Case law

United States v. Lumber Institute of Allegheny County

35 F. Supp. 191 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 30, 1940

This view is supported by Loewe v. Lawlor, 208 U.S. 274 , 28 S.Ct. 301 , 52 L.Ed. 488 , 13 Ann.Cas. 815; Duplex Printing Press Co. v. … Deering, 254 U.S. 443 , 41 S.Ct. 172 , 65 L.Ed. 349 , 16 A.L.R. 196 ; United States v. Brims, 272 U.S. 549 , 47 S.Ct. 169 , 71 L.Ed. 403 ; Bedford Cut Stone Company v.

United States Ex Rel. Singh v. Bradford Regional Medical Center

752 F. Supp. 2d 602 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 2010

The V & S Defendants did not see a copy of the internal summaries regarding the Sublease that were prepared for the BRMC Board of Directors. … Leonhardt had to obtain Board approval. (Leonhardt Dep. at 66-67.) As part of his presentation to the Board seeking approval for the Equipment Sublease, Mr.

Isaly Dairy Co. v. United Dairy Farmers

250 F. Supp. 99 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 1966

United States v. Colgate & Co., 250 U.S. 300, 307 , 39 S.Ct. 465 , 63 L.Ed. 992 (1919); Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. … Y., 291 U.S. 502, 538 , 54 S.Ct. 505 , 78 L.Ed. 940 (1934); Milk Control Board of Pennsylvania v. Eisenberg Farm Products, 306 U.S. 346, 350 , 59 S.Ct. 528 , 83 L.Ed. 752 (1939); United States v.

Hoots v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

545 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 1981

We rejected the upgrade plan which did essentially nothing to achieve desegregation and also we determined the Milliken v. … If approved by such court the Clerk thereof shall be immediately certify the regional boundaries contained therein to the County Board of Elections.

COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA v. Derry Const. Co.

617 F. Supp. 940 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 18, 1985

This court has had occasion to address this problem before in the case of Chambers Development Co. v. Browning-Ferris Industries, 590 F.Supp. 1528 (W.D.Pa. 1984). … [and] the identity of the person making the misrepresentation Id., citing Eaby v. Richmond, 561 F.Supp. 131 (E.D.Pa.1983) quoting Bennett v. Berg, 685 F.2d 1053 (8th Cir.1982).

United States Ex Rel. Thompson v. Dye

103 F. Supp. 776 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1952

See Moore v. Dempsey, 1923, 261 U.S. 86 , 43 S.Ct. 265 , 67 L.Ed. 543 ; Powell v. Alabama, footnote 5, supra; Brown v. Mississippi, 1936, 297 U.S. 278 , 56 S.Ct. 461 , 80 L.Ed. 682 ; Diggs v. … And in Hudspeth v.

Taylor Milk Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

988 F. Supp. 881 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 5, 1997

Co. v. United Bhd. of Carpenters, 90 F.3d 1318, 1330 (8th Cir.1996); accord Brown & Root, Inc. v. Louisiana State AFL—CIO, 10 F.3d 316, 320 (5th Cir.1994). … Brown & Root, 10 F.3d at 320 . I turn now to the application of that test to the facts of this ease. IV. A.

Napa Pittsburgh, Inc. v. Automotive Chauffeurs, Parts & Garage Employees, Local Union No. 926

363 F. Supp. 54 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1973

This agreement was approved August 30, 1973 by the Regional Director of Region 6 of the National Labor Relations Board. … U., L.7-P v.

Victoria Station, Inc. v. Clarefield, Inc.

458 F. Supp. 199 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 19, 1978

Telechron, Inc. v. Telicon Corp., 198 F.2d 903, 909 (3d Cir. 1952); Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Kasser Distillers Products, supra. 7. … Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Bros. Co., 240 U.S. 251 , 36 S.Ct. 269 , 60 L.Ed. 629 (1916). 15.

Besaganahalli v. United States Department of Justice, Immigration & Naturalization Service

442 F. Supp. 60 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1977

Both plaintiffs waived their right to appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals. The plaintiffs were represented by' counsel at that hearing. … Acosta v. Gaffney, 558 F.2d 1153 , C.A. 3, 1977.

United States v. Ruse

112 F. Supp. 667 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 9, 1953

Potter v. United States, 155 U.S. 438 , 15 S.Ct. 144 , 39 L.Ed. 214 ; Taran v. United States, 8 Cir., 88 F.2d 54 ; Led-better v. United States, 170 U.S. 606, 607 , 18 S.Ct. 774 , 42 L.Ed. 1162 . … Woolley v. United States, 9 Cir., 97 F.2d 258 ; United States v. Shindler, D.C., 13 F.R.D. 292 ; United States v. Krepper, 3 Cir., 159 F.2d 958 . An appropriate Order is entered.

Eazor Express, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

357 F. Supp. 158 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 1973

The authority for the National Committee originated with a resolution of the Executive Board of the International. … See The Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, 398 U.S. 235 , 90 S.Ct. 1583 , 26 L.Ed.2d 199 (1970). 11 . See The Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, supra, n. 10; United Steelworkers of America v.

Zezulewicz v. Port Authority of Allegheny County

290 F. Supp. 2d 583 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 2003

Robb v. City of Philadelphia, 733 F.2d 286, 293 (3d Cir.1984) (citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-70 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)). … Brown v. Philip Morris, Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 805 (3d Cir.2001). We agree with the defendant that plaintiffs § 1985 claim must fail because she has failed to show discriminatory animus.

Finnie v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.

97 F. Supp. 721 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 1951

For other cases stating that repairmen working under temporary local conditions were not members of the crew, see Carumbo v. Cape Cod S. S. Co., 1 Cir., 1941, 123 F.2d 991 ; Maryland Casualty Co. v. … Lawson, 5 Cir., 1938, 94 F.2d 190 ; Taylor v. McManigal, 6 Cir., 1937, 89 F.2d 583 . Plaintiff cites the “twilight zone" doctrine enunciated in Davis v.

DUNBAR v. SCOTT

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 5, 2025

Brightwell v. Lehman, 637 F.3d 187, 193 n.7 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Siers v. Morrash, 700 F.2d 113, 116 (3d Cir. 1983). See also EEOC v. … Brown Christopher B. Brown United States Magistrate Judge cc: DYLAN P.

VAN

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 2026

Brown, United States Magistrate Judge I. … See Rodney v. Mukasey, 340 F.

Panza v. Armco Steel Corporation

208 F. Supp. 50 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 22, 1962

Union, Local 44, v. Viking Equipment Co., 278 F.2d 142 (3 Cir.); Zdanok v. Glidden Co., 288 F.2d 99 (2 Cir.). … Zdanok v. Glidden Company, supra; Oddie v. Ross Gear & Tool Co., (6 Cir.),. 305 F.2d 143 .

FERRARI

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 2025

Dewey v. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, 558 F. App'x 191, 198, n. 6 (3d Cir. 2014). See also DLCA, LLC v. Balance Point Divorce Funding, LLC, No. 2:18-CV-01867, 2018 WL 4676045, at *1 (D.N.J. … Brown Christopher B. Brown United States Magistrate Judge CC: All counsel of record, via ECF

WHITEHEAD

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 2025

Brown ) PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. … Tabron v. Grace, 6 F.3d 147, 155 (3d Cir. 1993).

CLAYTON v. DOLLAR BANK

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 2021

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Board”) provided commentary in adopting Regulation J. … Gunn v. Minton, 133 S. Ct. 1059, 1065 (2013). The Grable doctrine has been described as “narrow and unusual.” Brown v. Organon USA, Inc., No. 07-3092, 2008 WL 2625355, at *4 (D.N.J. June 27, 2008).