Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspawd

4,323 results

1.52s

  • Bendorf v. McCormick

    674 F. Supp. 15 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 1987

    Sweet v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 457 Pa. 456 , 322 A.2d 362 (1974). … Commonwealth ex rel Bradley v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 479 Pa. 440 , 388 A.2d 736 (1978), Beckert, supra. The present case presents the same problem identified in Eshelman .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Yellow Cab Co. of Pittsburgh v. Gasper

    994 F. Supp. 344 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 9, 1998

    See, e.g., McKinney v. Board of Trustees of Mayland Comm. … Co., 873 F.2d 1249, 1254-55 (9th Cir.1989); Getty Oil Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 841 F.2d 1254, 1262-63 (5th Cir.1988); Brown v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Reich v. Beharry

    686 F. Supp. 533 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 24, 1988

    After consideration of the motion and briefs, we conclude that under Parratt v. … Plaintiff cites Flaherty v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • BLYE

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2026

    See, e.g., Hudson v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Prob. and Parole, 204 A.3d 392, 395 (Pa. 2019). Whether to grant him parole is a decision left to the sole discretion of the Board. 61 Pa. Cons. … The Court is “not authorized by the due process clause to second-guess parole boards and the requirements of substantive due process are met if [the Board had] some basis for [its] challenged decision.” Coady v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mamula v. Local 1211, United Steelworkers of America

    202 F. Supp. 348 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 1962

    On January 10, 1962, the International Executive Board reversed the local union’s imposition of a fine and suspension. … Krieger v. Ownership Corp., 270 F.2d 265 , 3rd Cir.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • DIGIACOBBE v. BROTHERS

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 22, 2025

    Brown v Pennsylvania, No. 23- 5092, 2023 WL 6379041 (U.S. Oct. 2, 2023). It is worth quoting Carmen v. S.F. Unified Sch. … [citing and quoting Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1114 (3d Cir.1989)] Or, as the Supreme Court stated in Board of County Commissioners of Bryan County v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Crookham v. Muick

    246 F. Supp. 288 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1965

    Leith v. Oil Transport Co., 321 F.2d 591, 593 (C.A.3, 1963); Panama R.R. Co. v. Johnson, 264 U.S. 375, 385 , 44 S.Ct. 391 , 68 L.Ed. 748 (1924). … Nor does the venue provision of the Jones Act apply in admiralty ( 321 F.2d at 593 ; Brown v. C. D. Mallory & Co., 122 F.2d 98, 103-104 (C.C.A.3, 1941).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hornick v. Internal Revenue Service

    252 B.R. 897 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 25, 2000

    In re Brown, 951 F.2d 564 (3d Cir.1991). … The 220 Partnership v. Eisenberg, 1991 WL 61160 (E.D.Pa.1991); Zimmerman v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Underfeed Stoker Co. of America v. Westinghouse Mach. Co.

    214 F. 587 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 1914

    In Underfeed Stoker Co. of America v. … The patent in suit was also held valid by Judge Brown, sitting in the District Court for Massachusetts in Underfeed Stoker Co. of America v. Riley, 207 *588 Fed. 963 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • WINGATE

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 14, 2026

    Wingate asserts five grounds for relief, as outlined by Magistrate Judge Brown in his Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 1; ECF No. 16, pp. 8-9). … Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Goodwin v. City of Pittsburgh

    480 F. Supp. 627 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1979

    Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney, 439 U.S. 24 , 99 S.Ct. 295 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978). … Healthy City Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 287 , 97 S.Ct. *635 568, 576, 50 L.Ed.2d 471, 484 (1977). See also Givhan v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Layshock Ex Rel. Layshock v. Hermitage School District

    496 F. Supp. 2d 587 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 10, 2007

    In Klein v. … In C.N. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • HENNESSEY v. DOLLAR BANK, FSB

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 2019

    Matczak v. … Krouse v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gentile v. Gardner

    298 F. Supp. 1401 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 26, 1969

    National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951), we “may not substitute * * * [our] inferences for those of the referee which are supported by substantial evidence.” Ferenz v. … v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ciaffoni v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

    550 F. Supp. 1246 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 15, 1982

    See Murphy v. Hunt, *1250 455 U.S. 478 , 102 S.Ct. 1181 , 71 L.Ed.2d 353 (1982). … The Court stated: Younger v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • ARRINGTON

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 2026

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Jd. at *2 (citing Florence v. Bd. Of Chosen Freeholders of Cnty. Of Burlington, 566 U.S. 318 (2012); Parkell v. Danberg, 833 F.3d 313, 327-30 (3d Cir. 2016)); see also Gorrio v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp. v. United States

    27 F. Supp. 227 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 1939

    During this period, six meetings of the board of directors of the taxpayer were held, at which certain changes in the books of account were authorized, a director was elected, and the sales of stock were ratified. … See also our opinion this day filed in two suits by the Federal Coke Corporation v. Driscoll, Federal Coke Corporation v. U. S., 27 F.Supp. 224 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Baskin Flaherty Elliott & Mannino, P.C.

    788 F. Supp. 878 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 1992

    Mackey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc., 486 U.S. 825 , 108 S.Ct. 2182 , 100 L.Ed.2d 836 (1988); Fort Halifax Packing Co., Inc. v. … At that time, the court also permitted plaintiff to add two counts against three members of the board of directors of Baskin Flaherty.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • ADDISON v. BOOHER

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 2025

    V. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In re Franks

    49 F.2d 389 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 5, 1931

    In MacIntyre v. … As to effect given MacIntyre v. Kavanaugh, supra, see Rogers Brown & Co. v. Tindel Morris Co. (D. C.) 271 E. 475; In the Matter of John Brier, Bankrupt (D. C.) 3 F.(2d) 709 , 5 A. B. R. (N. S.) 756.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.