Case law

DeVane v. Brown

559 U.S. 1017 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 22, 2010

Brown v. Georgia

560 U.S. 908 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 17, 2010

Koch v. Brown

559 U.S. 949 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 22, 2010

Brown v. Kelley

559 U.S. 1088 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 19, 2010

S&E Contractors, Inc. v. United States

406 U.S. 1 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 24, 1972

Kihlberg v. United States, 97 U. S., at 402 . Later came the present boards of contract appeals. Boards of contract appeals within the respective agencies today are common. … For other aspects of exhaustion of administrative review of decisions from boards of contract appeals, see United States v. Moorman, 338 U. S. 457 ; United States v. Grace & Sons, 384 U. S. 424 ; United States v.

Brown v. Hathaway

559 U.S. 1051 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 5, 2010

Brown v. California

559 U.S. 996 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 8, 2010

Brown v. Illinois

559 U.S. 979 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 1, 2010

Brown v. Williams

522 U.S. 1 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 20, 1997

Brown v. Brown, 513 U. S. 1040 (1994). Undeterred by this action, petitioner has continued filing frivolous petitions with this Court. … We enter this order barring prospective in forma pauperis filings by petitioner for the reasons discussed in Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Texas v. Brown

335 U.S. 855 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 25, 1948

Brown v. New Jersey

175 U.S. 172 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 20, 1899

Louisiana v. Pilsbury, 105 U. S. 278, 294 ; Hallinger v. Devis, 146 U. S. 314, 319 ; Forsyth v. Hammond, 166 U. S. 506 . … Barron v. Baltimore, 7 Pet. 243 ; Fox v. Ohio, 5 How. 410 ; Twitchell v. Commonwealth, 7 Wall. 321 ; United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542, 552 ; Spies v. Illinois, 123 U. S. 131 ; In re Sawyer, 124 U.

Brown v. United States

12 U.S. 110 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 18, 1814

The property was claimed by Armitz Brown, under the purchase made in the preceding November. The district court dismissed the libel. … The cargo of the Emulous having been legally acquired and put on board the vessel, having been detained by an embargo, not intended to act on foreign property, the vessel having sailed before the war, from Savannah, under

Brown v. United States

150 U.S. 93 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 6, 1893

Ev. § 94; State v. Dean, 13 Iredell, 63; Patton v. State, 6 Ohio St. 467 ; State v. Thibeau , 30 Vermont, 100; State v. Larkin, 49 N. H. 39; Heine v. Commonwealth, 91 Penn. St. 145 ; Davis v. State, 9 Tex. App. 363.” … The same proposition is stated 'in the following authorities: People v. Davis, 56 N. Y. 95, 103 ; New York Guaranty & Indemnity Co. v. Gleason, 78 N. Y. 503 ; People v. McQuade, 110 N. Y. 284, 307 ; also Wharton, Grim.

Brown v. United States

359 U.S. 41 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 20, 1959

Brown v. Walker, 161 U. S. 591 (1896). „The context in which the doctrine originated and the history of its reaffirmance through the years have been so recently re-examined by this Court in Ullman v. … Suffice it to repeat .that Brown v. Walker has become “part of our constitutional fabric.” 350 U. S., at 438 .

Henderson v. Brown

519 U.S. 886 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 7, 1996

Brown v. Ind. Bd. of Law Examiners

84 U.S.L.W. 3654 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 31, 2016

Brown v. United States

159 U.S. 100 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 3, 1895

Justice Jackson in Brown v. United States, 150 U. S. 93 . At a second trial Brown was again found guilty on each count. … Justice Brown dissented.

United States v. Brown

333 U.S. 18 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 8, 1948

As was said in United States v. Gaskin, 320 U. S. 527, 530 , the canon “does not require distortion or nullification of the evident meaning and purpose of the legislation.” … United States v. Raynor, 302 U. S. 540, 552 ; United States v. Giles, 300 U. S. 41, 48 ; Gooch v. United States, 297 U. S. 124, 128 ; United States v. Corbett, 215 U. S. 233, 242 .

Brown v. United States

113 U.S. 568 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 2, 1885

In Edwards v. … But if there had been any irregularity or defect in the report of the board it was the duty of Brown to object to it without unreasonable delay.

Chrysler Corp. v. Brown

441 U.S. 281 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 18, 1979

Brown) (expressing concern that 1864 revenue provisions would allow “every little petty officer” to investigate the affairs of private citizens). … Brown), 6549-6550 (Rep. Moss) (1958). It is clear from Congressman Moss’ comments that § 1905 is one of those statutes. 104 Cong. Rec. 6549-6550 (1958).