Case law

Coxson v. Pennsylvania

935 F. Supp. 624 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 1996

Will v. … The Pennsylvania Administrative Code of 1929 recognizes the Board of Trustees of the Polk Center as a departmental administrative board -within DPW. PA. STAT.ANN. tit. 71, § 62 (1990).

United States v. Allen

668 F. Supp. 969 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1987

See Brown v. United States, 356 U.S. 148 , 78 S.Ct. 622 , 2 L.Ed.2d 589 (1958). … Brown v.

Kohler v. United States

602 F. Supp. 747 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 1985

The Tenth Circuit in Richardson v. … The Pennsylvania Supreme Court in McDonald v.

Celec v. Edinboro University

132 F. Supp. 3d 651 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 18, 2015

The Commonwealth Court recently explained the role of the Board of Claims vis-a-vis Pennsylvania’s sovereign immunity doctrine in Armenti v. PA. … The Board of Claims was created by the Pennsylvania state legislature in 1937 to arbitrate claims arising from contracts with the Commonwealth. See Employers Ins. of Wausau v.

Tippins v. Luther

869 F. Supp. 331 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1994

See also Board of Pardons v. … Since the Greenholtz Court, and more recently the Court in Board of Pardons v.

United States v. Yingling

368 F. Supp. 379 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 1973

Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 , 74 S.Ct. 693 , 98 L.Ed. 884 (1954); Washington v. United States, 130 U.S.App.D.C. 374 , 401 F. 2d 915, 922 (1968). As early as Yick Wo v. … Two Guys from Harrison-Allentown v. McGinley, 366 U.S. 582, 588 , 81 S.Ct. 1135 , 6 L.Ed.2d 551 (1961); Shock v. Tester, 405 F.2d 852, 855 (8th Cir. 1969); Moss v.

Doe v. Sparks

733 F. Supp. 227 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1990

Padula v. … In Commonwealth v.

Nicely v. United States Steel Corp.

574 F. Supp. 184 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 1983

Plaintiff was told by the Board that he did not have a claim on which the Board could issue a complaint, and that he should file suit in federal court under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185 . … See International Union of Electrical Radio & Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, Local 790 v.

Wallace & Tiernan Products, Inc. v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.

57 F. Supp. 639 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 11, 1944

Whenever a patent on application is refused by the Board of Appeals or whenever any applicant is dissatisfied with the decision of the Board of interference examiners, the applicant, unless appeal has been taken to the United … See Wett-Laufer v. Robins, 2 Cir., 1937, 92 F.2d 573 , certiorari denied, 302 U.S. 766 , 58 S.Ct. 477 , 82 L.Ed. 594 ; Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Van Cleef 7 Cir., 139 F.2d 550 ; Galena Mfg. Co. v.

Kaehly v. City of Pittsburgh

988 F. Supp. 888 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 1997

In support of their procedural due process claim, plaintiffs rely exclusively on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s holding in Lyness v. Commonwealth, State Board of Medicine, 529 Pa. 535 , 605 A.2d 1204 (1992). … Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), the United States Supreme Court held that federal antitrust laws were inapplicable when a state, acting as a sovereign, engages in an “act of government.”

United States v. Lena

670 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1987

Defendant cites United States v. … In United States v.

United States v. Haushalter

320 F. Supp. 169 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1970

Mechanic’s National Bank v. Miner’s Bank, 13 Wkly.Notes Cas., Pa., 236 [Phila. Co., 1883]; Hanson v. Watson, 13 Wkly. Notes Cas., Pa., 534 [1883]; O’Neill v. Brown, 17 Pa.Dist.R. 1062 [York Co., 1908]. … O’Neill v. Brown, cit. supra, held that the obligation of a thief to return money stolen is a debt for which attachment lies under the Act of 1869.

Hilliard v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Pennsylvania Game Commission

308 F. Supp. 756 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 1970

Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 415 , 44 S.Ct. 149 , 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923). Patterson v. … Angel v. Bullington, supra, 330 U.S. at 186-190 , 67 S.Ct. 657 (1946), Lavasek v. White, 339 F.2d 861 , 863 (10th Cir. 1964).

Westport Ins. Corp. v. Hippo Fleming & Pertile Law Offices

349 F. Supp. 3d 468 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 2018

or any of its committees, or as a member of a formal accreditation, ethics, peer review, licensing board, standards review, or similar professional board or committee related to the practice of law. … Lutheran Brown v. Kraynak , 32 Fed. App'x. 19, 19-20 (3d Cir. 2002) ; Matinchek v. John Alden Life Ins. Co. , 93 F.3d 96 , 102 (3d Cir. 1996) ; Shafer v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins.

George v. Brehm

246 F. Supp. 242 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1965

See Brown v. City of Pittsburgh, 409 Pa, 357, 186 A.2d 399 (1962). Therefore, this Court must decide the question as it believes the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania would if the same question were presented to it. … Brown v. Pittsburgh, supra, 409 Pa. at p. 362 , 186 A.2d 399 . Therefore, it would appear that the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act does not apply and that common law principles apply.

NARANJO

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 2026

Billiteri v. U.S. Bd. of Parole, 541 F.2d 938, 944 (2d Cir. 1976). … Therefore, his challenge to the Board’s prior denial of parole on August 7, 2023 is moot. See Weiler v. Overmyer, Civ. A. No. 21-303, 2024 WL 3327771 (W.D. Pa. 2024) (collecting cases).

United States v. Yingling

371 F. Supp. 271 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 1974

United States v. Mostafavi-Kashani, 469 F.2d 224 (9th Cir. 1972). In United States v. … In Gretter v.

Lynn v. Heyl and Patterson, Inc.

483 F. Supp. 1247 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 1980

In Griffith v. … See Klarman v.

Yarbrough v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

432 F. Supp. 553 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 24, 1977

Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Missouri-Kansas R. Co., 363 U.S. 528 , 80 S.Ct. 1326 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1379 (1960); Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company v. Blackett, 538 F.2d 291 , C.A. 10, 1976; Kotakis v. … It is not claimed that the Board acted outside its jurisdiction or a fraud was perpetrated. Denver & R.G. W.R. Co. v. Blackett, supra.

United States v. Davis

350 F. Supp. 1258 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 1972

In United States v. … It should be noted that both United States v. Williams, supra, and United States v.