Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

0.44s

  • Eckrich v. DiNardo

    283 Pa. Super. 84 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 5, 1980

    Brown & Zortman v. Pittsburgh, 375 Pa. 250 , 100 A.2d 98 (1953); Seligson v. Young, 189 Pa.Super. 510 , 151 A.2d 792 (1959). … See generally National Building Leasing, Inc. v. Byler, 252 Pa.Super. 370, 372 , 381 A.2d 963, 964 (1977). In Shane v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    209 A.3d 1034 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 1, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Brown

    168 A.3d 358 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Brown

    168 A.3d 358 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Brown

    168 A.3d 358 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Brown

    206 Pa. Super. 439 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 1965

    Fell v. Brown, 100 Pa. Superior Ct. 353 . Experience has shown that generally a child’s welfare is best promoted by entrusting its future to its parents. … Brown v. Lane, 90 Pa. Superior Ct. 350, 352 ; Com. ex rel., Appellant, v. Tyrrell, 115 Pa. Superior Ct. 385, 386, 387 , 175 A. 723 ; Com. ex rel. Conway v. Preston, 148 Pa. Superior Ct. 182, 186 , 24 A. 2d 772 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    121 Pa. Super. 74 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 1935

    As stated in Davis v. Davis, 91 Pa. Superior Ct. 354 , “The sexual act is seldom performed in thé presence of eye witnesses. Adultery is in most cases established by circumstantial evidence.”

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    433 Pa. Super. 577 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 17, 1994

    Brown filed her appeal on October 15, 1993, challenging the validity of the post-nuptial agreement. Mrs. Brown’s appeal was untimely; therefore, this court has no jurisdiction to hear this appeal. See Fried v. … Brown filed her appeal from the order denying post-trial motions. Her appeal, therefore, was untimely. See Pa.R.A.P. 903(a). Prior to this court’s decision in Flowers v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    447 Pa. Super. 424 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 1995

    Brown v. Brown, 442 Pa.Super. 638 , 659 A.2d 1 (1995) (slip opinion at 1-3) (citations to record omitted). Wife appealed from that order. … See Zollars v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    281 Pa. Super. 283 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1980

    She sought a divorce from bed and board with alimony, counsel fees and costs. On April 4, 1979 Plaintiff Richard Tulp Brown filed a request to discontinue his Complaint in Divorce and President Judge D. T. … (Footnotes omitted) A similar factual situation was before us in Quattrone v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    163 Pa. Super. 490 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1948

    Brown, appellee, instituted this action in divorce against his wife, Martha I. Brown, appellant, charging (1) cruel and barbarous treatment and (2) indignities to the person. … Superior Ct. 506, 508 , 58 A. 2d 372 ; Keller v. Keller, 160 Pa. Superior Ct. 480, 483 , 52 A. 2d 373 ; Smith v. Smith, 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 582 , 43 A. 2d 371, 372 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    164 Pa. Super. 350 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1948

    Title was taken in the name of June Brown, the plaintiff-appellant, a daughter of Joseph Brown by a former marriage. … Ellen June Brown.” A notice to vacate demised premises, to be effective, must be positive, decisive and free from ambiguity. Fotterall v. Armour, 218 Pa. 73 , 66 A. 1001 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    124 Pa. Super. 237 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1936

    Brown brought an action for absolute divorce against his wife, Helen R. … This constituted a course of conduct and not having been provoked by the husband constituted indignities as that phrase is used in the Divorce Act: Sharp v. Sharp, 106 Pa. Super. 33 , 35 , 161 A. 453 ; Kett v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    996 A.2d 533 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 2010

    996 A.2d 533 (2010) BROWN v. BROWN. No. 433 WDA 2008. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. March 12, 2010. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    972 A.2d 547 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 2009

    972 A.2d 547 (2009) BROWN v. BROWN. No. 26 WDA 2008. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. March 11, 2009. Vacated and Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    974 A.2d 1174 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 2009

    974 A.2d 1174 (2009) BROWN v. BROWN. No. 821 MDA 2008. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. April 29, 2009. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    929 A.2d 232 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 11, 2007

    929 A.2d 232 (2007) BROWN v. BROWN. No. 1275 WDA 2006. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. May 11, 2007. Remanded.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    288 Pa. Super. 354 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1981

    As we reiterated in Howard v. … Finally, Jean Lewniczak testified that she was at the Brown’s residence over a course of many years at least once or twice a week, that the appellee’s physical condition was dirty and “unkempt” (T. 167).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    245 Pa. Super. 584 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1977

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    240 Pa. Super. 702 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 13, 1976

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.