Case law

Brown v. Ind. Bd. of Law Examiners

84 U.S.L.W. 3654 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 31, 2016

Brown v. United States

356 U.S. 148 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 28, 1958

Fitzpatrick v. United States, 178 U. S. 304, 315 ; and see Reagan v. United States, 157 U. S. 301, 304-305 . … Walder v. United States, 347 U. S. 62, 65 .

Brown v. United States

113 U.S. 568 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 2, 1885

In Edwards v. … But if there had been any irregularity or defect in the report of the board it was the duty of Brown to object to it without unreasonable delay.

Chrysler Corp. v. Brown

441 U.S. 281 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 18, 1979

Brown) (expressing concern that 1864 revenue provisions would allow “every little petty officer” to investigate the affairs of private citizens). … Brown), 6549-6550 (Rep. Moss) (1958). It is clear from Congressman Moss’ comments that § 1905 is one of those statutes. 104 Cong. Rec. 6549-6550 (1958).

Taylor & Quarles v. Brown

9 U.S. 234 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 18, 1809

The opinions delivered by the judges of-appeals of Virginia in the case of Johnson v. … But the case of Johnson v. Buffington was much stronger than this.

Brown v. United States

276 U.S. 134 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 20, 1928

In Hale v. Henkel, 201 U. … The question is ruled, not by Hale v. Henkel , but by Consolidated Rendering Co. v. Vermont, 207 U. S. 541, 553-554 , and Wheeler v. United States, 226 U. S. 478, 482-483, 489 .

Brown v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

481 U.S. 1049 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 18, 1987

Reading Co. v. Brown

391 U.S. 471 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 3, 1968

The same day, the District Court appointed a receiver, Francis Shunk Brown, a respondent here. … Co. v. Bloom, 164 U. S. 636 ; Bereth v. Sparks, 51 F. 2d 441 ; §77 (n), 11 U. S.

Brown v. New York

365 U.S. 821 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 20, 1961

United States v. Brown

348 U.S. 110 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 6, 1954

S. 951 , because of doubts as to whether Brooks v. United States, 337 U. S. 49 , or Feres v. United States, 340 U. S. 135 , controlled this case. … The Court held in Johansen v. United States, 343 U.

Railroad Co. v. Brown

84 U.S. 445 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 17, 1873

Indeed, there is nothing to show that Catharine Brown knew of the. ditíiculties into which the original company had fallen, nor of the part performed by the lessees and receiver in operating the road.

Brown v. Van Braam

3 U.S. 344 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 13, 1797

3 U.S. 344 3 Dall. 344 1 L.Ed. 629 Brown v. Van Braam. August Term, 1797 1 Error from the Circuit Court, for the District of Rhode Island. … Plaintiff having, likewise, suggested the death of Francis 'prayed judgment against John Brown, the surviving Defendant.'

McCormick & Co. v. Brown

286 U.S. 131 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 16, 1932

State v. Muncey, 28 W. Va. 494 ; State v. Good, 56 W. Va. 215 ; 49 S. E. 121 ; State v. Durr, 69 W. Va. 251 ; 71 S. E. 767 ; State v. Henry, 74 W. Va. 72; 81 S. E. 569 . … Eberle v. Michigan, supra; Kidd v. Pearson, 128 U. S. 1, 19 ; Rippey v. Texas, 193 U. S. 504, 509 ; Crane v. Campbell, 245 U. S. 304, 307 ; Vigliotti v. Pennsylvania, supra.

Brown v. North Carolina

434 U.S. 998 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 12, 1977

United States v. Brown

381 U.S. 437 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 11, 1965

Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U. S. 232, 246 . … The Court’s opinion in Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 367 U.

Urquhart, Sheriff, v. Brown

205 U.S. 179 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 18, 1907

S. 516 ; New York v. Eno, 155 U. S. 89 ; In re Wood, 140 U. S. 278 ; In re Frederich, 149 U. S. 70 ; Pepke v. Cronan, 155 U. S. 100 ; In re Chapman, 156 U. S. 211 ; Whitten v. Tomlinson, 160 U. S. 231 ; Baker v. … S. 284 ; Tinsley v. Anderson, 171 U. S. 101, 104 ; Markuson v. Boucher, 175 U. S. 184 ; Minnesota v. Brundage, 180 U. S. 499 ; Riggins v. United States, 199 U. S. 547 ; In re Lincoln, 202 U. S. 178 .

Texas Co. v. Brown

258 U.S. 466 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 24, 1922

This decision is in line with the previous cases of Woodruff v. Parham, 8 Wall. 123, 140 , and Brown v. Houston, 114 U. S. 622, 632-634 ; and it was pointed out that their authority was not overruled by Leisy v. … Brown v. Houston , and American Steel & Wire Co. v. Speed, supra, sustain the power of a State to impose property taxes upon goods brought from another State, after they have come to rest in the taxing State.

Turner v. Brown

516 U.S. 997 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 27, 1995

Brown v. Van Braam

3 U.S. 344 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 13, 1797

Brown v. Allen

444 U.S. 1063 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 19, 1980

Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Secretary of Navy v. Huff, ante, p. 453.