Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.47s
Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. Fox
492 U.S. 469 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 29, 1989
There is no doubt that the AFS “Tupperware parties” the students seek to hold “propose a commercial transaction,” Virginia Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U. … While these examples consist of speech for a profit, they do not consist of speech that proposes a commercial transaction, which is what defines commercial speech, see Virginia Pharmacy Board, 425 U.
Cited 1,046 timesPublishedJ. P. Stevens & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
404 U.S. 830 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 12, 1971
Cited 2 timesPublishedNo opinion textFranchise Tax Board of California v. Farmer Bros.
540 U.S. 1178 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 23, 2004
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Ed. of Oklahoma City Public Schools v. Dowell
498 U.S. 237 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 15, 1991
Dowell v. School Board of Oklahoma City Public Schools, 219 F. Supp. 427 (WD Okla.). … Under that interpretation of the word, a unitary school district is one that has met the mandate of Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U. S. 294 (1955), and Green v. New Kent County School Bd., 391 U. S. 430 (1968).
Cited 388 timesPublished470 U.S. 1052 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 18, 1985
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textSanta Cruz Fruit Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
303 U.S. 453 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 28, 1938
National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U. S. 1, 38 . … Stafford v. Wallace, 258 U. S. 495, 516 ; Chicago Board of Trade v. Olsen, 262 U. S. 1, 33 .
Cited 173 timesPublishedAllen-Bradley Local No. 1111 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board
315 U.S. 740 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 30, 1942
S. 342, 357 ; Board of Railroad Comm’rs v. Great Northern Ry. Co., 281 U. … W. 791 ; State v. Ballard, 158 Wis. 251 , 148 N. W. 1090 ; State v. Board of State Canvassers, 159 Wis. 216 , 150 N. W. 542 ; State v. Lange Canning Co., 164 Wis. 228 , 157 N. W. 777 , 160 N. W. 57 ; State v.
Cited 335 timesPublishedBethlehem Steel Co. v. New York State Labor Relations Board
330 U.S. 767 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 7, 1947
Such was the situation in Allen-Bradley Local v. Board, 315 U. … Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line, 272 U. S. 605 ; compare Oregon-Washington Co. v. Washington, 270 U. S. 87 , with Parker v. Brown, 317 U. S. 341 ; cf. Mintz v. Baldwin, 289 U. S. 346 .
Cited 276 timesPublishedBoard of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz
435 U.S. 78 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 1, 1978
The Court of Appeals agreed, citing this Court’s opinion in Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U. S., at 573 .
Cited 861 timesPublishedWashington, Virginia & Maryland Coach Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
301 U.S. 142 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 12, 1937
The specifications of error addressed to other questions are answered by the decision of this court in National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., ante, p. 1. … Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United States, 298 U. S. 38 ; Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. United States, 298 U. S. 349, 368 . 6 Compare Crowell v. Benson, 285 U. S. 22 . 7 Florida v. United States, 292 U.
Cited 89 timesPublishedSlochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of New York City
350 U.S. 551 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 9, 1956
Brown v. Walker, 161 U. S. 591, 610 . We have reaffirmed our faith in this principle recently in Quinn v. United States, 349 U. S. 155 . In Ullmann v. United States, 350 U. … Daniman v. Board, 348 U. S. 933 . See Daniman v. Board, 307 N. Y. 806 , 121 N.
Cited 583 timesPublishedAdler v. Board of Ed. of City of New York
342 U.S. 485 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 3, 1952
Co. v. Turnipseed, 219 U. S. 35, at p. 42 . … Asbury Hospital v. Cass County, 326 U. S. 207, 213-216 ; Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdory, 325 U. S. 450, 460-462 ; Plymouth Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania, 232 U. S. 531, 546 .
Overruled by Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY, 385 U.S. 589 (1966)Cited 294 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.
301 U.S. 58 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 12, 1937
The Board overruled the objections to its jurisdiction and the validity of the Act. … For the reasons stated in our opinion in National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 77 timesPublishedYakima County Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Board of Commissioners
446 U.S. 979 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 2, 1980
Cited 7 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Wooster Division of Borgwarner Corp.
356 U.S. 342 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 5, 1958
Medo Photo Corp. v. Labor Board, 321 U. S. 678 . The “recognition” clause likewise does not come within the definition of mandatory bargaining. … Labor Board v. Darlington Veneer Co., 236 F. 2d 85 (C. A. 4th Cir.); Labor Board v. Corsicana Cotton Mills, 178 F. 2d 344 (C. A. 5th Cir.). Cf. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co. v. Labor Board, 213 F. 2d 374 (C. A. 7th Cir.).
Cited 373 timesPublishedUniversal Security Instruments, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
454 U.S. 965 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 2, 1981
Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion textNational Labor Relations Board v. Plasterers' Local Union No. 79
404 U.S. 116 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 6, 1971
Until now, courts of appeals have uniformly upheld the Board’s position; see, e. g., New Orleans Typographical Union No. 17 v. NLRB, 368 F. 2d 755, 763 (CA5 1966), NLRB v. … In Lewis v. NLRB, 357 U. S. 10 (1958), the issue was whether the Board’s General Counsel was a “party” who could apply to the Board for the issuance of a subpoena.
Cited 128 timesPublishedBoard of Airport Commissioners v. Jews for Jesus, Inc.
479 U.S. 812 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 6, 1986
Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion textFirst National Bank of Greeley v. Board of County Commissioners
264 U.S. 450 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 7, 1924
Plaintiff seeks to excuse its failure to apply to the County Board for an equalization by saying that this was a public duty of the Board and not a private remedy; and Greene v. Louisville & I. R. R. Co., 244 U. … McGregor v. Hogan, supra; Farncomb v. Denver, supra, p. 11; Stanley v. Supervisors of Albany, 121 U. S. 535 ; Petoskey Gas Co. v. Petoskey, 162 Mich. 447, 452 ; Township of Caledonia v.
Cited 123 timesPublishedInternational Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. National Labor Relations Board
366 U.S. 731 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 5, 1961
Case Co. v. Labor Board, 321 U. S. 332, 339 . In short, as we said in Brooks v. Labor Board, 348 U. … See Labor Board v. Perfect Circle Co., 162 F. 2d 566 ; Labor Board v. Illinois Tool Works, 153 F. 2d 811 ; McQuay-Norris Mfg. Co. v. Labor Board, 116 F. 2d 748 ; and cf. Labor Board v.
Cited 284 timesPublished
Ask Donna