Case law

Local Union 3074, District 15, United Steel Workers v. Shore

386 F. Supp. 600 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1974

The contract bar doctrine is not statutorily mandated, but is one which can be applied by the Board to lend stability and fairness to a contract. See Confederated Independent Union v. … The Court perceives no violation of § 9(b)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act by the application of the contract bar rule in this factual setting, and thus the principle enunciated in Leedom v.

Fiore v. Kelly Run Sanitation, Inc.

609 F. Supp. 909 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 30, 1985

Browning-Ferris Industries, 104 F.R.D. 133 (W.D.Pa.1985), in opposition to a similar motion by BFI, Inc. to dismiss. … In a separate proceeding, Fiore had appealed the DER’s suspension of the Phase I pit permit (August 4,1983) before the Environmental Hearing Board (EHB).

Grupp v. United Steelworkers

532 F. Supp. 102 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 16, 1982

Board. … See, Eisenberg v. Wellington Hall Nursing Home, Inc., 651 F.2d 902 (3d Cir. 1981); Eisenberg v. Hartz Mountain Corporation, 519 F.2d 138 (3d Cir. 1975).

BROWN

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 2025

, ) ) v. ) 1:25cv53 ) … See Bracey v.

Wuyscik v. United States Department of Labor

126 F. Supp. 3d 507 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 2015

See O.P.M. v. … See also Watson v.

Flaherty v. Keystone Oaks School District

247 F. Supp. 2d 698 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 26, 2003

Sypniewski v. Warren Hills Regional Bd. of Educ., 307 F.3d 243 , 258 (3d Cir.2002). … Killion, 186 F.Supp.2d at 459, citing, Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41, 56 , 119 S.Ct. 1849 , 144 L.Ed.2d 67 (1999) and Kolender v.

Haagensen v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

651 F. Supp. 2d 422 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 2009

Chambers v. … V § 10(c). Furthermore, the Supreme Court reviews the findings and recommendations of the Disciplinary Board. Pa.R.D.E. 208(e).

Ickes v. Grassmeyer

30 F. Supp. 3d 375 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 2014

Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75, 81-87 , 104 S.Ct. *389 892 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984). … Board of County Commissioners v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

Hudson v. Thornburgh

770 F. Supp. 1030 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 1991

See, Owens-El v. Robinson, 442 F.Supp. 1368 (W.D.Pa.1978) and Owens-El v. Robinson, 457 F.Supp. 984 (W.D.Pa.1978); aff'd Inmates of the Allegheny County Jail v. … In Bell v.

INGRAM v. SCHWAB

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 2024

The Magistrate Judge also explained that any § 1983 claim against a Parole Board member exercising an adjudicatory function is barred by the rule in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). … Brown v. Williams, 644 F. App’x 117, 120 (3d Cir. 2016). It is true, as stated in Burkett v.

Hill v. Fleming

169 F. Supp. 240 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 1958

National Labor Relations Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co., 1956, 351 U.S. 149, 155 , 76 S.Ct. 753 , 100 L.Ed. 1027 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Co., 1939, 306 U.S. 292, 300 , 59 S.Ct. 501 , 83 L.Ed. 660 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

Flanders v. Dzugan

156 F. Supp. 3d 648 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 11, 2016

See DeBlasio v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 53 F.3d 592 (3d Cir.1995), overruled in non-relevant part by United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. v. Twp. of Warrington, 316 F.3d 392 (2003); Nicolette v. … Nor has Flanders demonstrated a pattern of antagonism between himself and any members serving on the Board of Appeals. Cf. Marra v. Phila.

KENGERSKI v. THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 2022

JEFFREY KENGERSKI, ) ) ) 2:17-cv-1048 v. … Otherwise, absent a specific proffer, any other testimony from Officers Brown, Tucker, and Coulter is irrelevant. D.

Brunwasser v. Strassburger

490 F. Supp. 959 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 29, 1980

Doe v. … England v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 375 U.S. 411, 419 , 84 S.Ct. 461, 467 , 11 L.Ed.2d 440 (1964).

Shields v. Watrel

333 F. Supp. 260 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 2, 1971

Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); Slochower v. … Board of Higher Education, 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 (1956); Wieman v. Updegraff, 344 U.S. 183 , 73 S.Ct. 215 , 97 L.Ed. 216 (1952); Roth v. Board of Regents, 446 F.2d 806 (7th Cir. 1971); Lucas v.

Bruni v. City of Pittsburgh

283 F. Supp. 3d 357 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 2017

Brown v. City of Pittsburgh , 586 F.3d 263 (3d Cir. 2009). … In Hill v.

APT Pittsburgh Ltd. Partnership v. Lower Yoder Township

111 F. Supp. 2d 664 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 2000

Fernley v. Board of Supervisors of Schuylkill Township, 509 Pa. 413 , 502 A.2d 585, 597 (1985). … Guelich Explosives Co. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Mifflin Township, 105 Pa.

Pellegrino Food Products Co. v. City of Warren

136 F. Supp. 2d 391 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 6, 2000

See Kentucky v. … Bevivino’s picture-taking was ostensibly for the purpose of presenting evidence to the Zoning Board, and therefore is also conduct protected by the doctrine. See King v.

US Airline Pilots Ass'n v. U.S. Airways, Inc.

25 F. Supp. 3d 758 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 2014

Plaintiff cites Hart v. … See Schneider v. Southern Ry.

McCachren v. Blacklick Valley School District

217 F. Supp. 2d 594 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 16, 2002

In W.B. v. … Doe v. County of Centre, 242 F.3d 437, 457 (3d Cir.2001). No claims for punitive damages against the school district and school board will be permitted to proceed. 10 *603 VII.