Case law

Unity Real Estate Co. v. Hudson

977 F. Supp. 717 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1997

David Jamison, Unity’s current president, attended meetings of both boards on behalf of South Union-WV. … See United States v.

Mursau Corp. v. Florida Penn Oil & Gas, Inc.

638 F. Supp. 259 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1986

Jack Eckerd Corp. v. Dart Group Corp., 621 F.Supp. 725, 730 (D.Del.1985); Connelly v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, 463 F.Supp. 914, 919 (E.D.Pa. 1978) (citing Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. … Hutton & Co. v. Brown, 305 F.Supp. 371, 388 (S.D.Texas, 1969); 7 C.J.S., Attorney and Client, §§ 61-62, 65. It is clear that an attorney client relationship exists only with the consent of both parties.

ZEIGLER v. BARTHA

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 2024

United States v. Bell, 238 F. Supp. 2d 696, 699 (M.D. Pa. 2003); see also Bieros v. Nicola, 857 F. Supp. 445, 446 (E.D. … “As a limited public forum, a school board meeting ‘is not open for endless public commentary speech but instead is simply a limited platform to discuss the topic at hand.’” Miller v. Goggin, 672 F.

Gagliardi v. United States

788 F. Supp. 870 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1991

Zankel v. United States, 921 F.2d 432, 436 (2d Cir.1990); Borzeka v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 444, 447 (9th Cir.1984); Jordan v. United States, 694 F.2d 833, 836 (D.C.Cir.1982) (per curiam). … Jordan v. United States, 694 F.2d at 836 . Also see, e.g., Piendak v. Local Board No. 5, 318 F.Supp. 1393 (W.D.Pa.1970) (although plaintiff did not serve the U.S.

International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. US Airways, Inc.

287 F. Supp. 2d 599 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 2003

Co. v. … Co. v. CSX R.R.

Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. v. Yackovich

99 F.R.D. 518 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 24, 1982

In Medunic v. … In Livingston Powdered Metal, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 669 F.2d 133, 136 (3d Cir.1982), the Third Circuit stated that the court should consider whether the default was willfully caused by the defendant.

Bonar v. Hopkins

311 F. Supp. 130 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1969

Peterson v. Wiggins, supra; Thomas v. Central R. Co. of New Jersey, 194 Pa. 511 , 45 A. 344 (1900); Union of Russian Societies, etc. v. Koss, supra; Mason v. C. … Lewis Lavine, Inc., 302 Pa. 472 , 153 A. 754 (1931); Roller v. Pennsylvania R. Co., supra; Wilbert v. Pittsburgh Consolidation Coal Co., supra; Davis v. Miller, 385 Pa. 348 , 123 A.2d 422 (1956); Brown v.

United States v. Supreme Court

151 F. Supp. 681 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 9, 1957

Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. 200, 218, 219 , 70 S.Ct. 587 , 94 L.Ed. 761 . … Darr v. Burford, supra.

Stackpole v. Granger

136 F. Supp. 382 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 1955

See Gillette’s Estate v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 1950, 182 F.2d 1010 ; Cowles v. United States, 2 Cir., 1945, 152 F.2d 212 ; Lippincott v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 1934, 72 F.2d 788 . 2. … Kirk, supra; Miller v. Miller, supra; Commonwealth ex rel. Rossi v. Rossi, 1947, 161 Pa.Super. 86 , 53 A.2d 887 ; Forbes v. Forbes, supra; Greene v. Greene, 1942, 150 Pa.Super. 182 , 27 A.2d 525 ; Schofield v.

Mutual Life Insurance v. Ginsburg

131 F. Supp. 950 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 1, 1954

United States v. E. I. Du Pont De *953 Nemours & Co., D.C.W.D.Ill.1952, 13 F.R.D. 98, 104 . It seems to be conceded that Mr. … See: Hawkey v. United States, D.C.E.D.Ill.1952, 108 F.Supp. 941 ; Brown v. United States, D.C.N.D.Iowa 1949, 84 F.Supp. 489 ; Strunk V. United States, D.C.E.D.Ky.1948, 80 F.Supp. 432 ; Hoffman v.

BHATTACHARYA v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH-OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 2025

See generally Swierkiewicz v. Sorema, N.A., 534 U.S. 506 (2002). … Defendant’s contention that Plaintiff has already received sufficient comparator evidence ignores the actions of the appeals board and that Plaintiff is entitled to all relevant evidence. See Pearson v.

Blue v. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp.

437 F. Supp. 715 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1977

McNutt v. General Motors Accept. Corp., 298 U.S. 178 , 56 S.Ct. 780 , 80 L.Ed. 1135 (1936); Krasnov v. Dinan, 465 F.2d 1298 (3rd Cir. 1972); McSparran v. … Gallagher v. Philadelphia Transp. Co., 185 F.2d 543 (3rd Cir. 1950); Gordon v.

LARSON TEXTS, INC. v. O'NEIL

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 2023

[V]oting to approve a Guaranty Compensation Plan following the removal of Defendant O’Neil from the Board of Directors and eliminating his salary and benefits. b. … V.

In re Westinghouse Securities Litigation

832 F. Supp. 948 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 1993

Lazard allegedly also prepared a document for use at the February 27, 1991 board meeting entitled Westinghouse Electric — Board Meeting Q & A, and which read as follows: Q: Are the reserves adequate? … In Rochez Bros., Inc. v.

Luria Bros. v. Allen

512 F. Supp. 596 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1981

At that time he was also a member of the Board of Directors of Bollinger. Greene at the time was an officer of Bollinger and a member of its Board of Directors. … A similar construction seems inherent in Gross v.

Estate of Newcomer

447 F. Supp. 1368 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1978

See, e.g., Diefenthal v. United States, 343 F.Supp. 1208, 1210 (E.D.La. 1972). Jurisdiction is provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (a)(1). … Ithaca Trust Co. v. United States, 279 U.S. 151, 155 , 49 S.Ct. 291 , 73 L.Ed. 647 (1929); Walter v. United States, 341 F.2d 182, 185 (6th Cir. 1965).

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gemma

301 F. Supp. 3d 523 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 2018

Foster Co. v. … See, e.g. , Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Cola , 745 F.Supp.2d 588 , 626 (E.D.

Wittekamp v. Gulf & Western, Inc.

788 F. Supp. 246 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 1992

In Celotex v. … Matthews v. Ashland Chemical, Inc., 703 F.2d 921 (5th Cir.1983); Frey v. Woodard, 748 F.2d 173 (3d Cir.1984). Plaintiff cannot prevail on the motion presently before the court.

Brever v. Federated Equity Management Co.

233 F.R.D. 429 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 2005

Green v. … Co. v.

Phillips v. NORTHWEST REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS

669 F. Supp. 2d 555 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 27, 2009

Brown v. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Med., 760 A.2d 863, 868 (Pa.Super.Ct.2000). … Brown, id. at 869, quoting Restatement (2d) of Torts, § 433 (1965).