Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspawd

4,323 results

1.38s

  • Hoots v. Pennsylvania

    535 F. Supp. 1194 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1982

    The district court may enjoin a state or school board action which hinders or impedes the effectiveness of a remedy ordered to vindicate constitu *1197 tional deprivations. United States v. … Scotland Neck City Board of Education, 407 U.S. 484 , 92 S.Ct. 2214 , 33 L.Ed.2d 75 (1972); North Carolina Board of Education v. Swann, 402 U.S. 43 , 91 S.Ct. 1284 , 28 L.Ed.2d 586 (1971); see also Griffin v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. McCrackin-Sturman Ford, Inc.

    381 F. Supp. 153 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 23, 1974

    . § 1604 , the Federal Reserve Board promulgated § 226.8(b)(4) of Regulation Z, which sets forth the same disclosure requirement: “(b) In any transaction subject to this section, the following items, as applicable, shall … The only case dealing directly with the question of whether an acceleration clause is the type of disclosure required by the Act is Garza v.

    Reversed by William Johnson and Joan Johnson, His Wife, and Cross-Appellees v. McCrackin Ford, Inc., and Ford Motor Credit Company, Inc., and Cross-Appellants, 527 F.2d 257 (1975)Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Willow Crossing Dairy Farm, Inc. v. Hardin

    327 F. Supp. 798 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 28, 1970

    In Switchmen’s Union of North America v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Cheney Cal. Lumber Co., 327 U.S. 385, 388 , 66 S.Ct. 553, 554 , 90 L.Ed. 739 (1946).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Viola v. A. & E TELEVISON NETWORKS

    433 F. Supp. 2d 613 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 7, 2006

    The Program explored the theories set forth in Dan Brown’s best selling and controversial novel, The DdVinci Code, which suggests that Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene were married and had children creating a lineage that … by parental guidance. 3 Plaintiff, who claims he is the founder of the Anti Roman Catholic Defamation League, filed the instant complaint on December 29, 2005, bringing claims against A & E, the alleged Chairman of the Board

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • O'Dell v. Department of Public Welfare of Penn.

    346 F. Supp. 2d 774 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 2004

    Gigliotti discussed the Plaintiffs circumstances with the Board. Id. … Airways, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hodnik v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

    54 F.R.D. 184 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1972

    They contend that Buhl Bridge, from which the minor plaintiff jumped, was a railroad-owned trestle which the defendant actually knew was frequently used as a diving or jumping board for over thirty years. … McSparran v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, 258 F.Supp. 130 (D.C.E.D.Pa.1966). See also Chambers v. Montgomery, supra; Hughes v. Babcock, 349 Pa. 475 , 37 A.2d 551 (1944); and Focht v. Rabada, supra.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Hudak v. Times Pub. Co., Inc.

    534 F. Supp. 2d 546 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 2008

    Norton v. … Lewis v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United Mine Workers of America Interational Union v. G.M. & W. Coal Co.

    642 F. Supp. 57 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 1985

    Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). … See, for example, Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive Board, 417 U.S. 249 , 94 S.Ct. 2236 , 41 L.Ed.2d 46 (1974); American Bell Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Burney v. Housing Authority of County of Beaver

    551 F. Supp. 746 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 20, 1982

    See Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 24 , 91 S.Ct. 1267, 1280 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971); Dayton Board of Education v. … See also Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler, 427 U.S. 424 , 96 S.Ct. 2697 , 49 L.Ed.2d 599 (1976).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Porter v. Elliott

    5 F.R.D. 223 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1946

    Bowles v. Swift & Co., D.C., 56 F.Supp. 679 ; Swift & Co. v. United States, 276 U.S. 311 , 48 S.Ct. 311 , 72 L.Ed. 587 ; Walling v. Shenandoah Dives M. Co., 10 Cir., 134 F.2d 395 ; Bowles v. … Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp., 7 Cir., 149 F.2d 545 ; Brown v. Conner, D.C., 63 F.Supp. 315 ; and Bowles v. Hall and Bowles v. Holliday, D.C., 62 F.Supp. 486 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States ex rel. Ackerman v. Johnston

    139 F. Supp. 890 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 1955

    As said in Brown v. … v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Peerless Oil & Gas Co. v. Heiner

    12 F. Supp. 232 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 1935

    This board’s appraisal placed a valuation on the property of $262,225 as of December 12, 1927. … Fairless v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 67 F.(2d) 475 ; Duffin v. Lucas (C. C. A.) 55 F. (2d) 786; Commissioner v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co. (C. C. A.) 59 F.(2d) 320 ; Domhoff & Joyce Co. v. Commissioner (C. C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pless v. CPC International, Inc.

    82 F.R.D. 105 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 1979

    Brown, the manager of Commercial’s branch office in Ligonier, Pennsylvania, whereby Pless forged his mother’s signature on the above-mentioned stock powers and Brown, in his capacity as branch manager, affixed Commercial’ … In Flying Diamond Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • AMCO Insurance v. Emery & Associates, Inc.

    926 F. Supp. 2d 634 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 2013

    Specifically, AMCO contends Defendants: (1) used oriented strand board (“OSB”) instead of fire retardant treated (“FRT”) wood for structural members as required by the 1993 BOCA Code and the FPA; (2) failed to provide an … Farabaugh v. Pa. Turnpike Comm’n, 590 Pa. 46 , 911 A.2d 1264, 1283 (Pa.2006). Further, the question of whether a duty exists is “purely a question of law.” Brown v. Pa.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Cohen

    295 F. Supp. 1302 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 11, 1969

    National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951), we “may not substitute * * * [our] inferences for those of the referee which are supported by substantial evidence.” Ferenz v. … v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re Pittsburgh Rys. Co.

    113 F. Supp. 233 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 1953

    Margiotti v. Cunningham, 337 Pa. 289, 305 , 10 A.2d 559 ; Turco Paint & Varnish Co. v. Kalodner, 320 Pa. 421, 436 , 184 A. 37 . … Dougherty, Trustee, Appellant, v. Philadelphia, supra.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp. v. United States

    27 F. Supp. 227 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 1939

    During this period, six meetings of the board of directors of the taxpayer were held, at which certain changes in the books of account were authorized, a director was elected, and the sales of stock were ratified. … See also our opinion this day filed in two suits by the Federal Coke Corporation v. Driscoll, Federal Coke Corporation v. U. S., 27 F.Supp. 224 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • BAYNES v. SANTANDER CONSUMER USA

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 2019

    Abbott, 164 F.3d at 146 (citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569, 92 S. Ct. 2701, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)). … Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997); Bell v. City of Phila., 629 F. App’x. 214, 216 (3d Cir. 2015).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ascheim v. Quinlan

    314 F. Supp. 685 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 1970

    See Urbano v. Board of Managers of New Jersey State Prison, 415 F.2d 247 (3d Cir. 1969). … Urbano v. Board of Managers of New Jersey State Prison, supra, at 255-256 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • YOCCA

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 2026

    Brown, United States Magistrate Judge I. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.