Case law

United States v. 64.88 Acres of Land, more or less, situate in Allegheny County

144 F. Supp. 29 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 1956

In the state court litigation, Gardner v. Allegheny County, supra, the Civil Aeronautics Board and Administrator of Civil Aeronautics filed a brief as amici curiae. … “In U[nited] S[tates] v.

Plumbers & Steamfitters, Local Union 530 Annuity Fund v. Shaffer

457 F. Supp. 954 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1978

Board of Directors of City Trusts, 324 Pa. 545, 550-53 , 188 A. 588 (1936); Grambo v. South Side Bank & Trust Co., 141 Pa.Super. 176 , 14 A.2d 925 (1940); see generally 76 Am.Jur.2d Trusts, §§ 279-290 (1978 Supp.). … *956 Westmoreland Finance Corp., 394 Pa. 552 , 147 A.2d 392 (1958) (minutes of meeting of board of directors); Hartley v.

Plouse v. Richardson

334 F. Supp. 1086 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 1971

See also Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). … Bujnovsky v. Celebrezze, 343 F.2d 868 (3d Cir. 1965).

Coleman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

319 F. Supp. 2d 544 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 2003

Fort Washington Resources, Inc., v. Tannen, 858 F.Supp. 455, 459 (E.D.Pa.1994) (citing Browne v. Maxfield, 663 F.Supp. 1193, 1202 (E.D.Pa.1987)). … Browne, 663 F.Supp. at 1202 . Under Anderson v.

Tonkin v. United States

56 F. Supp. 817 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1944

V. … Counsel for the plaintiffs has cited a case recently decided by the United States Board of Tax Appeals, Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company and Ora E. Dundore, Executors, v.

WILSON v. GALLAHER

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 28, 2025

See Drumgo v. Funk, No. 3:20-CV-01829, 2023 WL 2287727, at *4 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 26, 2023), report and recommendation adopted, No. 3:20-CV-01829, 2023 WL 2249972 (M.D. Pa. … Reilly v. City of Harrisburg, 858 F.3d 173, 176 (3d Cir. 2017) (cleaned up). If the moving party does not establish either of the first two factors, they are not entitled to injunctive relief.

Englert v. City of McKeesport

564 F. Supp. 375 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 7, 1983

E.g., McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, 444 U.S. 232 , 100 S.Ct. 502 , 62 L.Ed.2d 441 (1980); Evans v. S.S. Kresge Co., 544 F.2d 1184 (3d Cir.1976). … MarFarr Corp. v. Copley Press Inc., 64 F.R.D. 456 (D.Ill.1974).

Feather v. United Mine Workers of America

494 F. Supp. 701 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1980

The Board’s decision will be enforced, for as this court stated in A. Duie Pyle, Inc. v. … Consolidated Express, Inc., 221 NLRB No. 144 (1975) and the Second Circuit enforced the Board’s order. International Longshoremen’s Association v.

HOBSON

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 27, 2026

Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). … See Weiler v. Overmyer, Civ. A. No. 21-303, 2024 WL 3327771 (W.D. Pa. 2024) (collecting cases). Petitioner challenges the Board’s September 9, 2024, decision.

Davis v. United States

277 F. Supp. 602 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1967

In Cleveland v. … In United States v.

Zurco, Inc. v. Sloan Valve Co.

785 F. Supp. 2d 476 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2011

Browne Drug Co., 538 F.3d at 191 (quoting A.J. Canfield Co. v. Honickman, 808 F.2d 291, 296 (3rd Cir.1986)) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). … Browne Drug Co. v. Cococare Products, Inc., 538 F.3d 185, 199 (3rd Cir.2008). Once a descriptive mark has acquired such distinctiveness, also known as “secondary meaning,” it becomes eligible for protection.

M. Leff Radio Parts, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc.

706 F. Supp. 387 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 1988

Lesnefsky v. Fischer & Porter Co., 527 F.Supp. 951, 957 (E.D.Pa.1981); Wright v. Federal Machine Co., Inc., 535 F.Supp. 645, 650 (E.D.Pa.1982); Sessa v. … The report was presented at the Board’s regularly scheduled meeting on February 2, 1984. The report recommended that Mattel sell Intellivision; at that point, and not before, the Board decided to sell Intellivision.

Richard C. v. Houstoun

196 F.R.D. 288 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 1999

Kleissler v. United States Forest Serv., 157 F.3d 964, 969 (3d Cir.1998) (citations omitted). “Although these requirements are intertwined, each must be met to support intervention as of right.” Harris v. … See Pansy v.

84 Lumber Co. v. MRK Technologies, Ltd.

145 F. Supp. 2d 675 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 30, 2001

Franchise Tax Board of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 27-28 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). … The plaintiff also refers us to Cover v.

United States ex rel. Huggins v. Commonwealth

109 F. Supp. 702 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 1953

Kinsella v. Board of Trustees, 340 Pa. 497 , 17 A.2d 882 . … Dunn v. Lyons, 5 Cir., 23 F.2d 14 ; United States ex rel. Smith v. Baldi, 3 Cir., 192 F.2d 540 ; United States ex rel. MacBlain v. Burke, U. S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 200 F.2d 616 .

Saint Vincent Health Center v. Shalala

937 F. Supp. 496 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 1995

Consequently, the Board finds that it does not have jurisdiction over the reopening determination and hereby dismisses this issue from the case. … After all the issues before the Board have been concluded, you may request review of this determination. Amended Complaint at ¶57; Ex. K to Amended Complaint at 1.

Knoell v. United States

236 F. Supp. 299 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 1964

Jones, chairman of the Board of Commissioners of Penn Hills Township, who testified that had a request for a zoning change from residential to commercial been made prior to Mrs. … The law of this circuit is clear as laid down in United States v. 13,255.53 Acres of Land, etc., 158 F.2d 874, 876 (3rd Cir. 1946), where the Court held that if a man is to qualify as an expert witness he has to have actual

Gant v. Aliquippa Borough

612 F. Supp. 1139 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 10, 1985

See Brown v. Fairleigh Dickenson Univ., 560 F.Supp. 391, 405-6 (fn. 5) (D.N.J.1983). The Borough is a “person” subject to Section 1983 claims; it may be assumed that it is a “person” subject to Section 1985(3) claims. … Leonard v. Argento, 699 F.2d 874 (7th Cir.1983); Turpin v. Mailet, 619 F.2d 196 (2d Cir.1980); Herrera v. Valentine, 653 F.2d 1220 (8th Cir.1981). This is not susceptible of summary judgment. *1143 (b) The 1983 claim.

Monti v. Flaherty

351 F. Supp. 1136 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1972

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Kiekow v. Village of Chenequa, supra.

Bowles v. Vance

64 F. Supp. 647 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 26, 1946

In the Bowles v. … Brown v. Hecht Co., 78 U.S. App.D.C. 98, 137 F.2d 689, 695 ; Henderson v. C. Thomas Stores, D.C., 48 F.Supp. 295, 301 .