Case law

Evancho v. Pine-Richland School District

237 F. Supp. 3d 267 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 27, 2017

See Oncale v. … Corp. v.

Pritts v. Walter Lowery Trucking Company

400 F. Supp. 867 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 3, 1975

Lewis, 254 Or. 52 , 457 P.2d 483 (1969); Jones v. Dague, 252 S.C. 261 , 166 S.E.2d 99 (1969); Tom Brown Drilling Co. v. Nieman, 418 S.W.2d 337 (Tex.Civ.App.1967); Bentzler v. … Radio, television, the printed media and bill boards all carry some form of the ‘Buckle Up For Safety’ message with regularity.

Walker v. United Mine Workers of America

105 F. Supp. 608 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 1952

As stated by Judge Parker in Amazon Cotton Mill Co. v. … California Ass’n of Employers v. Bldg. & Construction Trades Council of Reno, Nev., 9 Cir., 1949, 178 F.2d 175 ; Amalgamated Ass’n etc., v. Dixie Motor Coach Corp., 8 Cir., 1948, 170 F.2d 902 ; Amazon Cotton Mill Co. v.

Robinson v. Magovern

521 F. Supp. 842 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 1981

Brown Shoe Co., Inc. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 336 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1529 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). … Brown Shoe Co., Inc. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 324 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1523 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962) (section 7 of Clayton Act).

NAJAR

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 2025

Oklahoma City v. … Berg v. County of Allegheny, 219 F.3d 261, 276 (3d Cir. 2000) (quoting Board of Cty. Comm'rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. at 404).

In re Bartenbach

82 F. Supp. 649 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1949

In September, 1942, he was called by his local draft board in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for physical examination. … I call attention to the case of Cox v.

United Mine Workers of America v. Peggs Run Coal Co.

343 F. Supp. 68 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1972

United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp., 363 U.S. 593 , 80 S.Ct. 1358 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1424 (1960); see Retail Clerks International Association v. … See United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp., supra; United Steelworkers of America v.

United States ex rel. Kameshka v. Neff

327 F. Supp. 459 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1970

Judicial interpretation of the limits of re-examination was outlined by the Supreme Court in Estep v. … The question of jurisdiction of the local board is reached only if there is no basis in fact for the classification which it gave the registrant.” Citing the Estep case as authority, the Court of Appeals in Petrie v.

Arneault v. O'Toole

864 F. Supp. 2d 361 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2012

(citing Berry v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State Univ., 715 F.2d 971, 981 (5th Cir.1983)). … Argusta v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 643 F.3d 60, 72 (3d Cir.2011) (citing Brown v. Muhlenberg Township, 269 F.3d 205, 216 (3d Cir.2001)).

School District v. Interim Operating Committee of Administrative Unit No. 21

329 F. Supp. 736 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 1971

In School District of West Homestead v. … See also Chartiers Valley Joint Schools v. Allegheny County Board, 418 Pa. 520 , 211 A.2d 487 (1965), concurring opinion of Mr.

Curry v. United States Forest Service

988 F. Supp. 541 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 1997

See Chrysler v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 298-301 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1716-17 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979) (determining whether the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1905 , addresses formal agency action). … A board foot is the amount of wood contained in an unfinished board one inch thick, twelve inches long and twelve inches wide. Ayers v. Espy, 873 F.Supp. 455, 460 (D.Colo.1994). 7 .

Courson v. Bert Bell NFL Player Retirement Plan

75 F. Supp. 2d 424 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 11, 1999

Mitchell v. … See Patterson v.

BILLINGSLEY v. ACTING CHAIRMAN OF THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 2, 2021

In this case, pro se state prisoner Juan Billingsley filed a Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus (the “Petition”) challenging the decision of Respondent Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole … See Tice v. Wilson, 425 F. Supp. 2d 676, 680 (W.D. Pa. 2006); see also Fed. R. Civ.

United States ex rel. Schuck v. Maroney

192 F. Supp. 335 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1961

Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 487 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 . … Brown v. Allen, supra, 344 U.S. at page 485 , 73 S.Ct. at page 421 ; United States v. Rosenberg, 2 Cir., 1952, 200 F.2d 666, 668 ; United States ex rel. Cobb v.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS' MEDICAL PLAN v. SCHWARTZMILLER

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 22, 2021

However, the case relied upon by the Medical Plan, i.e., Board of Trustees of Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters’ Medical Plan v. Clouser, 2020 WL 1508698, at *1-2 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2020), is distinguishable. … V.

Project Vote v. Kelly

805 F. Supp. 2d 152 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 2011

Board of County Commissioners v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997), quoting Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327, 330 , 106 S.Ct. 662 , 88 L.Ed.2d 662 (1986). … Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 729-730 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). Pennsylvania’s election laws apply equally to federal and state elections. Kuznik v.

Lansberry v. Altoona Area Sch. Dist.

318 F. Supp. 3d 739 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 2018

Comm'rs of Bryan Cty., Okl. v. Brown , 520 U.S. 397 , 400, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) (citing Monell , 436 U.S. at 694 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 , 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978) ). … But Lansberry also alleges that, at the same meeting , a member of AASD's board of directors acknowledged that the attorney's report was "collecting dust" and had not been reviewed by the board. ( Id. at ¶ 24.)

United States ex rel. Lyle v. Maroney

260 F. Supp. 689 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 1966

Rawlings v. Botula et al., D.C., 260 F.Supp. 298 , and the same principles are applicable here. … Kloiber v. Myers, 237 F.Supp. 682 (D.C.Pa.1965); Kunkle v. Claudy, 112 F.Supp. 598 (D.C.Pa.1953); Commonwealth ex rel. Banks v. Cain, 345 Pa. 583 , 28 A.2d 897 , 143 *691 A.L.R. 1473 (1943); Commonwealth ex rel.

Fross v. County of Allegheny

612 F. Supp. 2d 651 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 2009

Salem Twp., 964 A.2d 869 , 876 n. 7 (Pa.2009) (finding a direct conflict between state law and a local ordinance where the ordinance forbade what the state law allowed); Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board v. … Apparently, the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole is still requiring that home plans comply with the ordinance. See Menifee v. McVey, Civil Action No. 09-0104 (W.D.Pa.2009).

MDB v. Punxsutawney Christian Sch.

386 F. Supp. 3d 565 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 3, 2019

Board of Cty. Com'rs of Bryan Cty. v. Brown , 520 U.S. 397 , 409, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … See id. ; Brown v. Sch. Dist. of Phila. , 456 F. App'x 88 , 90 n.5 (3d Cir. 2011) (holding that school's failure to expel or punish a violent student is not an affirmative act); D.R. by L.R. v. Middle Bucks Area Vo.