Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.09s
World Airways, Inc. v. Commissioner
62 T.C. 786 · United States Tax Court · Sep 18, 1974
Trinity Construction Co. v. United States, 424 F. 2d 302, 305 (C.A. 5, 1970); see also Brown v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 193 (1934); Security Flour Mills Co. v. Commissioner, 321 U.S. 281 (1944). … Brown v. Helvering, supra at 201 .
Cited 37 timesPublishedAcuity, A Mut. Ins. Co., & Subsidiaries v. Comm'r
106 T.C.M. 233 · United States Tax Court · Sep 4, 2013
V. … V.
Cited 1 timesUnpublished25 T.C. 1154 · United States Tax Court · Jan 26, 1956
Brown, 7 T. C. 715 . … Maschaur v. Maschaur, 23 App. D. C. 87.
Cited 10 timesPublishedInternational Inv. Corp. v. Commissioner
11 T.C. 678 · United States Tax Court · Oct 25, 1948
It is well stated in Tri-Lakes Steamship Co. v. … In 1942 the United States Board of Tax Appeals decided the case of Stimson Mill Co., 46 B. T.
Cited 10 timesPublishedMorris Inv. Corp. v. Commissioner
5 T.C. 583 · United States Tax Court · Aug 10, 1945
Disney, Jvdge: The first and principal question here presented has already received no little attention in Lakeside Irrigation Co. v. Commissioner, 128 Fed. (2d) 418, affirming 41 B. T. … A. 892, where it is fully discussed; and in Reddington Co. v. Commissioner, 131 Fed. (2d) 1014, affirming the Board of Tax Appeals.
Cited 0 timesPublished35 T.C. 922 · United States Tax Court · Mar 14, 1961
Whitlock v. Alexander, supra; Goodman v. White, supra; Gover v. Malever, 187 N.C. 774 , 122 S.E. 841 . In Goodman v. … In further support of this contention, petitioners rely on Abbott v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedTrinidad Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner
22 T.C.M. 444 · United States Tax Court · Mar 29, 1963
The minutes of a board of directors' meeting at 2 P.M. on July 18, 1955, records the resignation of the old Cuckler and Brown *253 board members and officers and the election of a new Lacy board and officers. … Drybrough v. Commissioner.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished55 T.C. 840 · United States Tax Court · Feb 25, 1971
Marsack's Estate v. Commissioner, supra. … Burnet v. Logan, 283 U.S. 404, 412 (1931).
Cited 2 timesPublishedBurton-Sutton Oil Co. v. Commissioner
3 T.C. 1187 · United States Tax Court · Aug 4, 1944
The decision of the Commissioner and of the Board in this respect is approved. To the same effect are Jones’ Estate v. Commissioner, 127 Fed. (2d) 231, and Moynier v. Welch, 97 Fed. (2d) 471. … While the general rule is as above stated, the Board held in L. B.
Cited 12 timesPublished37 T.C. 999 · United States Tax Court · Feb 27, 1962
Penick, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent Penick v. Commissioner Docket No. 75658 United States Tax Court 37 T.C. 999 ; 1962 U.S. Tax Ct. … Both parties cite and discuss Commissioner v. Duberstein , 363 U.S. 278 .
Cited 0 timesPublished12 T.C.M. 1358 · United States Tax Court · Nov 30, 1953
Harvey v. Commissioner. Harvey v. Commissioner Docket No. 40991. United States Tax Court 1953 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 49 ; 12 T.C.M. (CCH) 1358 ; T.C.M. (RIA) 53376 ; November 30, 1953 *49 1. … Board and by that Board were delivered to petitioner for whom they were designated by Brown-Forman.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished66 T.C. 652 · United States Tax Court · Jun 30, 1976
Article V, section 4 of Pro-Mac’s bylaws provides that the salaries of corporate officers are to be fixed by the board of directors. … Substantially the same decision was made by Pro-Mac’s board of directors in a meeting held the same day.
Cited 81 timesPublishedKingfisher Cooperative Elevator Asso. v. Commissioner
84 T.C. 600 · United States Tax Court · Apr 2, 1985
Petitioner’s business activities were managed by its board of directors. The board was composed of five members who were elected to staggered 3-year terms by the members at annual membership meetings. … See Lamesa Cooperative Gin v. Commissioner, supra. In Lamesa Cooperative Gin v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEstate of Leavitt v. Commissioner
90 T.C. 206 · United States Tax Court · Feb 10, 1988
Brown v. Commissioner, 706 F.2d 755 (6th Cir. 1983), affg. T.C. Memo. 1981-608 ; Calcutt v. Commissioner, 84 T.C. 716, 720 (1985). The term “basis,” for purposes of section 1374(c), is defined in section 1012. 7 Borg v. … See also Brown v.
Cited 80 timesPublishedDunlap & Associates, Inc. v. Commissioner
47 T.C. 542 · United States Tax Court · Feb 28, 1967
See Reef Corporation v. … The case of Helvering v.
Cited 6 timesPublished6 T.C. 105 · United States Tax Court · Jan 24, 1946
See sec. 115 (g) . *354 Wilcox v. Commissioner , 137 Fed. (2d) 136 ; McGuire v. Commissioner , 84 Fed. (2d) 431 ; certiorari denied, 299 U.S. 591 ; Flanagan v. Helvering , 116 Fed. (2d) 937 ; Rheinstrom v. … A. 866 ; Robinson v. Commissioner , 69 Fed. (2d) 972 ; Brown v. Commissioner , 79 Fed. (2d) 73 ; W. & K. Holding Corporation , 38 B. T. A. 830 ; Bass v. Commissioner , 129 Fed. (2d) 300 ; Smith v.
Cited 1 timesPublished69 T.C.M. 1633 · United States Tax Court · Jan 11, 1995
BROWN HARRIS II, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Harris v. Commissioner Docket No. 11256-92 United States Tax Court T.C. Memo 1995-9 ; 1995 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 9 ; 69 T.C.M. … Brown Harris II, pro se. For respondent: Robert M. Fowler .
Cited 0 timesUnpublished18 T.C. 672 · United States Tax Court · Jun 26, 1952
Rinehart, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent Rinehart v. Commissioner Docket No. 30180 United States Tax Court 18 T.C. 672 ; 1952 U.S. Tax Ct. … The petitioner in , was not an employee of *674 Bache who paid a part of the amount which went to the seller when Brown acquired some stock, and the amount paid by Bache could not represent compensation to Brown.
Cited 7 timesPublished17 T.C. 620 · United States Tax Court · Oct 8, 1951
In Cape May Real Estate Co. v. … See Reading Co. v. Commissioner, 132 F. 2d 306, 310 , affirming a Memorandum Opinion of the Board of Tax Appeals (now this Court).
Cited 37 timesPublished113 T.C.M. 3916 · United States Tax Court · Feb 2, 2017
by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of their tax liabilities before payment.5 The Revenue Act of 1924 provided that “[t]here is hereby established a board to be known as the Board of Tax Appeals” and “[t]he Board shall … In 1926 Congress made various statutory changes with respect to the Board of Tax Appeals, but the statute continued to provide that the Board of Tax Appeals is “an independent agency in the Executive Branch of the Government
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna