Case law

Papercraft Corp. v. Procter & Gamble Co.

439 F. Supp. 1060 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 1977

Two of the directors also serve on the 17-person board of directors of The Procter & Gamble Company. … The meetings of the board of directors of the subsidiary are separate and distinct from the meetings of the board of the parent corporation.

Pennsylvania Chocolate Co. v. Lewellyn

27 F.2d 762 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 1928

A. 313; Durabilt Steel Locker Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 B. T. A. 239, and other eases. … A. 1062 ; Leland Stave Co. v. Commissioner, 6 B. T. A. 882, and other cases.

Jones v. Baskin, Flaherty, Elliot and Mannino, PC

670 F. Supp. 597 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 1987

He further alleges that BFEM, a number of BFEM attorneys (Baskin, Baum, Brown, Donne, Fiorito, Flaherty, Goldston, Lewis, Ponton and Wittlin), a former BFEM attorney (Young) and BFEM’s accountants, Swartz, Albanesi, Izenson … Progress Pattern Co., 217 F.2d 701, 704 (6th Cir.1954) (one-eighth shareholder, vice-president, director and chairman of board may be employee within purview of FSLA).

VIM, INC. v. Somerset Hotel Ass'n

19 F. Supp. 2d 422 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 1998

A majority of the board found this evidence sufficient to sustain the plaintiffs burden and granted the special height exception. Yet, one of the four board members dissented: MRS. … Okland Oil Co. v. Conoco, Inc., 144 F.3d 1308, 1328 (10th Cir.1998); accord Burger v. Mays, 176 F.R.D. 153, 156-57 (E.D.Pa.1997); Haberern v. Kaupp Vascular Surgeons Ltd., 812 F.Supp. 1376, 1378 (E.D.Pa.1992); Rich v.

United States v. Viola

126 F. Supp. 718 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 1954

Count 2 it is alleged that the said Susan Washington Brown,. Reva Bunch and Edna Mae Dugan “did unlawfully, wilfully and knowingly solicit, accept and receive an expenditure from Alfred E. … Todd v. United States, 158 U.S. 278, 282 , 15 S.Ct. 889 , 39 L.Ed. 982 ; United States v. Bathgate, 246 U.S. 220 , 38 S.Ct. 269 , 62 L.Ed. 676 ; United States v. Lacher, 134 U.S. 624 , 10 S.Ct. 625 , 33 L.Ed. 1080 .

Edinboro Company v. United States

224 F. Supp. 301 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 1963

The testimony of the two witnesses Brown and Yogt indicates that golf courses after many years of careful maintenance are better courses than when originally built. … The government points out also in this case that the taxpayer introduced no evidence as to the duration of the useful life of the tees, greens and other parts of a golf course, and clearly points to Pohlen v.

Glaser v. Marietta

351 F. Supp. 555 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 1, 1972

See, e. g., Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education, 294 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1961); Woods v. Wright, 334 F.2d 369 (5th Cir. 1964); Wasson v. … Stull v. School Board, 459 F.2d 339 (3rd Cir. 1972); Axtell v. LaPenna, 323 F.Supp. 1077 (W.D.Pa.1971). 6 . Stanley v. Illinois, supra.

Kerry Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers of America

488 F. Supp. 1080 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1980

V. The Motions A. … See Frankel v.

Smith v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

978 F. Supp. 213 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 21, 1997

Board of Regents, 468 U.S. at 117 , 104 S.Ct. at 2969 (emphasis added). But see Banks v. NCAA, 746 F.Supp. 850, 857 (N.D.Ind.1990) (“[t]he Supreme Court cited Jones with apparent approval in NCAA v. … Board of Regents, 4[68] U.S. at 102, n. 24, 104 S.Ct. at 2961 n. 24. Nonetheless, after a careful reading of NCAA v.

Combs v. Homer Center School District

468 F. Supp. 2d 738 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 25, 2006

Philadelphia Fed’n of Teachers, Local No. 3 v. Board of Educ. of the Sch. Dist. of Phila., 51 Pa.Cmwlth. 296 , 414 A.2d 424, 426 (1980) (citation omitted). … Dist. and Brown v. Hot, Sexy and Safer Prods., Inc., inter alia. See also Parents United for Better Schools, Inc. v. Sch.

Bowles v. National Erie Corp.

3 F.R.D. 469 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 23, 1944

Brown, Administrator, Office of Price Administration. On his resignation, Chester Bowles was substituted as party plaintiff. … See United States v. Harris and Glick, D.C., 54 F.Supp. 563 ; United States v. Delfrate, D.C., 54 F.Supp. 565 ; Henderson v. Baldwin, D.C., 54 F.Supp. 438 .

Wolski v. City of Erie

773 F. Supp. 2d 577 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 2011

See, e.g., Pernice v. City of Chicago, 237 F.3d 783 , 787 n. 5 (7th Cir.2001) (no preclusive effect given to determination by city personnel board); Medeiros v. … See, e.g., Brown v.

Mahaven v. Pulaski Township

139 F. Supp. 2d 663 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 2001

By 1998, however, the Board of Supervisors determined that the position should be filled. The Board awarded the position to Mr. Moms, then age 37. … See Saint Mary’s Honor Ctr. v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502, 507-08 , 113 S.Ct. 2742 , 125 L.Ed.2d 407 (1993); Texas Dep’t of Community Affairs v.

Scasserra v. Pennsylvania State Civil Service Commission

363 F. Supp. 510 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 25, 1973

Scasserra v. Uniontown Newspapers, Inc., et al (C.A. 73-107, April 19, 1973). … As was stated in Philadelphia Transportation Co. v. Southeastern Pa.

Marshall v. Borough of Ambridge

798 F. Supp. 1187 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1992

Failure to Train In Brown v. … Custom or Policy The passage discussed above from Brown v.

Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. United Transportation Union

446 F. Supp. 1085 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 1978

See Schwabacher v. United States, 334 U.S. 182 , 68 S.Ct. 958 , 92 L.Ed. 1305 [1947]. … See, e. g., United Transportation Union v. Penn Central Railroad Co., 505 F.2d 542 [3d Cir. 1974],

Cable Guide Railing Construction Co. v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local Union No. 348

543 F. Supp. 405 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 1982

Todd v. Jim McNeff, Inc., 667 F.2d 800, 802 (9th Cir. 1982). … In NLRB v.

Putaro v. Carlynton School District

615 F. Supp. 2d 390 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 2009

After the interviews were completed, the interviewers (Panza, Urso, Maslyk and board member Patricia Schirripa) met to determine their final recommendations to the School Board. … See Hill v.

United States v. Conley

856 F. Supp. 1034 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 1994

Video display gambling devices are equipped at the manufacturer with a built-in knock down device on the electronic circuit board. … Building is described as a two story cream colored with brown trim cement block building.

McGinnis v. The Grand Turk

16 F. Cas. 111 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1862

As a general principle, it is not denied, that the lien of a sailors’ wages is not discharged by a sheriff’s sale,—Gallatin v. … Like the case of McDermott v. The S. G.