Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstax

7,777 results

0.41s

  • Berry Trust v. Commissioner

    26 T.C. 344 · United States Tax Court · May 25, 1956

    The record clearly demonstrates that in the ordinary course of its business activities the corporation would have either collected or charged off as worthless all but 1.336 per cent of the accounts sold on February 1, 1942 … we think he has regulated beyond that intention of Congress; and we are of the opinion that the portion of the regulations, Regulations 112, section 35.736 (a)-l (5) (3), here in issue bears no reasonable relation to the clearly

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gold Seal Liquors, Inc. v. Commissioner

    28 T.C. 471 · United States Tax Court · May 28, 1957

    It urges that there are four factors which qualify Component Gold Seal for relief under section 722 (b) (4), and that it has established that, for those 2 years, a fair and just amount representing normal earnings to be used … The parties have stipulated that Acquiring Gold Seal qualifies as an acquiring corporation imder section 740 (a) (4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939; that Component Gold Seal and its subsidiary corporation, Famous, qualify

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Samis v. Commissioner

    76 T.C. 609 · United States Tax Court · Apr 20, 1981

    Petitioners have failed to establish that the structure is not properly classified as a “building.” … Certainly, if KF-IDS had itself constructed and operated the plant, it would clearly have to be treated as an integral and structural component of the entire apartment complex, and would not qualify for the investment credit

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Shedd v. Commissioner

    23 T.C. 41 · United States Tax Court · Oct 15, 1954

    Therefore, the interest of the surviving spouse was clearly terminable within the purview of section 812 (e) (1) (B) unless the gift over in default of appointment was void from the time of the decedent’s death and the surviving … Petitioner cites Haywards Estate, 57 Ariz. 51 , 110 P. 2d 956 , which adopts as controlling the following rule stated in 19 American Jurisprudence 575: The general rule is well established that whenever an estate is given

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Fujinon Optical, Inc. v. Commissioner

    76 T.C. 499 · United States Tax Court · Mar 31, 1981

    Thus, both the statute and the legislative history explaining it clearly indicate that all of the employees of a controlled group are to be considered, without limitation, for purposes of sections 401(a) and 410(b)(1). … This Court has already required aggregation under section 414(b) for purposes of testing the vesting requirements of a plan established by a 100-percent-owned subsidiary of a corporate parent.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Clapham v. Commissioner

    63 T.C. 505 · United States Tax Court · Jan 30, 1975

    Trisko, supra. 4 Stolk and Houlette do not establish a rule of law, but merely identify facts and circumstances deemed relevant in those cases. … Petitioners clearly complied with this requirement.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Catawba Industrial Rubber Co. v. Commissioner

    64 T.C. 1011 · United States Tax Court · Sep 9, 1975

    The issues for decision are: (1) Whether petitioner established a profit-sharing trust, qualified under section 401(a), I.R.C. 1954, 1 by April 30, 1972, the final day of its taxable year 1972; and (2) whether the contribution … While, in our opinion, section 401(a) clearly contemplates the existence of a trust within the employer’s taxable year in which deductions for contributions are claimed, the section does not specify what will qualify as a

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bailey v. Commissioner

    88 T.C. 1293 · United States Tax Court · May 18, 1987

    Grants received under social welfare programs that did not require recipients to establish individual need have not qualified under respondent’s rulings for tax exempt status under the general welfare doctrine. … Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426, 431 (1955), the Supreme Court held that the term “gross income” as used in the Internal Revenue Code, includes all “accessions to wealth, clearly realized, and over which the taxpayers have

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Dusha v. Commissioner

    82 T.C. 592 · United States Tax Court · Apr 9, 1984

    are clearly available to the defendant, and grant such immunity to plaintiff so that any information or documents requested if existing would not be used in criminal matters against the plaintiff in any criminal proceeding … Commissioner, supra, clearly demonstrates his contempt for his discovery obligations and his willful, bad-faith failure to comply with this Court’s order.

    Cited 50 timesPublished
  • Raffensperger v. Commissioner

    33 T.C. 1097 · United States Tax Court · Mar 31, 1960

    It is agreed chat petitioner’s salary qualifies for the exclusion unless the Club, which paid the salary, was an agency of the United States in 1953. … The Club was clearly under the supervision and control of the Army, subject to its regulations, and as such it was a nonappropriated sundry fund and an instrumentality or agency of the United States throughout the year 1958

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Trebotich v. Commissioner

    57 T.C. 326 · United States Tax Court · Dec 9, 1971

    Before discussing these questions, the possibility that the 1966 agreement established a qualified profit-sharing plan will be examined. … Clearly, if the employers merely accumulated the funds in reserve accounts established and controlled by them, the arrangement would not constitute the funding of a qualified plan. Reginald H.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Epstein v. Commissioner

    70 T.C. 439 · United States Tax Court · Jun 13, 1978

    The corporation established a pension plan for the benefit of certain qualified employees which became effective on February 1, 1965. … That case is, therefore, clearly distinguishable.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • McGahen v. Commissioner

    76 T.C. 468 · United States Tax Court · Mar 26, 1981

    Clearly, petitioner earned his wages in his individual capacity. Under the structure of the Basic Bible Church and by its bylaws and charter, petitioner could not be an agent of the church. … Thus, our discussion herein will relate only to the amounts qualifying for the deduction and not the entire salary for each year.

    Cited 122 timesPublished
  • Lincoln Electric Co. v. Commissioner

    17 T.C. 1600 · United States Tax Court · Mar 26, 1952

    Petitioner has properly assumed the burden of establishing the fact of reasonableness. … The record clearly establishes that petitioner’s incentive system materially contributed to increased productivity, enhanced earnings, reduced selling prices, avoided labor strife and work stoppages, and developed and retained

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • William Bryen Co. v. Commissioner

    89 T.C. 689 · United States Tax Court · Sep 29, 1987

    Plan and (2) the establishment of an excess funds account with respect to the W.B. Co. … Future litigation might be avoided by issuing regulations that more clearly define the terms “pension plan,” “money purchase pension plan,” and “target benefit pension plan.”

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Kueneman v. Commissioner

    68 T.C. 609 · United States Tax Court · Jul 26, 1977

    Also, the adoption of the Rodgers interpretation would lead to results which are capricious or clearly inconsistent with the legislative history. … Having so concluded, we now turn to the facts of this case to determine whether there was a transfer of all substantial rights, bearing in mind that the petitioners have the burden of establishing that their disposition satisfied

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Superior Coach of Florida, Inc. v. Commissioner

    80 T.C. 895 · United States Tax Court · May 16, 1983

    method as, in the opinion of the Secretary, does clearly reflect income” (emphasis added). … It is well established that sections 446(b) and 471 vest the Commissioner with broad authority in matters of inventory accounting and give him wide latitude to recompute income so as to clearly reflect income.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Howard v. Commissioner

    24 T.C. 792 · United States Tax Court · Jul 29, 1955

    The transaction in question would clearly qualify as a nontaxable exchange (to the extent of the exchange of stock for stock) on the latter theory, but would obviously not so qualify under the former. … We think, however, that the authorities have clearly established the applicable rule of law to be that the consideration for whatever stock is acquired by the transferee corporation in a transaction such as that before us

    Overruled by Reeves v. Commissioner, 71 T.C. 727 (1979)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Highland Merchandising Co. v. Commissioner

    18 T.C. 737 · United States Tax Court · Jul 8, 1952

    ; (4) it has failed to- establish what would constitute a fair and just amount representing normal earnings to be used as a constructive average base period net income. … The use of a method of accounting by the taxpayer and its acceptance by the Commissioner may be taken to indicate that it clearly reflects its taxable income for a particular period.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Talley v. Commissioner

    20 T.C. 715 · United States Tax Court · Jun 30, 1953

    employed in keeping the books of the taxpayer, or “if the method employed does not clearly reflect the income.” … The evidence clearly establishes that neither of those qualifying conditions existed here and we do not believe respondent seriously contends otherwise.

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.