn. 193 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1916

King v. Hampton, 3 Hayw., 59 ; Miller v. Conlee, 5 Sneed, 432 ; State v. Bank, 5 Sneed, 577 ; State v. Sneed, 105 Tenn., 711 , 58 S. W., 1070 ; Railroad v. Byrne, 119 Tenn., 278 , 104 S. W., 460 ; State ex rel. v. … State v. Bank, supra.

Ogden v. Kelley

594 S.W.2d 702 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1980

The rules and regulations shall govern proceedings pursuant to this section whether held by the state board of education, or by a county, city, or special school district board of education.” … See Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County v. Shacklett, 554 S.W.2d 601 (Tenn.1977).