Case law

In Re Allegheny International, Inc.

117 B.R. 171 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 31, 1990

See In re Brown, 803 F.2d 120 , 122 (3d Cir.1986); In re Ama *175 tex Corp., 755 F.2d 1034, 1039 (3d Cir.1985). … Brown, 803 F.2d at 122. The Third Circuit utilized this pragmatic interpretation of finality in F/S Airlease II, Inc. v. Simon, 844 F.2d 99 (3d Cir.1988).

Britton v. City of Erie, Pa.

933 F. Supp. 1261 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 1995

On August 4, 1993, the Access Authority board voted to suspend all use of channel 2. … However, it has been clear since at least Yick Wo v.

Koppers Co., Inc. v. American Exp. Co.

689 F. Supp. 1371 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1988

See SEC v. … Wilshire Oil Co. v. Board of Governors, 668 F.2d 732, 736 (3d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 457 U.S. 1132 , 102 S.Ct. 2958 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1349 (1982).

Kleppick v. Pennsylvania Telephone Guild

631 F. Supp. 1073 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1986

Moreover, in Sheldon v. … See also Gurton v.

Window Glass Cutters League of America v. American St. Gobain Corp.

47 F.R.D. 255 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 7, 1969

Carey v. … Transportation-Communications Employees Union v.

Kriss v. Fayette County

827 F. Supp. 2d 477 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 27, 2011

See, e.g., Thomas v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, 2011 WL 2491365 , *17 (W.D.Pa. … See Karpiak v.

Copperweld Corporation v. Imetal

403 F. Supp. 579 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 1975

In support of this position defendant cites the test set forth in Brown Shoe Co., Inc. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S. Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962) along with the ruling of Judge Fisher in Ronson Corp. v. … In Brown Shoe Co., Inc. v.

Atkinson v. Babcock School District

460 F. Supp. 1190 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 28, 1978

In General Electric v. … (Compare General Electric v. Gilbert, supra, with Anderson v. Upper Bucks County Area Vocational Technical School, 30 Pa.Cmwlth. 103 , 373 A.2d 126 (1977).)

Straub v. Granger

143 F. Supp. 250 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 18, 1956

At a meeting of the Board of Directors of the corporation held on May 26, 1944, the board was advised that the Straub family had gained control of the corporation in order to protect its interest. … Urquhart v. Commissioner, 3. Cir., 1954, 215 F.2d 17 ; Cf. Allen V. Selig, 5 Cir., 1952, 200 F.2d 487 ; Hochschild v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 1947, 161 F.2d 817 ; Rassenfoss v.

Hages v. Aliquippa & Southern Railroad

427 F. Supp. 889 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 1977

Watkins v. Grover, 508 F.2d 920 [9th Cir. 1974]; Ryan v. J. Walter Thompson Co., 453 F.2d 444 [2d Cir. 1971]; Hudak v. Economic Research Analysts, Inc., 499 F.2d 996 [5th Cir. 1974]; Springfield Television v. … If either of these elements exist, the controversy is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the National Railroad Retirement Board. United Transportation Union v.

Doe v. Ward

124 F. Supp. 2d 900 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 18, 2000

In Cuyler v. … See United States v.

NARANJO v. COULEHAN

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 2024

ECF No. 32 at 7 (citing Brown v. Crowley, 312 F.3d 782 (6th Cir. 2002)). … However, Brown conflicts with the Third Circuit’s holding in Brightwell v. Lehman, supra.

United States ex rel. Chilcote v. Maroney

246 F. Supp. 607 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 1965

Hendrickson v. Pennsylvania State Board of Parole, 409 Pa. 204 , 185 A.2d 581 (1962); Commonwealth ex rel. Soudani v. Maroney, 200 Pa.Super. 254 , 188 A.2d 780 (1963). … Hendrickson v. Pennsylvania State Board of Parole, supra; Commonwealth ex rel. Banks v. Cain, 345 Pa. 581 , 28 A.2d 897 , 143 A.L.R. 1473 (1942).

Banks v. County of Allegheny

568 F. Supp. 2d 579 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 2008

Brown v. Borough of Chambersburg, 903 F.2d 274, 278 (3d Cir.1990).” Dkt. [122] at 18. While she may not have been a nurse or doctor, it appears that she had medical training. … Brown v. Borough of Chambersburg, 903 F.2d 274, 278 (3d Cir.1990).

Ent. Rent-A-Car Wage & Hour Emp. Practices Lit.

735 F. Supp. 2d 277 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 13, 2010

Hickton asserts that ERAC-Pittsburgh’s board did not act as an independent board, but rather acted via written consents. … NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Indus. of Pa., Inc., 691 F.2d 1117, 1124 (3d Cir.1982).

Phinizy v. Pharmacare

569 F. Supp. 2d 512 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 24, 2008

Brown v. DB Sales, Inc., No. Civ.A. 04-1512, 2005 WL 3591533 (E.D.Pa. Dec. 29, 2005), is factually similar, but distinguishable in a critical way. … In deciding whether Brown was retaliated against for absences related to caring for his mother, the court noted a factual issue as to whether Brown’s time away from work should be designated as FMLA leave and assumed for

Washington-East Washington Joint Authority v. Roberts & Schaefer Co.

180 F. Supp. 15 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1960

v. … A recent case on the points under discussion is that of Browne v.

Wagner v. Township of Harmar

651 F. Supp. 1286 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1987

Scudder v. Greendale, 704 F.2d 999, 1002 (7th Cir.1983). … The federal courts will not sit as a zoning review board and where no constitutionally prohibited deprivation of property has occurred, challenges to the township’s action are the province of the state courts. Hynes v.

Barrett v. Tullio

509 F. Supp. 1216 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1981

by the Board, unless otherwise prescribed by the Board. … This court feels that the issue of the constitutionality of veteran’s preference was clearly established by the United States Supreme Court in Personnel Administration of Massachusetts v.

Henry Wilhelm Co. v. Heiner

21 F.2d 463 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 23, 1927

Tax Rep. 6172; Appeal of National Refining Co. of Ohio (Board of Tax Appeals, Decision No. 94) 1 B. T. A. 236. In this connection, it may be noted that in the case of United States v. Robert L. Crook and Daniel H. … UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL REFINING COMPANY Of OHIO, Defendant. UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. CUDAHY OIL COMPANY, Defendant. (Nos. 13303, 13304.) District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D. December 15, 1926.