Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,777 results
1.12s
Estate of Carroll v. Commissioner
38 T.C. 868 · United States Tax Court · Sep 17, 1962
The chapel qualifies under the Canon Law of that church as a “public oratory,” which means that it is a place for worship by members of the public, generally. … Thus tbe Internal Revenue Service has recognized that where expenditures made by an individual were clearly for “the use” and the benefit of a qualified public charity, deductions therefor are allowable, even though there
Cited 9 timesPublished105 T.C. 234 · United States Tax Court · Sep 25, 1995
(b) Definitions and Special Rules. — For purposes of this section— (5) Qualified sale. — A sale of a magazine, paperback, or record is a qualified sale if— (A) at the time of sale, the taxpayer has a legal obligation to adjust … Second, it ‘must clearly reflect the income.’” Thor Power Tool Co. v. Commissioner, 439 U.S. 522, 532 (1979).
Cited 7 timesPublishedGiant Auto Parts, Ltd. v. Commissioner
13 T.C. 307 · United States Tax Court · Sep 15, 1949
Moreover, sections 8061 and 8064, which deal with the effect of a failure to maintain a register of debts and liabilities and the omission of the word “limited” from the partnership name, clearly suspend the immunity granted … In our opinion, the record falls far short of establishing the petitioner’s contention.
Cited 0 timesPublished54 T.C. 125 · United States Tax Court · Feb 2, 1970
Jackson’s right to alimony was highly doubtful, under Oklahoma law she clearly had an interest in the properties jointly acquired during coverture. … At the divorce hearing petitioner sought to establish that the value of the assets acquired during marriage was approximately $250,000.
Cited 38 timesPublishedUnited States Tax Court · Feb 3, 2026
of qualified research” (qualified supplies) … This testimony and documentation establish that all activities performed by GOMI employees qualify as qualified activities for a permitted purpose under section 41.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished40 T.C. 78 · United States Tax Court · Apr 19, 1963
Here it clearly appears the primary purpose of the grant was to further the education and research activities of the Markle scholar. … We therefore hold $3,600 of the grant qualifies as an exclusion under said section 117 in 1956.
Cited 14 timesPublishedSouthern Church of Universal Brotherhood Assembled, Inc. v. Commissioner
74 T.C. 1223 · United States Tax Court · Sep 10, 1980
We believe that the administrative record clearly shows that respondent acted in an impartial, unbiased manner in refusing petitioner’s requested tax exemption. … Our sole concern here is whether petitioner qualifies for exemption from Federal income taxation under sec. 501(c)(3).
Cited 12 timesPublished111 T.C. 273 · United States Tax Court · Nov 4, 1998
Facts The MEBA Plan The MEBA Plan was established as of August 1, 1950, pursuant to collective-bargaining agreements, and has been continued over the years by a series of collective-bargaining agreements. … On the contrary, it clearly emerges that the Congress entrusted the Treasury Department with the specific task of writing interested party regulations. The Treasury Department has done so.
Cited 38 timesPublishedBilar Tool & Die Corp. v. Commissioner
62 T.C. 213 · United States Tax Court · May 15, 1974
It is well established that expenses incurred in organizing and reorganizing a corporation are treated as nondeductible capital expenditures for tax purposes. … It is also established that expenses incurred in complete and partial liquidation of a corporation are deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses.
Cited 3 timesPublished45 T.C. 133 · United States Tax Court · Oct 28, 1965
As such, the arrangement herein clearly falls within the ambit of section 404(a) (5). Compare Champion Spark Plug Co., 30 T.C. 295 (1958), affirmed per curiam 266 F. 2d 347 (C.A. 6, 1959). … Similarly, even if petitioner and Aleñe were deemed to have established the agency account on behalf of Credit, Inc., 2 there is no evidence that this arrangement met the requirements of a qualified plan under section 401
Cited 3 timesPublished7 T.C. 648 · United States Tax Court · Aug 26, 1946
To these we think petitioner is clearly entitled. There is no warrant for the respondent’s regulation precluding the allowance of such deductions to qualified electing taxpayers. … (a) Election to Accrue Income. — In the case of any taxpayer computing income from installment sales under the method provided by section 44 (a), if such taxpayer establishes, in accordance with regulations prescribed by
Cited 10 timesPublished97 T.C. 51 · United States Tax Court · Jul 24, 1991
In order to provide rational rules for plan administrators, the committee believes it is necessary to establish guidelines for determining whether the exception to the spendthrift rules applies. … DEFINITIONS AND SPECIAL RULES. * * * * * * * (p) Qualified Domestic Relations Order Defined — For purposes of this subsection and section 401(a)(13)— (1) In general — (A) Qualified domestic relations order — The term “qualified
Cited 46 timesPublished79 T.C. 827 · United States Tax Court · Nov 18, 1982
The sale of the stock of Monson Truck Co. by petitioner was clearly a casual sale of personal property. … The rationale of the Pritchett and Collins cases is clearly to the contrary.
Cited 6 timesPublishedEstate of Kyle v. Commissioner
94 T.C. 829 · United States Tax Court · Jun 11, 1990
In the notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed the claimed deduction because the estate had not established that any amount had been or would be paid. … concluded: The historical development of the Texas homestead law, taken together with the express language of Texas’ short-lived dower statute, convinces us that the forced heirship provision of the Texas homestead law clearly
Cited 25 timesPublished61 T.C. 727 · United States Tax Court · Mar 13, 1974
On May 5, 1965, the corporation established a profit-sharing plan and trust (plan). … SEC. 401. qualified PENSION, PROFIT-SHARING, AND STOCK BONUS PLANS.
Cited 1 timesPublished133 T.C. 402 · United States Tax Court · Dec 21, 2009
Section 2502(c) clearly provides that gift tax is the liability of the donor: “The [gift] tax imposed by section 2501 shall be paid by the donor.” … The record establishes that the survivor’s trust held a 22.79-percent interest in Phoenix Partners, L.P.
Cited 25 timesPublished44 T.C. 598 · United States Tax Court · Jul 20, 1965
The sole issue for decision is whether the residuary trust established under the will of Wilhelmina L. Benjamin qualifies for the marital deduction. … The issue is whether the residuary trust established under the will of decedent qualifies for the marital deduction under section 2056 of the Internal Bevenue Code of 1954.
Cited 6 timesPublishedCitrus Valley Estates v. Commissioner
99 T.C. 379 · United States Tax Court · Sep 29, 1992
He was unable to conclude that the mortality assumption was clearly reasonable, but he determined that the assumption was “not clearly unreasonable either.” … Section 412 also establishes minimum funding standards for qualified pension plans. To accomplish this, section 412(b) requires that each qualified plan maintain a “funding standard account”.
Cited 18 timesPublishedRepublic Plaza Props. Pshp. v. Commissioner
107 T.C. 94 · United States Tax Court · Sep 16, 1996
Respondent concedes in her opening brief that If petitioner can establish that the absence of rental income during this [11.5-month] period [of zero rent] qualifies as a reasonable rent holiday under the Code, then the partnership … At least, petitioner has not established this relationship.
Cited 40 timesPublishedApplied Research Associates, Inc. and Affiliate v. Commissioner
143 T.C. No. 17 · United States Tax Court · Oct 9, 2014
the Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as he may deem necessary in order that the tax liability of the affiliated group, and of each of its members, may be computed, assessed, and collected in such manner as to clearly … Petitioner’s primary argument is that there is no guidance in the Code, the regulations, or other authority regarding the method of establishing the proper rate or rates of tax on consolidated taxable income where one
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna