Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspawd

4,323 results

1.32s

  • Fraley v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

    294 F. Supp. 1193 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 1969

    Curtis Brown Co., 260 U.S. 516 , 43 S.Ct. 170 , 67 L.Ed. 372 ), nor are the activities of subsidiary corporations (Peterson v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 205 U.S. 364 , 27 S.Ct. 513 , 51 L.Ed. 841 ; Cannon Mfg. Co. v. … See particularly Robertson v. Railroad Labor Board, 268 U.S. 619, 622 , 45 S.Ct. 621 , 69 L.Ed. 1119 (1925); and Cohens v. Com. of Virginia, 6 Wheat. 264, 428-429 , 5 L.Ed. 257 (1821). . See note 5, supra. .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Teamsters Joint Council 40 (J.C.) v. United States

    238 F. Supp. 301 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 1965

    Justice White in Burlington Truck Lines v. … The other two cases cited by plaintiffs, American Newspaper Publishers Assn. v. National Labor Relations Board, 345 U.S. 100 , 73 S.Ct. 552 , 97 L.Ed. 852 (1953), and National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Chostkov v. City of Pittsburgh

    177 F. 936 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1910

    Ct. 532 ; Barr v. Philadelphia, 191 Pa. 438 , 43 Atl. 335 ; Major v. Aldan Borough, 209 Pa. 247 , 58 Atl. 490 . … This is stated more at length and perhaps more clearly in Keller v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • RANKIN v. PTC GROUP HOLDINGS LLC

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 2023

    United States v. … In Meek v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Makoroff v. City of Lockport, New York (In Re Guterl Special Steel Corp.)

    111 B.R. 107 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 1990

    Lockport and Niagara rely on Maryland National Bank v. … In Equibank, N.A. v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kraynak v. Flemming

    188 F. Supp. 431 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 1960

    Goldman v. Folsom, 3 Cir., 1957, 246 F.2d 776, 778 ; Ferenz v. Folsom, 3 Cir., 1956, 237 F.2d 46 . … National Labor Relations Board, 1951, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 , we “may not substitute [our] inferences for those of the referee which are supported by substantial evidence.” Ferenz v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sullivan v. Finch

    315 F. Supp. 1252 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 1970

    (Tr. 65-77) In May, 1969, she accepted a position as Casework Assistant I with the Butler County Board of Assistance. … IV 2 *1255 In Wright v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • International Union of Electrical Workers v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

    455 F. Supp. 392 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 1978

    See Falsetti v. UMW, 355 F.2d 658 (3d Cir. 1966); Liotta v. Natl Forge Co., CA 78-25 Erie (W.D.Pa. May 22, 1978) and Judge Teitelbaum’s decision in Fannie v. Chamberlin Mfg. … Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hoch v. County of Fayette

    541 F. Supp. 778 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 1982

    Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 573 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2707 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at 573, n.2 , 92 S.Ct. at 2707, n.2 . 7 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Daniels v. Anchor Hocking Corp.

    758 F. Supp. 326 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 27, 1991

    Anderson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, 907 F.2d 1072 , 1075 n. 2 (11th Cir.1990); Brown v. … See *335 Egert v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co., 900 F.2d 1032, 1035 (7th Cir.1990). Anderson v. Blue Cross, supra, 907 F.2d at 1076 quoting Brown v. Blue Cross, 898 F.2d at 1561-62 .

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • COXRY v. LITTLE

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 2, 2025

    Brown, United States Magistrate Judge I. … Mollett v. Leith, 2011 WL 5407359, at *13 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 8, 2011), aff'd sub nom., Mollett v. Leicth, 511 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Koppers Co. v. American Express Co.

    121 F.R.D. 46 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1988

    Xerox Corp. v. SCM Corp., 576 F.2d at 1059 . … Defendants have cited the case of Crouse-Hinds Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Gagliardi v. Kratzenberg

    404 F. Supp. 2d 858 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 2005

    The power to make or adjust assessments on property within school districts and boroughs in Allegheny County lies with the Board of Assessment for Allegheny County. See Leopard Industries Inc., v. … . § 5342 (creating board of assessment for Allegheny County).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Baskin, Flaherty, Elliot & Mannino, P.C.

    738 F. Supp. 937 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 1989

    Jones asserts that he did not receive written notice and that the board never voted on his termination, and implies that these procedural defects render the notice ineffective. … In Schier v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • GOULD v. ADAMS

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 2024

    See, e.g., Black v. PA Parole Board, 2019 WL 1714478, at *7 (M.D. Pa. … In Young v. Com.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • HOUSTON v. GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 2023

    In support of this belief, Plaintiff cites the case of Brown v. Progressive Ins. Co., 860 A.2d 493 (Pa. … (ECF No. 16, at p. 4 (emphasis added), citing Brown, 860 A.2d at 501, quoting Romano v. Nationwide Mut, Fire Ins. Co., 646 A.2d 1228 (Pa. Super. 1994)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Newcastle Products, Inc. v. School Dist. of Blair Tp.

    18 F. Supp. 335 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 1936

    statement of claim it is averred that the plaintiff is a corporation of the State of Indiana; that the defendant is a school district located within this district; that on August 2, 1932, the president and secretary of- the board … Such cases as Ogg v. City of Lansing, 35 Iowa, 495 [ 14 Am.Rep. 499 ], and Vanhorn v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Norman

    456 F. Supp. 298 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 1978

    This is not a case where as in Cooiidge v. … Neither is this a case like United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. McClellan

    194 F. Supp. 128 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1960

    All the sentences specified that McClellan may become eligible for parole at such time as the Board of Parole may determine. 18 U.S.C. § 4208 . … Friedman v. United States, 8 Cir., 1952, 200 F.2d 690, 696 ; United States v. Shneer, 3 Cir., 1952, 194 F.2d 598, 600 . I take this opportunity to express my appreciation to Donald C.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Washington County Fire Ins. v. Driscoll

    28 F. Supp. 224 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1939

    The delivery of the contingent liability notes gradually ceased until 1914, after which year no applicant for insurance filed a premium note except such as were designated by the Board of Directors. … Hoge, 21 How. [35], 64, [ 16 L.Ed. 61 ]; May on Insurance, sect. 548; Mygatt v. New York Protection Ins. Co., 21 N.Y. 52 , and White v. Havens, 20 How.Prac., N.Y., 177.” Schimpf & Son v. Lehigh Valley Mutual Ins.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.