Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,256 results
1.19s
180 Tenn. 483 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1944
State ex rel. v. City of Memphis, 147 Tenn., 658 , 251 S. W., 46 , 27 A. L. R., 1257. … Walton v. Cotton, 19 How., U. S., 355., 358, 15 L. Ed., 658, 660 . The force and effect of such statutes are not to be confined to their literal terms. Yates County Nat. Bank v. Carpenter, 119 N. Y., 550 , 23 N.
Cited 12 timesPublishedArlene Ernstes v. Printpack, Inc.
Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 2, 2024
Ernstes v. Printpack, Inc., No. 2020-07-0617, 2022 WL 17825267, at *4 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Dec. 15, 2022). The Appeals Board found the following colloquy (related to the 2019 visit to Dr. … Initially, the Appeals Board determined that the statute of limitations issue was waived for failure to raise the issue in the first appeal and was nevertheless without rnerit. Ernstes v.
Cited 0 timesPublished185 Tenn. 156 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1947
City of Chattanooga v. Jackson, 172 Tenn. 264 , 111 S. … The legislature may confer discretion on some board in the administration of a statute which the legislature enacts, and vest in that board the “power to adjudicate all matters arising under the statute”. Richardson v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedState of Tennessee v. Jimmy Dale Qualls
482 S.W.3d 1 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 28, 2016
(quoting State v. Brown, 823 S.W.2d 576, 583 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991) [hereinafter Brown I] (internal quotation marks omitted))). … State v. Brown, 992 S.W.2d 389, 391 (Tenn. 1999) [hereinafter Brown III] (citing Tidwell, 922 S.W.2d at 500-01; Burlison v. State, 501 S.W.2d 801, 803 (Tenn. 1973)).
Cited 43 timesPublishedCentral Surety & Insurance v. Mrs. Cora Trawick Court
162 Tenn. 477 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1931
alone (Hartford Indemnity Co. v. … Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission, 170 Pac., 1074 ; Cook’s Case, 29 A. L. R., 114, Note C, p. 124; Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co., 20 A. L. R., Annotation, p. 319.
Cited 27 timesPublishedSimpson v. Frontier Community Credit Union
810 S.W.2d 147 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 6, 1991
v. … In Brown , we held that “T.C.A. § 50-916 [now T.C.A. § 50-6-114] clearly forbids [reduction] of compensation benefits.” Brown, 646 S.W.2d at 912 .
Cited 222 timesPublished123 S.W.3d 335 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 1, 2003
See State v. Huddleston, 924 S.W.2d 666, 674 (Tenn.1996). In making our evaluation, we look to the factors articulated by the Supreme Court in Brown v. … See Brown, 422 U.S. at 604 , 95 5.Ct. 2254. The first Brown factor for our consideration is the temporal proximity of the illegal seizure and consent.
Cited 173 timesPublished217 Tenn. 534 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1966
The case of Clark v. Liquor Control Board of Texas, 357 S.W.2d 176 (Texas Civ. App. 1962) is similar to the case at bar. … In Case v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedState of Tennessee v. Linnell Richmond
90 S.W.3d 648 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 1, 2002
Officer Waggoner further identified photos of Shannon Brown’s clothing with a bullet hole, a wound on Shannon Brown’s side and a picture of Shannon Brown. … In Cavert v.
Cited 113 timesPublishedModern Upholstered Chair Co. v. Russell
518 S.W.2d 519 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1974
After summarizing its holding and quoting therefrom, the Court said: From our reading of Brown Shoe Co. v. … Considering all the testimony in the light of Brown Show Company v. Reed, Central Motor v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCharles GROGAN v. Daniel UGGLA, Et Al.
535 S.W.3d 864 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 21, 2017
See Biscan v. Brown, 160 S.W.3d 462, 483 (Tenn. 2005) (holding that a parent voluntarily assumed duty of reasonable care as to minors who attended his daughter’s party at the parent’s home); see also Wallis v. … App. 1987); Brown v, Michigan Millers Mut. Ins. Co., 665 S.W.2d 630, 632 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983); Dieter v. Hand, 214 Neb, 257, 333 N.W.2d 772, 775 (1983); Corson v. Liberty Mut. Ins.
Cited 20 timesPublished141 Tenn. 169 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1918
And, in said case of Manlove v. … Alexander v. Miller, 7 Heisk., 65 ; Hope v. Wilkinson, 14 Lea, 21 , 52 Am. Rep., 149 ; Douglass v. Baber, 15 Lea, 651 ; Overton v. Lea, 108 Tenn., 505 , 68 S. W., 250 .
Cited 13 timesPublishedAmerican Mut. Liability Ins. v. Garth
174 Tenn. 297 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1939
Counsel for defendants cite and rely on Code, section 6-861, and the holdings of this Court in Brown v. Birmingham Nurseries, 173 Tenn., 343 , 117 S. W. (2d), 739 ; Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. … Not only does willful connote intentional, purposeful violation of orders, as said in Brown v. Birmingham Nurseries, supra, but also an element of perverseness.
Cited 6 timesPublishedHalbert v. Shelby County Election Commission
31 S.W.3d 246 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 6, 2000
Myint v. Allstate Ins. … Election Com’n v. Turner, 755 S.W.2d 774, 777 (Tenn.1988). However, several courts have found that a durational registration requirement for candidacy is unconstitutional. See Board of Sup’rs of Elections v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedWard v. North American Rayon Corporation
211 Tenn. 535 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1963
Chief Justice Hughes, Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126, 127, 140 ; Cude v. … Spence, 198 Tenn. 316, 321 , 279 S.W.2d 509 ; London & Lancashire v. Starcher, 202 Tenn. 278, 281, 282 , 304 S.W.2d 87, 88-89 ; Brown Shoe Co. v. Reed, 209 Tenn. 106, 117 , 350 S.W.2d 65, 70 .
Cited 25 timesPublished115 Tenn. 175 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1905
Hitchcock v. Galveston, 96 U. S., 341 , 24 L. Ed., 659 ; Chapman v. Douglass county, 107 U. S., 348 , 2 Sup. Ct., 62, 27 L. Ed., 378 ; Argenti v. San Francisco, 16 Cal., 282 ; and Land Co. v. … of edu *188 cation to manage and control them, and that there is a reserved power in the State to enlarge or extinguish these boards (Edmondson v.
Cited 9 timesPublished216 Tenn. 391 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1965
Section 50-1325 (I); Moore v. Commissioner of Employment Security, 197 Tenn. 444, 273 S.W.2d 703 (1954); Milne Chair Com *397 pany v. Hake, 190 Tenn. 395 , 230 S.W.2d 393 (1950); Miller v. … Ezell v. Hake, 184 Tenn. 319 , 198 S.W.2d 809 (1947); Clinton v. Hake, 185 Tenn. 476 , 206 S.W.2d 889 (1947); Adams v. American Lava Corp., 188 Tenn. 69 , 216 S.W.2d 728 (1948).
Cited 5 timesPublished173 S.W.3d 401 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 29, 2005
However, those cases following Brown in which the alleged offenses occurred after the statutory revision in 1989 apparently misapplied Brown, in that those cases should have been analyzed under the amended statutes.3 … include: State v.
Cited 131 timesPublishedKnox County v. State Ex Rel. Nighbert
177 Tenn. 171 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1940
State ex rel. v. Hamilton County, 170 Tenn., 371 , 95 S. W. (2d), 618 ; Anderson v. Carter County, 172 Tenn., 114 , 110 S. W. (2d), 321 ; State ex rel. v. Trotter, 153 Tenn., 30 , 281 S. W., 925 . … In the case of Morley v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBanks v. Dement Const. Co., Inc.
817 S.W.2d 16 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1991
Toney v. Mueller Co., 810 S.W.2d 145 (Tenn.1991); Travis v. City of Murfreesboro, 686 S.W.2d 68, 70 (Tenn. 1985). … Lee v. Crenshaw, 622 F.2d 202, 203 (6th Cir.1980). Brown v. Consolidation Coal Co., 518 S.W.2d 234 (Tenn.1974), relied upon by the employee, is no authority for his position.
Cited 121 timesPublished
Ask Donna