Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstenn

6,256 results

1.00s

  • Sowell v. Red

    192 Tenn. 681 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1951

    Putnam County Beer Board, 184 Tenn. 623, 627 , 201 S. W. (2d) 994 ; that the County Beer Board had a wide discretion in acting upon the revocation, Wright v. State, 171 Tenn. 628 , 106 S. … What the Board had authorized as a Board, could only be changed by the Board acting formally as a Board. Finney v. Garner, 110 Tenn. 67 , 71 S. W. 592 ; State ex rel. Milligan v. Jones, 143 Tenn. 575 , 224 S. W. 1041 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Ragsdale v. Sandefur

    215 Tenn. 690 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1965

    Motlow v. Clark, 173 Tenn. 81 , 114 S.W.2d 800 (1938); State v. Wilbur, 101 Tenn. 211 , 47 S.W. 411 (1898); Lyvm v. Polk, 76 Tenn. 121 (1881); Peerless Const. Co. v. Bass, 158 Tenn. 518 , 14 S.W.2d 732 (1929); Taylor v. … In the case of Longinette v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Personal Finance Co.

    172 Tenn. 69 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1937

    Williams testified that he had no knowledge as to what would be a reasonable charge, and introduced as his witness Brown, manager of defendant, who gave the same testimony. … Counsel for plaintiff, relying upon a statement in Family Loan Company v. Hickerson, 168 Tenn., 36 , 73 S. W. (2d), 694 , 94 A. L.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wilhelm v. Krogers

    235 S.W.3d 122 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 17, 2007

    Brown determined that walking had caused the back and hip pain the Plaintiff experienced in 2004. … Layne v. Tenn. Consol.

    Cited 61 timesPublished
  • White v. Banks

    614 S.W.2d 331 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1981

    Such a transfer can be made only by the concurrent action of the superintendent and the board.” In McKenna v. Sumner County Board of Education, 574 S.W.2d 527 (Tenn.1978), we reviewed a number of teacher tenure cases. … McKenna v. Sumner County Board of Education, supra.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. James Beeler

    387 S.W.3d 511 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 15, 2012

    Brown, Judge ____________________ No. … Bryan v. United States, 524 U.S. 184, 191 (1998) (citing Spies v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Smoky Mountain Land, Lumber & Improvement Co. v. Lattimore

    119 Tenn. 620 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1907

    In Cowan v. Murch, 97 Tenn., 590 , 37 S. W., 393 , 34 L. R. … In Carroll v. Alsup, 107 Tenn., 260 , 64 S. W., 193 , two members of the State board of-equalization were present and heard the case.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State v. Morgan

    541 S.W.2d 385 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 9, 1976

    BROWN: Your Honor, I object to that. THE COURT: That would be competent, any prior felony convictions. MR. BROWN: I would doubt if he even knows what that means. THE COURT: If he has had them he would know. … BROWN: Your Honor, again I object. He doesn’t understand what a felony is— GENERAL FISHER: Well, let’s take a short recess and let Mr. Brown explain it to him, please the Court. THE COURT: No, I am not going to do that.

    Cited 145 timesPublished
  • Bragg v. Boyd

    193 Tenn. 507 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1952

    Beer Board v. Speck, 184 Tenn. 616 , 201 S. W. (2d) 991 . … Hicks v. Hicks, supra; Moore v. Chadwick, supra.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Manning v. Feidelson

    175 Tenn. 576 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1940

    Sheffy v. Mitchell, 142 Tenn., 48, 50 , 215 S. W., 403 ; Board of Directors v. Bodkin Bros., 108 Tenn., 700 , 69 S. W., 270 ; Baker v. Mitchell, 105 Tenn., 610 , 59 S. W., 137 ; White v. … Harmon v. Tyler, 112 Tenn., 8 , 83 S. W., 1041 ; Board of Directors v. Bodkin Bros., supra; Ridley v. Halliday, 106 Tenn., 607 , 61 8. W., 1025, 53 L. R. A., 477, 82 Am. St. Rep., 902 ; Galyon v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Sims v. Reagan

    175 Tenn. 607 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1940

    Peerless Construction Co. v. Bass, 158 Tenn., 518 , 14 S. W. (2d), 732 ; Insurance Co. v. Craig, 106 Tenn., 621 , 62 S. W., 155 ; Morley v. Power, 73 Tenn. (5 Lea), 691. In State ex rel v. … To like effect is the case of Cross v. Fisher, 132 Tenn., 31 , 177 S. W., 43 , Ann. Cas., 1916E, 1092.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Howard v. Bogart

    575 S.W.2d 281 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1979

    T.C.A., §§ 49-214(1), 49-224, 49-1313; Benson v. Hardin County, 173 Tenn. 246 , 116 S.W.2d 1025 (1938); State v. Yoakum, 201 Tenn. 180 , 297 S.W.2d 635 (1956); State v. … As we phrased it in Sanders v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Morton v. Hancock County

    161 Tenn. 324 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1930

    No member *327 of the County Board of Education shall be eligible for election as teacher, or any other position under the Board carrying with it any salary or compensation.” … In Collins v. Janey, 147 Tenn., 485 , it was held that a contract entered into by the Board of Education was not invalidated by the arbitrary refusal of the Chairman to execute the agreement when reduced to writing.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Hansard v. Sharp

    1 Thompson 73 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1850

    Wright v. Wilson, 2 Yerg. 294 . And the inadequacy must be gross and shocking, such as amounts to proof of fraud. Hardman v. Burge, 10 Yerg. 202 , 204; White v. Flora, 2 Tenn. 426, 430 ; Deaderick v. … Walkins, 8 Humph. 520 . (2) Wright v. Wilson, 2 Yerg. 294 ; citing Gwynne v. Heaton, Brown’s Chancery Cases 9; Herne v. Mettelers, 1 Vern. 465; Heathcote v. Paignon, 2 Brown’s Chancery Cases 167; Sugden on Vendors, 193.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • City of Memphis v. Hood

    208 Tenn. 319 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1961

    Board of County Commissioners of Santa Fe County v. Slaughter, 49 N.M. 141 , 158 P.2d 859, 863 . … The property owner cites as authority for this proposition Carroll County Board of Education v. Caldwell, 178 Tenn. 671 , 162 S.W.2d 391 .

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Sullins v. Farragut Tire & Battery Co.

    144 Tenn. 491 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1921

    This contention is based largely upon the case of Lynde v. … Among the cases cited is that of Lynde v. Browning, supra. We are unable to give our assent to the correctness of the proposition of law stated by Judge Higgius in his opinion in Lynde v. Browning.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • City of Knoxville v. State Ex Rel. Hayward

    175 Tenn. 159 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1939

    Board of Equalization v. Railroad, 148 Tenn., 676 , 257 S. W., 91 ; Railroad Co. v. Johnson, 114 Tenn. 632, 640 , 88 S. W., 169 ; Rogers v. Colville, 145 Tenn., 650 , 238 S. W., 80 ; Nashville, C. & St. L. R. R. v. … Board of Equalization v. Railroad, supra. The assignments of error made here challenging the facts as found by the trial judge must, under the above rule, be overruled.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Bargery v. Obion Grain Co.

    785 S.W.2d 118 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1990

    See also Stratton v. United Inter-Mountain Tel., 695 S.W.2d 947, 950 (Tenn.1985) and Lindsey v. Smith & Johnson, Inc., 601 S.W.2d 923, 925 (Tenn.1980). … In Cromwell General Contractor, Inc. v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Fecheimer-Keifer Co. v. Burton

    128 Tenn. 682 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1913

    , ch. 133). *684 The value of the stock sold in bulk, without compliance with the statute’s provisions, was $924.85, and that sum was paid in notes by the vendees, Cooper & Brown. … Robinson v. Stewart, 10 N. Y., 189, 196 ; Chatterton v. Mason, 86 Md., 236 , 37 Atl., 960 .

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Saunders v. Anderson

    746 S.W.2d 185 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1987

    v. … The Board and the Chancellor were justified in dismissing Plaintiff from her position as a teacher. As we stated in Cooper v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.