Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstenn

6,256 results

1.19s

  • Collins v. City of Knoxville

    180 Tenn. 483 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1944

    State ex rel. v. City of Memphis, 147 Tenn., 658 , 251 S. W., 46 , 27 A. L. R., 1257. … Walton v. Cotton, 19 How., U. S., 355., 358, 15 L. Ed., 658, 660 . The force and effect of such statutes are not to be confined to their literal terms. Yates County Nat. Bank v. Carpenter, 119 N. Y., 550 , 23 N.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Arlene Ernstes v. Printpack, Inc.

    Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 2, 2024

    Ernstes v. Printpack, Inc., No. 2020-07-0617, 2022 WL 17825267, at *4 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Dec. 15, 2022). The Appeals Board found the following colloquy (related to the 2019 visit to Dr. … Initially, the Appeals Board determined that the statute of limitations issue was waived for failure to raise the issue in the first appeal and was nevertheless without rnerit. Ernstes v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Large v. City of Elizabethton

    185 Tenn. 156 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1947

    City of Chattanooga v. Jackson, 172 Tenn. 264 , 111 S. … The legislature may confer discretion on some board in the administration of a statute which the legislature enacts, and vest in that board the “power to adjudicate all matters arising under the statute”. Richardson v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Jimmy Dale Qualls

    482 S.W.3d 1 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 28, 2016

    (quoting State v. Brown, 823 S.W.2d 576, 583 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991) [hereinafter Brown I] (internal quotation marks omitted))). … State v. Brown, 992 S.W.2d 389, 391 (Tenn. 1999) [hereinafter Brown III] (citing Tidwell, 922 S.W.2d at 500-01; Burlison v. State, 501 S.W.2d 801, 803 (Tenn. 1973)).

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Central Surety & Insurance v. Mrs. Cora Trawick Court

    162 Tenn. 477 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1931

    alone (Hartford Indemnity Co. v. … Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission, 170 Pac., 1074 ; Cook’s Case, 29 A. L. R., 114, Note C, p. 124; Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co., 20 A. L. R., Annotation, p. 319.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Simpson v. Frontier Community Credit Union

    810 S.W.2d 147 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 6, 1991

    v. … In Brown , we held that “T.C.A. § 50-916 [now T.C.A. § 50-6-114] clearly forbids [reduction] of compensation benefits.” Brown, 646 S.W.2d at 912 .

    Cited 222 timesPublished
  • State v. Garcia

    123 S.W.3d 335 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 1, 2003

    See State v. Huddleston, 924 S.W.2d 666, 674 (Tenn.1996). In making our evaluation, we look to the factors articulated by the Supreme Court in Brown v. … See Brown, 422 U.S. at 604 , 95 5.Ct. 2254. The first Brown factor for our consideration is the temporal proximity of the illegal seizure and consent.

    Cited 173 timesPublished
  • Ewin v. Richardson

    217 Tenn. 534 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1966

    The case of Clark v. Liquor Control Board of Texas, 357 S.W.2d 176 (Texas Civ. App. 1962) is similar to the case at bar. … In Case v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Linnell Richmond

    90 S.W.3d 648 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 1, 2002

    Officer Waggoner further identified photos of Shannon Brown’s clothing with a bullet hole, a wound on Shannon Brown’s side and a picture of Shannon Brown. … In Cavert v.

    Cited 113 timesPublished
  • Modern Upholstered Chair Co. v. Russell

    518 S.W.2d 519 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1974

    After summarizing its holding and quoting therefrom, the Court said: From our reading of Brown Shoe Co. v. … Considering all the testimony in the light of Brown Show Company v. Reed, Central Motor v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Charles GROGAN v. Daniel UGGLA, Et Al.

    535 S.W.3d 864 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 21, 2017

    See Biscan v. Brown, 160 S.W.3d 462, 483 (Tenn. 2005) (holding that a parent voluntarily assumed duty of reasonable care as to minors who attended his daughter’s party at the parent’s home); see also Wallis v. … App. 1987); Brown v, Michigan Millers Mut. Ins. Co., 665 S.W.2d 630, 632 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983); Dieter v. Hand, 214 Neb, 257, 333 N.W.2d 772, 775 (1983); Corson v. Liberty Mut. Ins.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Ford v. Cottrell

    141 Tenn. 169 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1918

    And, in said case of Manlove v. … Alexander v. Miller, 7 Heisk., 65 ; Hope v. Wilkinson, 14 Lea, 21 , 52 Am. Rep., 149 ; Douglass v. Baber, 15 Lea, 651 ; Overton v. Lea, 108 Tenn., 505 , 68 S. W., 250 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • American Mut. Liability Ins. v. Garth

    174 Tenn. 297 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1939

    Counsel for defendants cite and rely on Code, section 6-861, and the holdings of this Court in Brown v. Birmingham Nurseries, 173 Tenn., 343 , 117 S. W. (2d), 739 ; Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. … Not only does willful connote intentional, purposeful violation of orders, as said in Brown v. Birmingham Nurseries, supra, but also an element of perverseness.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Halbert v. Shelby County Election Commission

    31 S.W.3d 246 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 6, 2000

    Myint v. Allstate Ins. … Election Com’n v. Turner, 755 S.W.2d 774, 777 (Tenn.1988). However, several courts have found that a durational registration requirement for candidacy is unconstitutional. See Board of Sup’rs of Elections v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Ward v. North American Rayon Corporation

    211 Tenn. 535 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1963

    Chief Justice Hughes, Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126, 127, 140 ; Cude v. … Spence, 198 Tenn. 316, 321 , 279 S.W.2d 509 ; London & Lancashire v. Starcher, 202 Tenn. 278, 281, 282 , 304 S.W.2d 87, 88-89 ; Brown Shoe Co. v. Reed, 209 Tenn. 106, 117 , 350 S.W.2d 65, 70 .

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • State v. Mayor of Knoxville

    115 Tenn. 175 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1905

    Hitchcock v. Galveston, 96 U. S., 341 , 24 L. Ed., 659 ; Chapman v. Douglass county, 107 U. S., 348 , 2 Sup. Ct., 62, 27 L. Ed., 378 ; Argenti v. San Francisco, 16 Cal., 282 ; and Land Co. v. … of edu *188 cation to manage and control them, and that there is a reserved power in the State to enlarge or extinguish these boards (Edmondson v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Duke v. Scott

    216 Tenn. 391 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1965

    Section 50-1325 (I); Moore v. Commissioner of Employment Security, 197 Tenn. 444, 273 S.W.2d 703 (1954); Milne Chair Com *397 pany v. Hake, 190 Tenn. 395 , 230 S.W.2d 393 (1950); Miller v. … Ezell v. Hake, 184 Tenn. 319 , 198 S.W.2d 809 (1947); Clinton v. Hake, 185 Tenn. 476 , 206 S.W.2d 889 (1947); Adams v. American Lava Corp., 188 Tenn. 69 , 216 S.W.2d 728 (1948).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Jackson

    173 S.W.3d 401 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 29, 2005

    However, those cases following Brown in which the alleged offenses occurred after the statutory revision in 1989 apparently misapplied Brown, in that those cases should have been analyzed under the amended statutes.3 … include: State v.

    Cited 131 timesPublished
  • Knox County v. State Ex Rel. Nighbert

    177 Tenn. 171 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1940

    State ex rel. v. Hamilton County, 170 Tenn., 371 , 95 S. W. (2d), 618 ; Anderson v. Carter County, 172 Tenn., 114 , 110 S. W. (2d), 321 ; State ex rel. v. Trotter, 153 Tenn., 30 , 281 S. W., 925 . … In the case of Morley v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Banks v. Dement Const. Co., Inc.

    817 S.W.2d 16 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1991

    Toney v. Mueller Co., 810 S.W.2d 145 (Tenn.1991); Travis v. City of Murfreesboro, 686 S.W.2d 68, 70 (Tenn. 1985). … Lee v. Crenshaw, 622 F.2d 202, 203 (6th Cir.1980). Brown v. Consolidation Coal Co., 518 S.W.2d 234 (Tenn.1974), relied upon by the employee, is no authority for his position.

    Cited 121 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.