Case law

Nichol v. Arin Intermediate Unit 28

268 F. Supp. 2d 536 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 2003

Tinker v. Des Moines School Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 506 , 89 S.Ct. 733 , 21 L.Ed.2d 731 (1969), quoted in Brown v. Armenti, 247 F.3d 69, 74 (3d Cir.2001). … Board of County Comm’rs v. Umbehr, 518 U.S. 668, 677 [, 116 S.Ct. 2342 , 135 L.Ed.2d 843 ] (1996). Swartzwelder v. McNeilly, 297 F.3d 228, 235 (3d Cir.2002) (parallel and certain other citations omitted). 1.

United States v. Jones

430 F. Supp. 219 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1977

In Brown v. … Under Brown v.

Sewickley Valley Hospital v. Leavitt

567 F. Supp. 2d 761 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 19, 2008

board or management team continues to exist in the new board or management team, no real change of control has occurred. … Ctr. v.

Mroz v. Dravo Corporation

293 F. Supp. 499 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 15, 1968

Certain seamen were painting the kitchen of the Freedom; they ate their meals on board and some slept on board. The plaintiff cooked and performed maid service; she worked for 17 days (T., p. 17). … From May 26, 1965, when plaintiff was injured on board the Freedom to the date, of trial, she lost wages in excess of $18,000. 7 . Cf. Gooden v.

In Re Dreyfus Mutual Funds Fee Litigation

428 F. Supp. 2d 342 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2005

(citing Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100 , 111 (2d Cir.1981)). In addition, plaintiffs have alleged that the board of directors were neither independent or conscientious. See Krinsk v. … boards.

Arcon Development Corp. v. United States

409 F. Supp. 671 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 1976

Cleveland v. Salwen, et al., 292 Pa. 427 , 141 A. 155 (1928); Brown v. Brown, 164 Pa.Super. 350 , 64 A.2d 506 (1948). … Lynch v. Versailles *674 Fuel Gas Company, 165 Pa. 518 , 30 A. 984 (1895); Barraclough, et ux. v. The Atlantic Refining Company, 230 Pa.Super. 276 , 326 A.2d 477 (1975).

Miller v. Indiana Hospital

562 F. Supp. 1259 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 27, 1983

See *1272 Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). 30 Furthermore, we question whether Dr. Muller’s activities have a substantial effect on interstate commerce as required by the Sherman Act. … Container Corp., 393 U.S. 333, 337 [ 89 S.Ct. 510, 512 , 21 L.Ed.2d 526 ] (1969); United States v. National Assn. of Real Estate Boards, 339 U.S. 485, 489 [ 70 S.Ct. 711, 714 , 94 L.Ed. 1007 ] (1950); United States v.

United States ex rel. Clouthier v. Maroney

238 F. Supp. 161 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 1964

Clouthier v. … Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 460, 465 , 79 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1952); Schlette v. People of the State of California, 9 Cir., 284 F.2d 827 , cert. denied 366 U.S. 940 , 81 S.Ct. 1664 , 6 L. Ed.2d 852 .

Brownsville Golden Age Nursing Home, Inc. v. Wells

665 F. Supp. 419 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 4, 1987

However, on appeal the Commonwealth Court reversed the decision of the Board, finding it to be wholly arbitrary and without support in the record, and ordered immediate revocation of plaintiff’s license. Commonwealth v. … The Commonwealth Court reversed the decision of the Board and ordered the revocation of plaintiff’s license.

Local 4076, United Steelworkers v. United Steelworkers

338 F. Supp. 1154 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 1972

Board “whenever necessary”. … In Vaca v.

Germain Lumber Co. v. United States

56 F. Supp. 1001 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1944

V. … Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States, 76 Ct.Cl. 154 ; New York Continental Jewell Filtration v. United States, 55 Ct.Cl. 288 ; Bethlehem Steel Co. v. United States, 75 Ct.Cl. 845 .

Lucas v. Morton

358 F. Supp. 900 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 15, 1973

See McKart v. United States, 395 U.S. 185, 192 , 89 S.Ct. 1657 , 23 L.Ed.2d 194 (1969); Aircraft and Diesel Corp. v. Hirsch, 331 U.S. 752 , 67 S.Ct. 1493 , 91 L.Ed. 1796 (1947). … For an analogous fact situation which arose under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, see Lance Roofing Co. v.

Coleman v. Caplan

16 F. Supp. 760 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1936

In Pender v. Chatham Phenix National Bank & Trust Co., 58 F.(2d) 968, 970 . … See, also, Brown Shoe Co. v. Carns, 65 F.(2d) 294 (C.C.A.8); Irving Trust Co. v. Textile Banking Co., 3 F.Supp. 816 (D.C.S.D.N.Y.); and Cunningham, Trustee v.

ERIE COUNTY RETIREES v. County of Erie, Penn.

91 F. Supp. 2d 860 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1999

Due to the dramatic increase in the cost of health insurance which ensued over the years, the County Employees’ Retirement-Board (hereinafter, the “Board” or the “Retirement Board”) later re-evaluated the extent to which … See, e.g., Robinson v.

Armour v. Gradler

448 F. Supp. 741 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1978

In Kermarec v. … Feige v.

Neel v. Pippy

247 F. Supp. 2d 707 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 2003

Thompson, 478 U.S. 804 , 106 S.Ct. 3229 , 92 L.Ed.2d 650 (1986), the United States Supreme Court recognized the “litigation-provoking problem” created by certain language in Franchise Tax Board v. … Merrell Dow, 106 S.Ct. at 3232 (quoting Franchise Tax Board, 103 S.Ct. at 2846 ).

Elliott v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

166 F. Supp. 731 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 1957

Plaintiff boarded defendant’s motor vessel “Vesta” as master on February 3, 1954 at 7:00 a. m. The vessel was operating on the navigable rivers in the Pittsburgh area. … Co. v. Turner, 6 Cir., 269 F. 334 , at page 342, applies. Also Walker v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co., 2 Cir., 193 F.2d 772 .

Magenau v. Ætna Freight Lines, Inc.

161 F. Supp. 875 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 27, 1957

Schroyer also complained of brake trouble to one Herbert Brown in the tavern and offered him $25 if Brown would ride along with Schroyer to his destination. Brown refused. … Brown and Jones as to the conversation between Schroyer, the driver, and other persons at the Jones Tavern.

Obenchain Corp. v. Corporacion Nacionale de Inversiones

708 F. Supp. 695 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1989

PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiffs Complaint consists of 4 counts: Count I v. CONADI for breach of contract and fraud; Count II v. Fundiciones for breach of contract; Count III v. … Furthermore the Board’s resolution approves lending the full sum described but does not mandate it.

In re George Walter & Sons, Inc.

8 F.2d 267 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 1925

Christmas v. Russell, 14 Wall. (81 U. S.) 69, 84 ( 20 L. Ed. 762 ). Mr. Justice Gray, of our own Circuit Court of Appeals, has announced the same rule in Smedley v. Speckman, 157 F. 815 , 85 C. C. A. 179 . … Further, the Butler Board of Commerce is appealing to a court of equity to charge upon this fund such sum for services of the Butler Board of Commerce as the fund ought in equity and good conscience to bear.