Case law

EDMONDSON v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 2025

Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 67-68 (1991); Reinert v. … Heacock v.

Begun v. United States

421 U.S. 961 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 12, 1975

Pymatuning Water Shed Citizens for a Hygienic Environment v. Eaton

506 F. Supp. 902 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 14, 1980

Brown, Secretary-Treasurer. … The additional defendants are the members of the Board of the Authority.

ELLIS v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 2025

Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 67-68 (1991); Reinert v. … Petitioner’s challenge to the Board’s statutory authority to recalculate his maximum sentence under Pennsylvania law falls squarely into this category. See, e.g., Crosby v.

Goldhaber v. Higgins

576 F. Supp. 2d 694 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 2007

Actions taken by Judge George in his capacity as a member of the Adams County Prison Board are not judicial acts. Padgett v. … Board of County Commissioners of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382, 1388 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626, 639 (1997) (emphasis in original).

General Electric Co. v. Deutz AG

129 F. Supp. 2d 776 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 31, 2000

See Greenleaf v. Garlock, Inc., 174 F.3d 352, 358 (3d Cir.1999); First Jersey Nat’l Bank v. Brown, 951 F.2d 564, 569 (3d Cir.1991). … Greenleaf v. Garlock, Inc., 174 F.3d 352, 358 (3d Cir.1999); see also Brown, 951 F.2d at 569 . 9 .

Wareham v. Dollar Bank

937 F. Supp. 2d 656 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 2013

Keller v. Orix Credit Alliance, Inc., 130 F.3d 1101, 1109 (3d Cir.1997) (en banc). Thus, in analyzing this prong, “ ‘federal courts are not arbitral boards ruling on the strength of ‘cause’ for discharge. … Brown v. Kaz, 581 F.3d 175 , 182 n. 5 (3d Cir.2009).

Bagator

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 2026

remain unchanged.”); Nunez Ramos v. Noem, No. 3:25-CV-00387, 2025 WL 3687335, at *4 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 19, 2025) (Brown, M.J.); Vasquez Mejia v. Noem, No. 3:25-CV-00338, 2025 WL 3546427, at *4 (W.D. Pa. … Dec. 11, 2025) (Brown, M.J.); Ico Coc v. Warden Leonard Oddo, No. 3:25-CV-003881, 2025 WL 38753965 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2025) (Taylor, M.J.); Silua Cova v. Rose, No. 3:26-cv-101 (W.D.

Shore v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America

316 F. Supp. 426 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 13, 1970

Where as here, Congress has vested the Board with the power to grant and fashion appropriate relief, the power of the Board is broad. Teamsters Local Union No. 5 v. N.L.R.B., 406 F.2d 439 , C.A. 5, 1969; N.L.R.B. v. … Stevens & Co. v. N.L.R.B., 388 F.2d 892 (C.A. 4, 1967).

Whittaker v. County of Lawrence

674 F. Supp. 2d 668 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 2009

Board of County Commissioners v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) (internal quotation marks omitted). … Brown v. Muhlenberg Township, 269 F.3d 205, 213 (3d Cir.2001).

NOEM

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2025

See Vasquez Mejia v. Noem, et al., Case No. 3:25-cv-333, 2025 WL 3546427 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 11, 2025) (Brown, M.J.) (rejecting Hurtado decision); Calzado Diaz v. Noem, et al., Case No. 3:25-cv-0458, 2025 WL 3628480 (W.D. … Leng May Ma v. Barber, 357 U.S. 185, 187 (1958) (quoting Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. Mezei, 345 U.S. 206 (1953)); see also Zadvydas v.

Tukesbrey v. Midwest Transit, Inc.

822 F. Supp. 1192 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 19, 1993

Fann v. Modlin, 687 F.Supp. 218, 220 (E.D.N.C.1988). Accord Burkart v. Post-Browning, Inc., 859 F.2d 1245, 1247 (6th Cir.1988). Congress’ intent was to place reservists on equal footing with other employees. … TYK Refractories Co., in which it declined to give preclusive effect in a § 1981 action for race discrimination to fact findings made by an unemployment compensation board of review (“UC Board”).

PRICE

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 1, 2026

Ventura v. Shalala, 55 F.3d 900, 901 (3d Cir. 1995) (quoting Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971)). … While district courts should uphold military board decisions when they find substantial evidence supports them, Green v. Westphal, 94 Fed.

Thomas v. Potter Title & Trust Co.

2 F. Supp. 12 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1932

A. 6); Topas v. John MacGregor Grant, Inc., 18 F.(2d) 724, 725 , 52 A. L. R. 807 (C. C. A. 2); Maryland Casualty Co. v. Board of Education, 20 F.(2d) 799, 801 (C. C. A. 3). … In Western Tie & Timber Co. v. Brown, 196 U. S. 502 , 25 S. Ct. 339 , 49 L. Ed. 571 , a bankrupt was indebted to the timber company. The timber company was’ indebted to the bankrupt as trustee.

Bowles v. Pechersky

64 F. Supp. 641 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 14, 1946

Bowles v. Hall (Bowles v. Holliday) D.C., 62 F.Supp. 486 . … Bowles v. Hall (Bowles v. Holliday), D.C., 62 F. Supp. 486 ; Brown, Adm’r, v. Hecht Co., 78 U.S.App.D.C. 98 , 137 F.2d 689, 691 ; Bowles v. American Stores, Inc., 78 U.S.

Riverside Lodge No. 164 v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Iron, Steel & Tin Workers of North America

13 F. Supp. 873 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 1935

Morrison v. Ingles et al., 2 Western Weckly Reports, 50; British Columbia Telephone Co. v. International Brotherhood, 29 B.C. 289; Hatch v. Grand Lodge, 233 Ill.App. 495 ; Local No. 7 of Bricklayers’ Union v. … Mattey v. Mashock, 25 Schuylkill Leg.Rec. (Pa.) 351, supra; British Columbia Telephone Co. v. International Brotherhood, 29 B.C. 289, supra; Morrison v.

Frazier v. Mabus

901 F. Supp. 2d 600 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 2012

Brown). On May 4, 2005, Plaintiffs PEBD was corrected and he was scheduled for consideration by the ERSB. See R. at 164; Defendants’ Brief at 10. … Neal v.

Kobell v. Amalgamated Council of Greyhound Unions

758 F. Supp. 1060 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 1990

Hirsch v. … Hirsch v.

Flinchbaugh v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.

531 F. Supp. 110 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 1982

See, e.g., Fine v. Semet, 514 F.Supp. 34 (S.D.Fla.1981); Weeks v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Arkansas, 491 F.Supp. 1312 (E.D.Ark.1980); Cawley v. NMU Pension & Welfare Plan, 457 F.Supp. 301, 303 (S.D.N.Y.1978). … See, Phelan v. Middle States Oil Corp., 220 F.2d 593, 604 (2d Cir. 1955); In re: Flagg’s Estate, 365 Pa. 82 , 73 A.2d 411 (1950).

Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company v. Murphy

369 F. Supp. 11 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1974

Fehr v. … See Gutekunst v.