Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspasuperct

10,000+ results

0.36s

  • South Lebanon Township School District's Petition

    22 Pa. Super. 330 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1903

    In Directors of the Poor of Schuylkill County v. … It is quite clear that, prior to the act of 1889, supra, the school board could not have taken the property of the poor directors for school purposes.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Boyle, E. v. Main Line Health

    2025 Pa. Super. 148 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 2025

    17, 2025 I agree with the learned Majority that the Main Line Defendants did not meet their burden of establishing that the PSRS report arose out of a matter reviewed by a patient safety committee or a governing board … See Stange v. Janssen Pharms., Inc., 179 A.3d 45, 64 n.7 (Pa. Super. 2018) (holding that issue raised for the first time in motion for reconsideration to trial court was waived); see also Meyer-Chatfield Corp. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Loder & Sharp, Inc. v. Township of Hamilton

    100 Pa. Super. 103 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 1930

    Highways, who was the official of that department who had been designated by the State Highway Commissioner, under the authority of the Administrative Code of 1923, supra, to approve or disapprove contracts entered into by the board … Co. v. Hemphill, 94 Pa. Superior Ct. 362 ; Leonard Co. v. Scranton Coco-Cola Bottling Co., 90 Pa. Superior Ct. 360 ; Standard Brewing Co. v. The Knapp Co., 79 Pa. Superior Ct. 252 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Com. v. Garcia, N.

    Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 2025

    Brown, 145 A.3d 184, 188 (Pa. … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 111 A.3d 171, 176 (Pa. Super. 2015) (PCRA timeliness exception at 42 Pa.C.S.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Bele v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.

    146 Pa. Super. 65 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1941

    Cartin v. Standard Tin Plate Co., 263 Pa. 56 , 106 A. 63 . … Kitchen v. Miller Bros. Co., 115 Pa. Superior Ct. 141 , 174 A. 919 . See also Tinsman v. Jones & Laughlin S. Corp., 118 Pa. Superior Ct. 516, 180 A. 175 ; Strickland v. Baugh & Sons Co. et al., 139 Pa.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Com. v. Rose, G.

    Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 2015

    Lee v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 885 A.2d 634 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2005). While a person is on “parole” he is in fact still serving his sentence. Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Com. v. Samuels, S.

    Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 2025

    Commonwealth v. Brown, 23 A.3d 544, 559-60 (Pa. Super. 2011) (en banc) (citations omitted). … black); (2) hat (brim v. no brim); (3) facial hair (beard v. no beard); and (4) S.M. smelled cologne on her assailant.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Hyde v. Hyde

    421 Pa. Super. 415 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 6, 1992

    See: Brown v. Hall, 495 Pa. 635 , 643 n. 11, 435 A.2d 859 , 863 n. 11 (1981); Travitzky v. Travitzky, 369 Pa.Super. 65 , 79 n. 6, 534 A.2d 1081 , 1088 n. 6 (1987); Oman v. … See: Bedford v. Bedford, 386 Pa.Super. 349 , 563 A.2d 102 (1989); Chesonis v. Chesonis, 372 Pa.Super. 113 , 538 A.2d 1376 (1988). In fact, however, the holding in Steinmetz v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Com. v. Cotton, D., Jr.

    Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 6, 2022

    Brown were allegedly associated. … Then, in Miller v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • First National Consumer Discount Co. v. McCrossan

    336 Pa. Super. 541 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1984

    As with the first loan, a judgment note and a resolution of the board of directors authorizing the loan were also executed. … The case of Girard Trust Bank v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Fortney v. Callenberger

    2002 Pa. Super. 182 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 2002

    Id. at 329 , 561 A.2d at 735 (quoting Emery v. … Penman, 429 Pa.Super. 517 , 632 A.2d 1342 (.1993), appeal denied, 537 Pa. 620 , 641 A.2d 586 (1994) (same); and Brown v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Albright v. City of Shamokin

    277 Pa. Super. 344 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 1980

    City of East Orange v. Board of Water Commissioners of East Orange, 73 N.J.Super. 440, 464 , 180 A.2d 185, 199 (1962); Summer Cottagers’ Ass’n of Cape May v. … Compare: Baird v. City of Fresno, 97 Cal.App.2d 336 , 217 P.2d 681 (1950). See also: Taylor v. Abernathy, supra, 422 Pa. at 642-43 , 222 A.2d at 870 . Order affirmed.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • McCall v. Bell Telephone Co.

    79 Pa. Super. 505 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1922

    The award was sustained by the compensation board. The court below dismissed the appeal on the ground that plaintiff was an employee and not an independent contractor. … This conclusion is in harmony with the decision in Smith v. State Workmen’s Insurance Fund, 262 Pa. 286 , and Kelley v. Del., Lacka. & W. R. R.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Maone v. General Steel Castings Corp.

    154 Pa. Super. 460 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1943

    Her claim is governed by the 1937 act, in force on the date when the disability occurred (McIntyre v. Lavino & Co. et al., 344 Pa. 163 , 25 A. 2d 163 ; Polk v. Western Bedding Co. et al., 145 Pa. … Accordingly the court reversed the board and reinstated the award of the referee, but because of the remarriage of claimant after the order of the board, remitted the record for modification on that ground alone.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Murray v. Real Estate Title Insurance & Trust Co.

    39 Pa. Super. 438 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1909

    As was said by the learned referee in United Security, Life & Trust Co. v. … See Learning et al. v. Wise, 73 Pa. 173 ; Cunningham v. Wanamaker, 217 Pa. 497 ; National State Bank v. Weil, 141 Pa. 457 ; Cook v. United States, 91 U. S. 389 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Doemling v. Doemling

    118 Pa. Super. 426 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1935

    The respondent’s brother boarded with them. … See Neagley v. Neagley, 59 Pa. Superior Ct. 565 ; Noden v. Noden, 111 Pa. Superior Ct. 513 , 170 A. 465 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Muzzy

    2016 Pa. Super. 77 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2016

    The Sexual Offenders Assessment Board (“SOAB”) determined on July 30, 2013, that Appellant met the criteria to be designated a Sexually Violent Predator (“SVP”). … Commonwealth v. Widgins, 29 A.3d 816 (Pa. Super. 2011); see also Commonwealth v. Freeland, 106 A.3d 768, 774–775 (Pa.

    Cited 238 timesPublished
  • Doyle v. Central Railroad

    45 Pa. Super. 216 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1911

    In Fonseca v. … Justice Brown in Crary v. R. R.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • City of Philadelphia v. Pierre Uniforms, Inc.

    369 Pa. Super. 246 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 1987

    The appellant in Osser claimed on appeal that the Pension Board’s interpretation of the applicable city pension ordinance was erroneous. . … See, e.g., Credit Alliance Corporation v. Philadelphia Minit-Man Car Wash Corporation, 450 Pa. 367 , 301 A.2d 816 (1973); Three County Services, Inc. v. The Philadelphia Inquirer, 337 Pa.Super. 241 , 486 A.2d 997 (1985).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Com. v. Thomas, R.

    Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 2020

    See, e.g., Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.