Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,323 results
1.32s
Fraley v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
294 F. Supp. 1193 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 1969
Curtis Brown Co., 260 U.S. 516 , 43 S.Ct. 170 , 67 L.Ed. 372 ), nor are the activities of subsidiary corporations (Peterson v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 205 U.S. 364 , 27 S.Ct. 513 , 51 L.Ed. 841 ; Cannon Mfg. Co. v. … See particularly Robertson v. Railroad Labor Board, 268 U.S. 619, 622 , 45 S.Ct. 621 , 69 L.Ed. 1119 (1925); and Cohens v. Com. of Virginia, 6 Wheat. 264, 428-429 , 5 L.Ed. 257 (1821). . See note 5, supra. .
Cited 7 timesPublishedTeamsters Joint Council 40 (J.C.) v. United States
238 F. Supp. 301 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 1965
Justice White in Burlington Truck Lines v. … The other two cases cited by plaintiffs, American Newspaper Publishers Assn. v. National Labor Relations Board, 345 U.S. 100 , 73 S.Ct. 552 , 97 L.Ed. 852 (1953), and National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedChostkov v. City of Pittsburgh
177 F. 936 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1910
Ct. 532 ; Barr v. Philadelphia, 191 Pa. 438 , 43 Atl. 335 ; Major v. Aldan Borough, 209 Pa. 247 , 58 Atl. 490 . … This is stated more at length and perhaps more clearly in Keller v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedRANKIN v. PTC GROUP HOLDINGS LLC
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 2023
United States v. … In Meek v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMakoroff v. City of Lockport, New York (In Re Guterl Special Steel Corp.)
111 B.R. 107 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 1990
Lockport and Niagara rely on Maryland National Bank v. … In Equibank, N.A. v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.
Cited 3 timesPublished188 F. Supp. 431 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 1960
Goldman v. Folsom, 3 Cir., 1957, 246 F.2d 776, 778 ; Ferenz v. Folsom, 3 Cir., 1956, 237 F.2d 46 . … National Labor Relations Board, 1951, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 , we “may not substitute [our] inferences for those of the referee which are supported by substantial evidence.” Ferenz v.
Cited 3 timesPublished315 F. Supp. 1252 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 1970
(Tr. 65-77) In May, 1969, she accepted a position as Casework Assistant I with the Butler County Board of Assistance. … IV 2 *1255 In Wright v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedInternational Union of Electrical Workers v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
455 F. Supp. 392 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 1978
See Falsetti v. UMW, 355 F.2d 658 (3d Cir. 1966); Liotta v. Natl Forge Co., CA 78-25 Erie (W.D.Pa. May 22, 1978) and Judge Teitelbaum’s decision in Fannie v. Chamberlin Mfg. … Co. v.
Cited 4 timesPublished541 F. Supp. 778 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 1982
Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 573 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2707 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at 573, n.2 , 92 S.Ct. at 2707, n.2 . 7 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedDaniels v. Anchor Hocking Corp.
758 F. Supp. 326 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 27, 1991
Anderson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, 907 F.2d 1072 , 1075 n. 2 (11th Cir.1990); Brown v. … See *335 Egert v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co., 900 F.2d 1032, 1035 (7th Cir.1990). Anderson v. Blue Cross, supra, 907 F.2d at 1076 quoting Brown v. Blue Cross, 898 F.2d at 1561-62 .
Cited 17 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 2, 2025
Brown, United States Magistrate Judge I. … Mollett v. Leith, 2011 WL 5407359, at *13 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 8, 2011), aff'd sub nom., Mollett v. Leicth, 511 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownKoppers Co. v. American Express Co.
121 F.R.D. 46 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1988
Xerox Corp. v. SCM Corp., 576 F.2d at 1059 . … Defendants have cited the case of Crouse-Hinds Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished404 F. Supp. 2d 858 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 2005
The power to make or adjust assessments on property within school districts and boroughs in Allegheny County lies with the Board of Assessment for Allegheny County. See Leopard Industries Inc., v. … . § 5342 (creating board of assessment for Allegheny County).
Cited 0 timesPublishedJones v. Baskin, Flaherty, Elliot & Mannino, P.C.
738 F. Supp. 937 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 1989
Jones asserts that he did not receive written notice and that the board never voted on his termination, and implies that these procedural defects render the notice ineffective. … In Schier v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 2024
See, e.g., Black v. PA Parole Board, 2019 WL 1714478, at *7 (M.D. Pa. … In Young v. Com.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHOUSTON v. GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 2023
In support of this belief, Plaintiff cites the case of Brown v. Progressive Ins. Co., 860 A.2d 493 (Pa. … (ECF No. 16, at p. 4 (emphasis added), citing Brown, 860 A.2d at 501, quoting Romano v. Nationwide Mut, Fire Ins. Co., 646 A.2d 1228 (Pa. Super. 1994)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownNewcastle Products, Inc. v. School Dist. of Blair Tp.
18 F. Supp. 335 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 1936
statement of claim it is averred that the plaintiff is a corporation of the State of Indiana; that the defendant is a school district located within this district; that on August 2, 1932, the president and secretary of- the board … Such cases as Ogg v. City of Lansing, 35 Iowa, 495 [ 14 Am.Rep. 499 ], and Vanhorn v.
Cited 4 timesPublished456 F. Supp. 298 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 1978
This is not a case where as in Cooiidge v. … Neither is this a case like United States v.
Cited 0 timesPublished194 F. Supp. 128 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1960
All the sentences specified that McClellan may become eligible for parole at such time as the Board of Parole may determine. 18 U.S.C. § 4208 . … Friedman v. United States, 8 Cir., 1952, 200 F.2d 690, 696 ; United States v. Shneer, 3 Cir., 1952, 194 F.2d 598, 600 . I take this opportunity to express my appreciation to Donald C.
Cited 10 timesPublishedWashington County Fire Ins. v. Driscoll
28 F. Supp. 224 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1939
The delivery of the contingent liability notes gradually ceased until 1914, after which year no applicant for insurance filed a premium note except such as were designated by the Board of Directors. … Hoge, 21 How. [35], 64, [ 16 L.Ed. 61 ]; May on Insurance, sect. 548; Mygatt v. New York Protection Ins. Co., 21 N.Y. 52 , and White v. Havens, 20 How.Prac., N.Y., 177.” Schimpf & Son v. Lehigh Valley Mutual Ins.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna