Case law

Pontius v. Children's Hospital

552 F. Supp. 1352 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1982

United States v. National Assn. of Real Estate Boards, 339 U.S. [485] at 489 [ 70 S.Ct. 711 at 714 , 94 L.Ed. 1007 ]. … Brown Shoe Co., Inc. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 336 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1529 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962).

POPE v. WILKINSBURG BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 2019

Donovan served as President of the District’s School Board from 2012 through December 2017. Def. CSUMF ¶ 15. Brown was elected to the District’s School Board in 2013. Def. CSUMF ¶ 16. … White v. Brown, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41583, *21-23 (D. Del. April 28, 2010) (quoting above, Pope is unable to demonstrate a deprivation of her rights under the First Amendment. See Ridgewood Bd. of Educ. v.

United States v. Zasadni

206 F. Supp. 318 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 1962

The question of jurisdiction of the Local Board is reached only if there is no basis in fact for the classification it gave the defendant, Estep v. … Cox v. United States, supra. This court does not sit as a super draft board. Witmer v. United States, supra, 348 U.S. at p. 380 , 75 S.Ct. at p. 395 .

Mullen v. Thompson

155 F. Supp. 2d 448 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 1, 2001

See Layton v. Beyer, 953 F.2d 839, 845 (3d Cir.1992); Stephany v. Wagner, 835 F.2d 497, 500 (3d Cir.1987). … Indeed, the First Amendment does not require a school board to hold public meetings for the purpose of gaining input from the public. Minnesota State Board For Community Colleges v.

Warnick v. NMC-Wollard, Inc.

512 F. Supp. 2d 318 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 2007

grate of the running board (known as “grip-strut”). … In re Brown, 951 F.2d 564, 569 (3d Cir.1991) (internal quotation marks omitted).

United States ex rel. Zabadlija v. Garfinkel

77 F. Supp. 751 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 15, 1948

On January 9, 1948, the Board dismissed the appeal. … Weddeke v. Watkins, 2 Cir., 166 F.2d 369 . Also see United States ex rel. Von Kleczkowski v. Watkins, D.C., 71 F.Supp., 429 ; United States ex rel. Ickowicz v. Day, D.C., 18 F.2d 962 ; Wong Shong Been v.

Petrosky v. Washington-Greene County Branch Pennsylvania Ass'n for the Blind

663 F. Supp. 821 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1987

Plaintiff was fired due to her inability to get along with Board members in general. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Plaintiff established a prima facie case under the guidelines set by McDonnell Douglas v. … See Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57, 106 S.Ct. 2399 , 91 L.Ed.2d 49 (1986). We are unconvinced that the hostility between the Board in general and the plaintiff was a result of her charge.

VOGUE TOWER PARTNERS VII, LLC v. THE CHARTIERS TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 2024

No. 1 v. Upper Chichester TP., 504 F.3d 370, 379 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Cellular Tel. Co. v. … Co. v.

General Warehousemen & Employees Union Local No. 636 v. J. C. Penney Co.

484 F. Supp. 130 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 1980

That decision was vacated by the Board on different grounds. … Pollard responded that he would have to caucus with Brown and Sharp.

FIELDS

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 2025

Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. 209, 221 (2005). … Brown Christopher B.

Burns v. County of Cambria, Pa.

788 F. Supp. 868 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 3, 1991

Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co., 258 U.S. 165, 177 , 42 S.Ct. 264, 267 , 66 L.Ed. 538 (1922), citing Hovey v. McDonald, 109 U.S. 150, 157 , 3 S.Ct. 136, 140 , 27 L.Ed. 888 (1883), and Merrimack River Savings Bank v. … Gardner v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Company, 559 F.2d 209, 212 (3d Cir.1977) *870 aff'd 437 U.S. 478 , 98 S.Ct. 2451 , 57 L.Ed.2d 364 . In Katz v.

McMurray v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

50 F.2d 968 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1931

of the board being defendants herein. … A.) 231 F. 571, 592 ; California v. S. Pac. Co., 157 U. S. 229 , 15 S. Ct. 591 , 39 L. Ed. 683 . The bill of complaint must be dismissed.

United States v. Owens

256 F. Supp. 861 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 25, 1966

See United States v. Moore, D.D.C., 258 F.Supp. 790 opinion by Chief Judge Bazelon filed July 12,1966; United States v. Whitney, 65 Crim. 160, S.D.N.Y., and United States v. … Dodge, 64 Crim. 619, S.D.N.Y., opinions filed by Chief Judge Lumbard on March 30, 1966; and United States v. Pope, 251 F.Supp. 234 (D.Neb., 1966) opinion by Judge Van Pelt, approved by Chief Judge Vogel.

Drusky v. Judges of Supreme Court

324 F. Supp. 332 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1971

It is doubtful that the National Labor Relations Board could be regarded as a “person” within the meaning of the Civil Rights Statutes. See Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 , 81 S.Ct. 473 , 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961) and Olson v. … International Alliance, etc., 182 F.2d 158 (9th Cir. 1950) and Drusky v. National Labor Relations Board, et al., Civil Action 68-124 (W.D.Pa.1968).

Roy v. Jones

349 F. Supp. 315 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 16, 1972

A judge may object to the findings and report of the Board, in which case he has the right to another hearing before the Board prior to presentation of the record of proceedings and findings of the Board to the Supreme Court … The Board has no financial interest in the outcome of the proceedings. Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 , 47 S.Ct. 437 , 71 L.Ed. 749 (1927); Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v.

United States v. Kezmes

125 F. Supp. 300 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 22, 1954

I have a very definite feeling that this case fits in perfectly with Note 8 in Judge Goodrich’s dissent in United States v. Hagaman, 3 Cir., 213 F.2d 86 . … Under all of the circumstances, I have to reluctantly conclude, on the authority of Dickinson v.

Evancho v. Pine-Richland School District

237 F. Supp. 3d 267 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 27, 2017

See Oncale v. … Corp. v.

Pritts v. Walter Lowery Trucking Company

400 F. Supp. 867 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 3, 1975

Lewis, 254 Or. 52 , 457 P.2d 483 (1969); Jones v. Dague, 252 S.C. 261 , 166 S.E.2d 99 (1969); Tom Brown Drilling Co. v. Nieman, 418 S.W.2d 337 (Tex.Civ.App.1967); Bentzler v. … Radio, television, the printed media and bill boards all carry some form of the ‘Buckle Up For Safety’ message with regularity.

Walker v. United Mine Workers of America

105 F. Supp. 608 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 1952

As stated by Judge Parker in Amazon Cotton Mill Co. v. … California Ass’n of Employers v. Bldg. & Construction Trades Council of Reno, Nev., 9 Cir., 1949, 178 F.2d 175 ; Amalgamated Ass’n etc., v. Dixie Motor Coach Corp., 8 Cir., 1948, 170 F.2d 902 ; Amazon Cotton Mill Co. v.

Robinson v. Magovern

521 F. Supp. 842 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 1981

Brown Shoe Co., Inc. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 336 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1529 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). … Brown Shoe Co., Inc. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 324 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1523 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962) (section 7 of Clayton Act).