Case law

Whitehead v. Whitehead

224 Pa. Super. 303 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 14, 1973

In Berezin v. Berezin, 186 Pa. Superior Ct. 340, 346 , 142 A.2d 741, 744 , allocatur refused, 186 Pa. … And in Boddie v.

Commonwealth v. Bullers

410 Pa. Super. 176 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1991

Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 95 Pa.Commw. 132, 135, 504 A.2d 437, 439 (1986), quoting Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 64 Pa.Commw. 525, 532, 441 A.2d 470, 475 (1982). … Commonwealth v.

In The Interest of: K.L., a Minor

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 2016

DHS presented the testimony of Jamilla Brown, the DHS sex abuse investigator, who testified that, upon investigation, the allegations against Appellant were unfounded. … Commonwealth v. Castillo, 888 A.2d 775, 780 (Pa. 2005) (quoting Commonwealth v. Lord, 719 A.2d 306, 309 (Pa. 1998)). Rule 1925 waiver standards apply in the family law context. See In re L.M., 923 A.2d 505 (Pa.

Com. v. Sheed, E.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 11, 2018

Brown. In Ms. … See Commonwealth v. Johnson, 51 A.3d 237 (Pa.

Commonwealth v. Grosso

448 Pa. Super. 552 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 27, 1996

Commonwealth v. Stine, 372 Pa.Super. 312, 314 , 539 A.2d 454, 455 (1988), citing Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 439 Pa.Super. 516, 527 , 654 A.2d 1096,1102 (1995). See: Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 , 98 S.Ct. 330 , 54 L.Ed.2d 331 (1977).

In Re Adoption of M.E.T.

313 Pa. Super. 316 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1983

Santosky v. Kramer, supra. … The majority then expressly disavowed the recent holding in Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Thomas

2002 Pa. Super. 419 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 2002

As evidence in a hearing held before a fact finding board (the Board of Claims) PennDOT produced a copy of the letter found in their office file. … Co. v.

Commonwealth v. Mickens

409 Pa. Super. 266 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1991

Shortly thereafter, Detective Jack Azpell observed the Defendant (consistent with the description given by CI-1) meet with Co-Defendant MacNamee and deliver to Co-Defendant MacNamee items in a brown paper bag. … As officers approached the vehicle, the very strong odor of PCP emanated from within the vehicle, both MacNamee and Mango were removed from the car and a brown paper bag was observed on the passenger side floor.

Commonwealth v. BRESLIN

194 Pa. Super. 83 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1960

Henwood and Arney v. Commonwealth, 52 Pa. 424 ; Commonwealth v. Quinn, 42 Pa. Superior Ct. 490 ; Commonwealth ex rel. Scasserra v. Keenan, 175 Pa. Superior Ct. 636 , 106 A. 2d 843 . … Commonwealth v. Thurman, 167 Pa. Superior Ct. 642 , 76 A. 2d 483 ; Commonwealth v. Edelman, 162 Pa. Superior Ct. 313 , 57 A. 2d 603 ; Commonwealth v. Wojdakowski, 161 Pa.

Nicholas, J. v. Hofmann, D.

2017 Pa. Super. 77 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 2017

Corp. v. … Long v. Brown, 582 A.2d 359, 363 (Pa. Super. 1990); see also Krizovensky v. Krizovensky, 624 A.2d 638, 643 (Pa. Super.)

Com. v. Hopper, J.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 2022

Prevailing case law, particularly Commonwealth v. Brown, 240 A.3d 970 (Pa. Super. 2020), refutes this argument. … In Commonwealth v. Brown, 240 A.3d 970 (Pa.

Com. v. Moore, K.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 2017

Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Hughes, 865 A.2d 761, 793 (Pa. 2004); see also Commonwealth v.

In re McKinney

67 A.3d 824 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 21, 2013

Green, 289 P.3d 428 (Utah 2012); Davis v. U.S. Bank Nat. Ass’n, 243 S.W.3d 425 (Mo.Ct.App.2007); In re Fleet Nat. Bank’s Appeal from Probate, 267 Conn. 229 , 837 A.2d 785 (2004); Fleet Bank v. Foote, No. … See Branham v. Rohm & Haas Co., 19 A.3d 1094, 1107 (Pa.Super.2011) appeal denied, 615 Pa. 771 , 42 A.3d 289 (2012).

Com. v. Shaw, S.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 30, 2025

§ 9545(d)(1)(i)-(iii), Pa.R.Crim.P. 902(A)(14), (A)(15), and (D), Commonwealth v. Brown, 767 A.2d 576, 583 (Pa.Super. 2001), and Commonwealth v. … Brown, 767 A.2d at 583.

Heitzman-Nolte v. Nolte

2003 Pa. Super. 435 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2003

Geiger v. Rouse, 715 A.2d 454, 458 (Pa.Super.1998), appeal denied, 1999 WL 112220 , 1999 Pa. Lexis 554 (Pa.1999); Crawford v. Crawford, 429 Pa.Super. 540 , 633 A.2d 155 (1993); Hanson v. … Verna v.

Alexander v. Zerbe Township Poor District

63 Pa. Super. 356 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 1916

In Danville Hospital v. … The same principle was held to be sound in Oakland Township v. Martin, 104 Pa. 303 ; Harshman v. Dunbar Township, 11 Pa. Superior Ct. 638 , and many other cases.

Berry v. Pittsburg Railways Co.

55 Pa. Super. 289 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 1913

In Peirson v. … See also Brown v. Montgomery, 21 Pa. Superior Ct. 262 ; Renn v. Tallman, 25 Pa. Superior Ct. 503 . The first assignment of error is sustained. *297 We also think there is merit in the second assignment.

Friedman v. Friedman

224 Pa. Super. 530 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 14, 1973

After a separation, and at the instance of the father, the Juvenile Court of Buncombe County, N.C., placed the children in a boarding house for their care. … Bryant v. Hendrick, 444 Pa. 83 , 280 A. 2d 110 (1971) ; Holsey v. Trevillo, 6 Watts 402 (1837). The lower court had no authority to grant appellee relief with respect to personalty on the basis of his Petition,

Albright v. Fagan

448 Pa. Super. 395 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 1996

Somerset Community Hospital, 205 Pa.Super. 419 , 211 A.2d 49 (1965); Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. L.L. Stearns & Sons, 20 Pa.Cmwlth. 244, 250 , 341 A.2d 543, 546 (1975). Compare: Biddle v. W.C.A.B. … Epler v. North American Rockwell Corp., supra at 397, 393 A.2d at 1166 ; Motion Control Ind. v. W.C.A.B. (Buck), supra; Newhouse v. W.C.A.B. (Harris Cleaning Service, Inc.), supra.

Forester v. Teutonia Fire Insurance

60 Pa. Super. 151 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 1915

After leaving word with a person with whom the plaintiff had boarded for the latter to meet him the following day at Olean, the adjuster went away. … Co. v.