Case law

Mills v. Pennsylvania Mutual Live Stock Insurance

57 Pa. Super. 483 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 1914

as it may, before the sixty days had expired in which the plaintiff was required to give notice of his loss in writing and file proofs of such loss, the company .by a letter sent to the plaintiff, informed him that the board … Co. v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 97 Pa. 15 ; Lebanon Mutual Ins. Co. v. Erb, 112 Pa. 149 ; Union Type Foundry Co. v. Kittanning Ins. Co., 138 Pa. 137 ; Weiss v. American Fire Ins. Co., 148 Pa. 349 ; White v.

Commonwealth v. Winegrad

119 Pa. Super. 78 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 2, 1935

The checks were drawn on the Treasury Department and sent to the office of the retirement board for mailing, which was done under Winegrad’s supervision. … In Com. v.

Commonwealth v. Suplee

255 Pa. Super. 351 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1978

Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. … Thus, in Virginia Board of Pharmacy v.

Commonwealth v. Curley

2016 Pa. Super. 13 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 2016

So what he told me wasn’t going to be confidential….I mean, if the board asked, I would tell them.” Id. at 93-94. Nevertheless, Ms. Baldwin did not relate this information to the Board of Trustees. … In the companion case of Commonwealth v.

Bowersox v. Progressive Casualty Insurance

2001 Pa. Super. 226 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 2001

Co. v. … Jeffrey v. Erie Ins. Exch., 423 Pa.Super. 483 , 621 A.2d 635, 640 (1993) (en banc). 5 . In Paylor v. Hartford Ins.

Robb v. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurance on Lives & Granting Annuities

3 Pa. Super. 254 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 1897

v. … Hoag v. R. R. Co., supra; Pass. Ry. Co. v. Trich, 117 Pa. 390 ; Swanson v. Crandall, 2 Pa. Superior Ct. 85 .

Podgur v. Otto Eisenlohr & Bros.

135 Pa. Super. 469 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1939

The board affirmed the referee’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and award of compensation. … See Paulin v. Williams & Co., Inc. et al., 122 Pa. Superior Ct. 462 , 186 A. 415 , affirmed 327 Pa. 579 , 195 A. 40 . See, also, Tappato et al. v. Teplick & Eisenberg Co. et al., 133 Pa. Superior Ct. 231 , 2 A. 2d 545 .

Ruttenburg, Exr. v. Fire Ins. Co.

122 Pa. Super. 363 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 1936

In Brown v. Schock, 77 Pa. 471 , page 479, it was said: “In a question of circumstantial evidence, the proof derived from the circumstances is a question of natural presumption, and is to be found by the jury. … In Hill v. Central Accident Ins.

De Rosa v. Westmoreland Coal Co.

141 Pa. Super. 537 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1940

After an appeal, the board remanded the case to the referee for further hearing and determination. … Gillman v. Media Etc., E. Ry. Co., 224 Pa. 267 , 73 A. 342 ; Howell v. St. Clair Coal Co., 95 Pa. Superior Ct. 310 .

Schaefer v. Schafer

189 Pa. Super. 120 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1959

He never did return and the defendant has received no word from him either directly or indirectly since he boarded ship at New York in October 1947. … Thewlis’s Estate, 217 Pa. 307 , 66 A. 519 and particularly Fritsche v. O’Neill, 147 Pa.

St. Clement's B. & L. Ass'n v. McCann

126 Pa. Super. 20 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1936

The board of directors did not authorize or direct this satisfaction; it was done on information given to the attorney-in-fact by the secretary of the association “or some other officer thereof.” … In Saint v.

Commonwealth ex rel. Orth v. Rundle

203 Pa. Super. 449 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 1964

Goodfellow v. Rundle, 203 Pa. Superior Ct. 419 , 201 A. 2d 615 (1964), as finally determined by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on our certification. Remanded. … , convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a minimum of two years to a maximum of four years, to commence at the expiration of his present confinement, the termination date of which has been set by the Parole Board

Com. v. Padilla, A.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 2021

Commonwealth v. Brown, 538 Pa. 410, 648 A.2d 1177 (1994). … Maryland v. Craig, supra, at 110 S.Ct. at 3166–67, 111 L.Ed.2d at 682. In the midst of a global pandemic, Ms. Brown and Mr. Jackson testified in person before Appellant in the courtroom.

Commonwealth v. Murray

2007 Pa. Super. 307 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 2007

In Commonwealth v. … United States v.

Ridgeway v. U.S. Life Credit Life Insurance

2002 Pa. Super. 54 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 2002

Brown v. … Romano v.

Commonwealth v. James

2004 Pa. Super. 466 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 2004

In Commonwealth v. … In Commonwealth v.

Cox v. Cox

187 Pa. Super. 177 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1958

Brady v. Brady, 168 Pa. Superior Ct. 538 , 79 A. 2d 803 ; Morgan v. Morgan, 182 Pa. Superior Ct. 182 , 126 A. 2d 805 . In Albrecht v. Albrecht, 175 Pa. … Campana v. Campana, 186 Pa. Superior Ct. 472 , 142 A. 2d 169 ; Rothman v. Rothman, 180 Pa. Superior Ct. 421 , 119 A. 2d 584 .

Kepperling's Estate

129 Pa. Super. 560 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1937

Claimant was a boarding-house mistress, not related to decedent by blood or marriage, and could cancel the contract at any time. It is now too late to set up a claim for services not recognized by decedent. … Appellant argues that the facts in Harrington v. Hickman, 148 Pa. 401 , 23 A. 1071 , and Heck v. Rettick, 99 Pa. Superior Ct. 211 are so similar to the present case as to be controlling on the present appeal. In Heck v.

Com. v. Ross, T.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 2018

Commonwealth v. Furgess, 149 A.3d 90 (Pa. Super. 2016). … Commonwealth v. Brown, 111 A.3d 171, 176-177 (Pa. Super. 2015) (quoting Commonwealth v. Bennett, 930 A.2d 1264, 1272 (Pa. 2007) (emphasis in original).

Weathers v. Pennsylvania Railroad

94 Pa. Super. 50 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 1928

The law involved in this feature of the ease is stated in the following cases, which involved a wrongful ejection of a passenger from a train: Cleaver v. Pennsylvania Co., 72 Pa. Superior Ct. 271 ; Reimard v. B. & S. R. … Co., supra; Tilburg v. Northern Central Ry. Co., 217 Pa. 618 ; and Malone v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. R. Co., 152 Pa. 390 . The assignments of error are overruled and the judgment is affirmed.