Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.17s
Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents
527 U.S. 1067 · Supreme Court of the United States · Sep 28, 1999
Cited 0 timesPublishedKimel v. Florida Board of Regents
527 U.S. 1067 · Supreme Court of the United States · Sep 28, 1999
Cited 0 timesPublishedBeth Israel Hospital v. National Labor Relations Board
437 U.S. 483 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 22, 1978
The authority of the Board to modify its construction of the Act in light of its cumulative experience is, of course, clear. NLRB v. Iron Workers, 434 U. S., at 351 ; NLRB v. Weingarten, Inc., 420 U. S., at 265-267 . … John’s Hospital & School of Nursing, Inc. v.
Cited 292 timesPublishedWalker v. Board of County Commissioners
350 U.S. 902 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 21, 1955
Cited 1 timesPublishedOpong-Mensah v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
568 U.S. 811 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 1, 2012
Cited 0 timesPublishedSellers v. Oklahoma Pardon & Parole Board
525 U.S. 1131 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 3, 1999
Cited 0 timesPublishedBreen v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16
396 U.S. 460 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 28, 1970
Oestereich v. Selective Service Bd., 393 U. S. 233, 235, 238 (1968). During the pendency of that appeal the Appeal Board upheld the reclassification and the local board then ordered Breen to report for induction. … IV), authorizes delinquency inductions must be rejected for the reasons set forth in Oestereich, supra, at 236-237 , and in Gutknecht v. United States, ante, at 302.
Cited 158 timesPublishedReno v. Bossier Parish School Board
527 U.S. 1061 · Supreme Court of the United States · Sep 10, 1999
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Stowe Spinning Co.
336 U.S. 226 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 28, 1949
Republic Aviation Corp. v. Labor Board, supra, 324 U. S. at 798 . … See, for example, Berkshire Knitting Mills v. Labor Board, 139 F. 2d 134 (company union given use of hall denied to outside union); Labor Board v.
Cited 51 timesPublishedDetroit Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
440 U.S. 301 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 5, 1979
Utility Workers v. Consolidated Edison Co., 309 U. S. 261, 269 . Effective sanctions at the Board level are similarly problematic. … We are mindful that the Board is granted broad discretion in devising remedies to undo the effects of violations of the Act, NLRB v. Seven-Up Bottling Co., 344 U. S. 344, 346 ; Fibreboard Corp. v. NLRB, 379 U.
Cited 279 timesPublishedCapital Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
347 U.S. 501 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 17, 1954
The National Labor Relations Act is a law “regulating commerce” (Labor Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U. S. 1 ); and here, as in American Federation of Labor v. Watson, 327 U. … See Public Utilities *505 Commission v. Gas Co., 317 U. S. 456, 468-470 ; Bowles v. Willingham, 321 U. S. 503, 510-511 . Cf. American Federation of Labor v. Watson, supra, at 593-595 .
Cited 115 timesPublishedCrawford v. Board of Ed. of Los Angeles
458 U.S. 527 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 30, 1982
Brown v. Califano, 201 U. S. App. D. … In Brown v.
Cited 115 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corp.
368 U.S. 318 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 18, 1961
Marshall Field & Co. v. Labor Board, 318 U. S. 253 ; May Department Stores Co. v. Labor Board, 326 U. S. 376, 386, n. 5 ; Labor Board v. Cheney California Lumber Co., supra; Labor Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Co., 344 U. … See Labor Board v.
Cited 118 timesPublishedReno v. Bossier Parish School Board
527 U.S. 1033 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 24, 1999
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Pool Manufacturing Co.
339 U.S. 577 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 16, 1950
Compare Labor Board v. American Creosoting Co., 139 F. 2d 193 (C. A. 6th Cir. 1943); Labor Board v. Electric Vacuum Cleaner Co., 315 U. S. 685, 697-698 (1942). … The employer, who could have obtained review of the Board order when it was entered, § 10 (f), is hardly in a position to object. Labor Board v. Todd Co., 173 F. 2d 705 (C. A. 2d Cir. 1949); Labor Board v.
Cited 34 timesPublishedInternational Typographical Union v. National Labor Relations Board
344 U.S. 816 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 13, 1952
Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion textReno v. Bossier Parish School Board
517 U.S. 1154 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 22, 1996
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Savair Manufacturing Co.
414 U.S. 270 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 17, 1973
See, e. g., NLRB v. … See also Collins & Aikman Corp. v.
Cited 164 timesPublishedWard v. Board of Examiners of Engineers, Architects & Surveyors
429 U.S. 801 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 4, 1976
Cited 23 timesPublishedNo opinion textUniversal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
340 U.S. 474 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 26, 1951
See also Millis and Brown, From the Wagner Act to Taft-Hartley, 66-75. 7 Wilson & Co. v. Labor Board, 126 F. 2d 114, 117 . 8 In Labor Board v. … Labor Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc., 322 U. S. 111 ; Republic Aviation Corp. v. Labor Board and Labor Board v. Le Tourneau Co., 324 U. S. 793 .
Cited 7,674 timesPublished
Ask Donna