Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersscotus

10,000+ results

2.47s

  • Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. Fox

    492 U.S. 469 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 29, 1989

    There is no doubt that the AFS “Tupperware parties” the students seek to hold “propose a commercial transaction,” Virginia Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U. … While these examples consist of speech for a profit, they do not consist of speech that proposes a commercial transaction, which is what defines commercial speech, see Virginia Pharmacy Board, 425 U.

    Cited 1,046 timesPublished
  • J. P. Stevens & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    404 U.S. 830 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 12, 1971

    Cited 2 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Franchise Tax Board of California v. Farmer Bros.

    540 U.S. 1178 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 23, 2004

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City Public Schools v. Dowell

    498 U.S. 237 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 15, 1991

    Dowell v. School Board of Oklahoma City Public Schools, 219 F. Supp. 427 (WD Okla.). … Under that interpretation of the word, a unitary school district is one that has met the mandate of Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U. S. 294 (1955), and Green v. New Kent County School Bd., 391 U. S. 430 (1968).

    Cited 388 timesPublished
  • Jensen v. Conrad

    470 U.S. 1052 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 18, 1985

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    303 U.S. 453 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 28, 1938

    National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U. S. 1, 38 . … Stafford v. Wallace, 258 U. S. 495, 516 ; Chicago Board of Trade v. Olsen, 262 U. S. 1, 33 .

    Cited 173 timesPublished
  • Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board

    315 U.S. 740 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 30, 1942

    S. 342, 357 ; Board of Railroad Comm’rs v. Great Northern Ry. Co., 281 U. … W. 791 ; State v. Ballard, 158 Wis. 251 , 148 N. W. 1090 ; State v. Board of State Canvassers, 159 Wis. 216 , 150 N. W. 542 ; State v. Lange Canning Co., 164 Wis. 228 , 157 N. W. 777 , 160 N. W. 57 ; State v.

    Cited 335 timesPublished
  • Bethlehem Steel Co. v. New York State Labor Relations Board

    330 U.S. 767 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 7, 1947

    Such was the situation in Allen-Bradley Local v. Board, 315 U. … Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line, 272 U. S. 605 ; compare Oregon-Washington Co. v. Washington, 270 U. S. 87 , with Parker v. Brown, 317 U. S. 341 ; cf. Mintz v. Baldwin, 289 U. S. 346 .

    Cited 276 timesPublished
  • Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz

    435 U.S. 78 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 1, 1978

    The Court of Appeals agreed, citing this Court’s opinion in Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U. S., at 573 .

    Cited 861 timesPublished
  • Washington, Virginia & Maryland Coach Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    301 U.S. 142 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 12, 1937

    The specifications of error addressed to other questions are answered by the decision of this court in National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., ante, p. 1. … Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United States, 298 U. S. 38 ; Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. United States, 298 U. S. 349, 368 . 6 Compare Crowell v. Benson, 285 U. S. 22 . 7 Florida v. United States, 292 U.

    Cited 89 timesPublished
  • Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of New York City

    350 U.S. 551 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 9, 1956

    Brown v. Walker, 161 U. S. 591, 610 . We have reaffirmed our faith in this principle recently in Quinn v. United States, 349 U. S. 155 . In Ullmann v. United States, 350 U. … Daniman v. Board, 348 U. S. 933 . See Daniman v. Board, 307 N. Y. 806 , 121 N.

    Cited 583 timesPublished
  • Adler v. Board of Ed. of City of New York

    342 U.S. 485 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 3, 1952

    Co. v. Turnipseed, 219 U. S. 35, at p. 42 . … Asbury Hospital v. Cass County, 326 U. S. 207, 213-216 ; Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdory, 325 U. S. 450, 460-462 ; Plymouth Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania, 232 U. S. 531, 546 .

    Overruled by Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY, 385 U.S. 589 (1966)Cited 294 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.

    301 U.S. 58 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 12, 1937

    The Board overruled the objections to its jurisdiction and the validity of the Act. … For the reasons stated in our opinion in National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 77 timesPublished
  • Yakima County Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Board of Commissioners

    446 U.S. 979 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 2, 1980

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Wooster Division of Borgwarner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 5, 1958

    Medo Photo Corp. v. Labor Board, 321 U. S. 678 . The “recognition” clause likewise does not come within the definition of mandatory bargaining. … Labor Board v. Darlington Veneer Co., 236 F. 2d 85 (C. A. 4th Cir.); Labor Board v. Corsicana Cotton Mills, 178 F. 2d 344 (C. A. 5th Cir.). Cf. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co. v. Labor Board, 213 F. 2d 374 (C. A. 7th Cir.).

    Cited 373 timesPublished
  • Universal Security Instruments, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    454 U.S. 965 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 2, 1981

    Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Plasterers' Local Union No. 79

    404 U.S. 116 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 6, 1971

    Until now, courts of appeals have uniformly upheld the Board’s position; see, e. g., New Orleans Typographical Union No. 17 v. NLRB, 368 F. 2d 755, 763 (CA5 1966), NLRB v. … In Lewis v. NLRB, 357 U. S. 10 (1958), the issue was whether the Board’s General Counsel was a “party” who could apply to the Board for the issuance of a subpoena.

    Cited 128 timesPublished
  • Board of Airport Commissioners v. Jews for Jesus, Inc.

    479 U.S. 812 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 6, 1986

    Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • First National Bank of Greeley v. Board of County Commissioners

    264 U.S. 450 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 7, 1924

    Plaintiff seeks to excuse its failure to apply to the County Board for an equalization by saying that this was a public duty of the Board and not a private remedy; and Greene v. Louisville & I. R. R. Co., 244 U. … McGregor v. Hogan, supra; Farncomb v. Denver, supra, p. 11; Stanley v. Supervisors of Albany, 121 U. S. 535 ; Petoskey Gas Co. v. Petoskey, 162 Mich. 447, 452 ; Township of Caledonia v.

    Cited 123 timesPublished
  • International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. National Labor Relations Board

    366 U.S. 731 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 5, 1961

    Case Co. v. Labor Board, 321 U. S. 332, 339 . In short, as we said in Brooks v. Labor Board, 348 U. … See Labor Board v. Perfect Circle Co., 162 F. 2d 566 ; Labor Board v. Illinois Tool Works, 153 F. 2d 811 ; McQuay-Norris Mfg. Co. v. Labor Board, 116 F. 2d 748 ; and cf. Labor Board v.

    Cited 284 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.