Case law

Cox v. Cox

187 Pa. Super. 177 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1958

Brady v. Brady, 168 Pa. Superior Ct. 538 , 79 A. 2d 803 ; Morgan v. Morgan, 182 Pa. Superior Ct. 182 , 126 A. 2d 805 . In Albrecht v. Albrecht, 175 Pa. … Campana v. Campana, 186 Pa. Superior Ct. 472 , 142 A. 2d 169 ; Rothman v. Rothman, 180 Pa. Superior Ct. 421 , 119 A. 2d 584 .

Healey v. Carey, Baxter & Kennedy, Inc.

144 Pa. Super. 500 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1941

The referee and the board found the Carey company alone liable and made an award accordingly. … Byrne v.

White v. Black

14 Pa. Super. 459 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 1900

In Drinker v. … See Brown v. Moorhead, 8 S. & R. 569; and is founded merely on presumption, which may, as I apprehend, be rebutted by circumstances or parol evidence.” The same doctrine-was recognized in Close v.

Commonwealth v. Mitchell

234 Pa. Super. 21 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1975

Interpreting the facts in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, as we must, Commonwealth v. Minor, supra; Commonwealth v. … Brown, 309 Pa. 515 . However, as we said in Com. v.

Com. v. Chamberlain, M.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 2014

Commonwealth v. Brown, 23 A.3d 544, 559-60 (Pa. Super. 2011) (en banc) (citations omitted). … Brown, supra. Appellant also fails to recognize that the “facts and circumstances established by the Commonwealth need not preclude every possibility of innocence.” Commonwealth v.

Com. v. Drayton, R.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 2, 2020

have to be granted release from the parole board in the state. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 48 A.3d 1275, 1277-78 (Pa. Super. 2012).

Com. v. Shoffner, N.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 2025

Commonwealth v. Brown, 249 A.3d 1206, 1210 (Pa.Super. 2021). … See e.g., Commonwealth v.

M.E.V. v. F.P.W.

2014 Pa. Super. 204 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 2014

Similarly, in M.P. v. M.P., we found error where the trial court listed the § 5328(a) factors but failed to apply them. 54 A.3d 950, 955-56 (Pa.Super.2012). S.W.D. v. … Saintz v. Rinker, 902 A.2d 509, 512 (Pa.Super.2006) (quoting Arnold v. Arnold, 847 A.2d 674, 677 (Pa.Super.2004)).

Carbis Walker, LLP v. Hill, Barth and King, LLC

2007 Pa. Super. 221 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 2007

In Miles-McClellan Construction Co., Inc. v. Westerville City School Board, 2006 WL 1817228 , 2006 Ohio App. … The Miles-McClellan Court also characterized counsel for the school board as a “properly appointed agent in conduct of the litigation,” id. at ¶ 11, and, thus, rejected the school board’s contention that it could not effectuate

Leonard, J. v. The Nema Group

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 6, 2020

See Pa.R.A.P. 341; Mier v. Stewart, 683 A.2d 930 (Pa. … Brown v. Halpern, 202 A.3d 687, 698 (Pa.

Com. v. Draper, M.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 2016

A prisoner can do that and a lot of whether a sentence is commuted has as much to do with who is the governor and what the Parole Board looks like or the Board of Pardons or whatever board is considering … Commonwealth v. Lewis, 2013 PA Super 62, 63 A.3d 1274, 1280 (Pa. Super. 2013) (citing Hill v. Lockhart, [supra]; Padilla v.

Hexter v. Haverford Township

169 Pa. Super. 168 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 1951

Wildee v. McKee, 111 Pa. 335, 337 ; Price v. Conway, 134 Pa. 340, 341 ; . . . Troop v. Franklin Savings & Trust Co., 291 Pa. 18 . … Davis v. Blume, 307 Pa. 406 .”

Commonwealth ex rel. Ridenour v. McHugh

179 Pa. Super. 69 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 1955

He was at the time confined in the Cambria County Prison under detainer of the Pennsylvania Board of Parole, but is now an inmate of the Western Penitentiary. … Johnson v. Burke, 174 Pa. Superior Ct. 119 , 100 A. 2d 125 . See also Commonwealth ex rel. Swieczkowski v. Burke, 173 Pa. Superior Ct. 363 , 98 A. 2d 229 ; Commonwealth ex rel. La Tempa v. Burke, 175 Pa.

McCormick v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

151 Pa. Super. 196 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1942

We concede that it is the duty of the administrative boards to hold fair and open hearings and to give notice so that those interested may have an opportunity to be heard and the “rudiments of fair play” be observed. … American Bond and Mortgage Co. et al. v. United States, 31 Fed. (2d) 448. The appeal from that decision was dimissed in 282 U. S. 374 . Mr.

Commonwealth v. MacKey

177 A.3d 221 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 2017

See Commonwealth v. … See Florida v.

Byrne v. Progress Plate Making Co.

158 Pa. Super. 51 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1945

Babcock v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 137 Pa. Superior Ct. 517 , 9 A. 2d 492 . In his present employment he works, with overtime, about 53 hours each week. … Hite v. Rockhill Coal Co., 151 Pa. Superior Ct. 284 , 30 A. 2d 212 . Claimant owes his opportunity for employment at higher wages, not to sentimental considerations as in Weinstock v. United Cigar Stores Co., 137 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Springer

2008 Pa. Super. 275 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 1, 2008

Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 767 A.2d 576, 581 (Pa.Super.2001). We presume counsel is effec *1267 tive and place upon Appellant the burden of proving otherwise. Id. (citations omitted).

Beth-Allen Sales Co. v. Hartford Insurance Group

217 Pa. Super. 42 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 1970

Opinion by Hoffman, J., This case, which involved a claim of less than $2,-000.00, was submitted to a Board of Arbitrators in *44 Lehigh County. … Frost v. Roatch, 6 Wharton 359 (1841); Commonwealth for Allen v. Finney, 17 S. & R. 282 (1828); Cochran v. Parker, 6 S. & R. 549 (1821); Commonwealth v. Lamar, 32 Pa. Superior Ct. 200 (1906); Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Heaster

171 A.3d 268 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 18, 2017

See Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 982 A.2d 1017, 1019 (Pa.Super. 2009).

Gray, P. v. Jackson, G.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 2018

: PENNSYLVANIA BARRY GRAY : : : v. … J.S. v. Whetzel, 860 A.2d 1112, 1118 (Pa. Super. 2004). If events occur to eliminate the claim or controversy at any stage in the process, the case becomes moot. Id.