Case law

Nashville Electric Service v. Luna

185 Tenn. 175 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 6, 1947

In this situation and duty of the Board, under our holdings in Rogers v. … In Saulman v.

Spivey v. Reasoner

191 Tenn. 350 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 3, 1950

Rose v. Brown, 176 Tenn. 429 , 143 S. W. (2d) 303 . … Rose v. Brown, supra. Writ denied. All concur.

Phillips v. West

187 Tenn. 57 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1948

Buena Vista Special School Dist. v. Board of Election Com’rs, 173 Tenn. 198, 201 , 116 S. W. (2d) 1008 . … A member of a County Board of Education is a county officer. State ex rel. v. Groce, 152 Tenn. 566, 570 , 280 S.

Manning v. Feidelson

175 Tenn. 576 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1940

Sheffy v. Mitchell, 142 Tenn., 48, 50 , 215 S. W., 403 ; Board of Directors v. Bodkin Bros., 108 Tenn., 700 , 69 S. W., 270 ; Baker v. Mitchell, 105 Tenn., 610 , 59 S. W., 137 ; White v. … Harmon v. Tyler, 112 Tenn., 8 , 83 S. W., 1041 ; Board of Directors v. Bodkin Bros., supra; Ridley v. Halliday, 106 Tenn., 607 , 61 8. W., 1025, 53 L. R. A., 477, 82 Am. St. Rep., 902 ; Galyon v.

State Ex Rel. Sims v. Reagan

175 Tenn. 607 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1940

Peerless Construction Co. v. Bass, 158 Tenn., 518 , 14 S. W. (2d), 732 ; Insurance Co. v. Craig, 106 Tenn., 621 , 62 S. W., 155 ; Morley v. Power, 73 Tenn. (5 Lea), 691. In State ex rel v. … To like effect is the case of Cross v. Fisher, 132 Tenn., 31 , 177 S. W., 43 , Ann. Cas., 1916E, 1092.

City of Memphis v. Hood

208 Tenn. 319 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1961

Board of County Commissioners of Santa Fe County v. Slaughter, 49 N.M. 141 , 158 P.2d 859, 863 . … The property owner cites as authority for this proposition Carroll County Board of Education v. Caldwell, 178 Tenn. 671 , 162 S.W.2d 391 .

McClellan v. State

199 Tenn. 60 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1955

Putnam County Beer Board v. … See: Madison v. City of Maryville, 173 Tenn. 489 , 121 S. W. (2d) 540 ; State ex rel. Saperstein v. Bass, 177 Tenn. 609 , 152 S.

Phillips & Buttorff Mfg. Co. v. Campbell

93 Tenn. 469 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1894

Brown v. Brown, 2 Sneed, 437 . … v.

Holmes v. Jarrett Moon & Co.

54 Tenn. 506 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1872

Moreau v. Saffarans, 3 Sneed, 599 . … Ward v.

Bailey v. Tennessee Department of Employment Security

212 Tenn. 422 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1963

McCaleb v. American Insurance Company, 205 Tenn. 1, 8 , 325 S.W.2d 274 . See also Schindler v. Southern Coach Lines, Inc., 188 Tenn. 169, 175 , 217 S.W.2d 775 ; Poe v. … This finding by the Board of Review is in conformity with the holding of this Court in Special Products Company v.

Milne Chair Co. v. Hake

190 Tenn. 395 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1950

See Carter Carburetor Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 8 Cir., 140 F. (2d) 714, 718 and cases there cited. … However, the Oklahoma case of Board of Review v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp., 193 Okl. 36 , 141 P. (2d) 69 , 70 is much in point. Important is the fact that there is a dissenting opinion in the case.

Sowell v. Red

192 Tenn. 681 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1951

Putnam County Beer Board, 184 Tenn. 623, 627 , 201 S. W. (2d) 994 ; that the County Beer Board had a wide discretion in acting upon the revocation, Wright v. State, 171 Tenn. 628 , 106 S. … What the Board had authorized as a Board, could only be changed by the Board acting formally as a Board. Finney v. Garner, 110 Tenn. 67 , 71 S. W. 592 ; State ex rel. Milligan v. Jones, 143 Tenn. 575 , 224 S. W. 1041 .

Bargery v. Obion Grain Co.

785 S.W.2d 118 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1990

See also Stratton v. United Inter-Mountain Tel., 695 S.W.2d 947, 950 (Tenn.1985) and Lindsey v. Smith & Johnson, Inc., 601 S.W.2d 923, 925 (Tenn.1980). … In Cromwell General Contractor, Inc. v.

State Ex Rel. v. Trust Co.

168 Tenn. 546 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1935

In Browning v. … Numerous authorities cited on tbe briefs sustain this view, among them Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County v. State Bank, 64 Minn., 180 , 66 N.

Bob Fannon, Individually and as a City Councilman for the City of LaFollette v. City of LaFollotte

329 S.W.3d 418 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 21, 2010

Cobb v. Shelby Cnty. Bd. of Comm’rs, 771 S.W.2d 124, 126 (Tenn.1989); see also State ex rel. v. Brown, 159 Tenn. 591 , 21 S.W.2d 721, 723 (1929). … Similarly, in Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v.

Lambdin Funeral Service, Inc. v. Griffith

559 S.W.2d 791 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1978

Jones v. Trice, 210 Tenn. 535 , 360 S.W.2d 48 (1962); Froehlich v. Adair, 213 Kan. 357 , 516 P.2d 993 (1973); Munsell v. Ideal Food Stores, 208 Kan. 909 , 494 P.2d 1063 (1972); Hagan v. … Jones v. Trice, 210 Tenn. 535 , 360 S.W.2d 48 (1962); Crockett v. McClanahan, 109 Tenn. 517, 530 , 72 S.W. 950 , 953, 61 L.R.A. 914 (1903).

House v. Creveling

147 Tenn. 589 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1922

His other duties, in so far as this board is cohcerned, must be performed with the consent of tbe board, and no judicial function of tbe board is conferred upon this official, if it be conceded that tbe board of law examiners … We know, too, that the power to make rules is commonly given to boards and commissions. 12 C. J. 847; Woods v. State, supra.

King v. City of Bristol

156 Tenn. 643 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1928

Since the Board was legally constituted, its election or appointment of Purlow was valid. Head v. Elliott, 116 Tenn., 150, 154 . … Mossy Creek Bank v. Jefferson Co., 153 Tenn., 332 ; Smoky Mtn., etc., Land Co. v. Lattimore, 119 Tenn., 620, 626 ; Briscoe v. McMillan, 117 Tenn., 115 .

Stevenson v. Palmer

223 Tenn. 485 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 18, 1969

taken. *489 The courts have consistently upheld the broad grants of power to administrative bodies unless such power is deemed arbitrary and discriminatory. 1 Yokley, Zoning Law and Practice, Section 4-19, cites Huebner v. … Philadelphia Saving Fund Society, 127 Pa.Super. 28 , 192 A. 139 , and Taylor v.

Scruggs v. Bracy

619 S.W.2d 101 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1981

Thereafter, Disciplinary Counsel filed a petition before the Disciplinary Board, now Board of Professional Responsibility, to determine final discipline to be imposed upon Harry Scruggs, Jr. … A hearing panel was appointed by the Disciplinary Board to act upon the petition to determine final discipline, and it agreed to accept the plea for stated punishment.